mark

[mark @truongan412]

@FishAudio Drama

[mark @truongan412]

@ItakGol Europe has peace

[Martin LeBlanc @martinleblanc]

Seedance 2 is out globally on Freepik! 🎸

And now you got to learn how to prompt for it.

So I went ahead and made a Spaces workflow for you - link below.

And here's a prompt for you to kick off:

[STYLE]

Ultra-high detail Pixar-quality cinematic animation, 8K, soft global illumination, individual hair and fur strands, realistic fabric simulation, shallow depth of field, warm cozy lighting

[FORMAT]

16:9, cinematic multi-shot scene, slow tension build

[SCENE]

Cozy bedroom at night with strong 80s personality, colorful retro posters on walls, desk with glowing computer, warm lamp.

[CHARACTERS]

A young man with short dense curly blonde hair forming soft rounded clumps, pale skin, slightly tired blue eyes, wearing a black hoodie

A golden retriever with thick light golden fur and expressive eyes.

[CAMERA SYSTEM]

Smooth cinematic camera, slow push-ins, medium and close shots, no jitter.

A scene showing the guy coding. The dog wakes up from some noise. the guy asks what's up. the dog walk to across the room to a closed closet door. noise coming from inside. the guy walks up and gets ready to open the door and calms the dog.

[Jordan Daniel Chesney @jordandchesney]

Making commercials and films with AI isn’t just exciting — it’s the future.

That said, the hardest part isn’t the technology, it’s finding people you genuinely love working with, and sharpening your storytelling skills. Those two things will never be replaced by “clicking buttons.”

The fundamentals that carry over from traditional filmmaking remain the same:

📕 Strong stories
🤝 Strong relationships

If you treat these as secondary, you’ll eventually feel stuck and frustrated.

But if you keep them front and center — valued, protected, and constantly nurtured — you’ll thrive in this new era.

I’m deeply grateful to Julien Vallée and Google for giving me the opportunity to be part of this project. Here’s to many more.

Director: Julien Vallée (@julienvallee)
Composer: Blackpaw
AI artists: Julien Vallée, Jordan Daniel Chesney
Motion design: Kyle Harter, David Urbinati
Flame artist: Mathieu Arvisais
VFX artists: Le Jumper, Empty Frame (Jeremie Drapeau & Francois Careau)
Designer: Kelsey Lim
Sound design: David Urbinati
Producer: McKenzie Hayes
Lead producer: Angela Long

Google Maps Brand Creative
Senior Brand Marketing Director: Max Kaplan
Group Creative Lead, Search & Maps: Daniel Chandler

[mark @truongan412]

@AzeAlter @TeamYouTube better ban mass-produced channels than the one who has stories to tell

[mark @truongan412]

@alexgoughcooper Parker

[Alex Cooper @alexgoughcooper]

Introducing Parker: The world's first AI Creative Director.

100+ brands like Grüns, Lume and Legends use us already.

RT + Comment "Parker" and I'll send you 100+ AI prompt engineers for hire.

[mark @truongan412]

@priymrj And did you make money with it or just talk bs?

[Oleksandr Chase Car @OlekChaseCar]

I'm not supposed to say this, but screw it. I’m not shutting up about it @YouTube

I played by every rule. Won a legal case (Case #3007912819) against YouTube 5 months ago. Did everything right.

But what's happening now? Honestly insulting.

Let's talk about STANDARDS

YouTube's STANDARDS for terminating a creator's channel:

❌ Standard of evidence: NONE
❌ Standard of decision-making: AI moderation
❌ Standard of explanation: Copy/paste policy header and vague policy link
❌ Standard of documentation: ZERO (creators see nothing)
❌ Standard for appeal review: Automated rejection in minutes
❌ Legal Standard: Violating EU Digital Services Act (Article 17(1)(e) and (4) of the DSA) by failing to provide evidence and reasons for termination.
❌ Standard for creator support: Automated responses with no clear answers. If you somehow reach a human, you can get banned for 30 days just for asking fair questions.

My STANDARDS for defending my channel and my rights as a creator for the last 13 months:

✅ Legal Standard: Won a legal case and followed the DSA to the letter
✅ Standard of documentation: Complete documentation of every detail and every step, showing editing timelines, scripts, voiceovers, research, sources, and even the channels that were stealing my scripts, literally everything
✅ Standard of evidence: Legal-grade evidence, a legal decision showing termination was wrong and my content is legit
✅ Standard of explanation: Justified every step in detail
✅ Standard of review: Endured a 6-month independent legal process while patiently defending my rights
✅ Standard of content: YouTube's own employee made a rare human review of my channel in June 2024 and found no violations, confirming I follow the community guidelines (months before termination happened)

➡️My STANDARDS: As high as they can go for one small creator.
➡️YouTube's STANDARDS: please drop in the comments how YOU would describe these standards. (I'd rather not share the word I have in mind...)

And here's the crazy part:

❗️I had to hold myself to impossibly high standards just to defend myself.
❗️I provided evidence YouTube never provided.
❗️I spent more than a year proving wrong what their AI decided in seconds.
❗️I won a legal case because that was the only way to fight back for me.

And YouTube??? YouTube still can't meet the basic standard of following a legal decision or showing what I violated.

YouTube operates with zero STANDARDS for itself.

But the system forces creators to meet impossible STANDARDS just to survive.

How is that fair to anyone?

I stood up for my channel with legal facts and professional rigor.
YouTube is responding with silence, ignorance, and automated replies/emails.

I have done my part. I proved my innocence.
@TeamYouTube Now please do your part. Please reinstate the channel.

🆘 I need your help: RT this and like

Please make them listen, so they can't pretend that nothing happened. It's time for answers!

#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeInsider

[Nani josh @mister_manners_]

YouTube's Automation without accountability is killing creators.

Millions of dreams were terminated and destroyed by YouTube’s AI.
Not because creators were scammers… but because an automated system decided so.

Small creators like us woke up one day to see everything gone our channels, our income, our years of hard work all erased and labeled as “spam” without clear proof, without clarity, without a real human explanation.

What hurts the most is not just the termination.
It’s seeing that even after all this damage, AI is still being prioritized over real people.

Yes, AI is the future. Yes, AI has a place in our daily lives.

But if AI is truly meant to help, then why isn’t it being used to warn creators, to guide us, to tell us when we’re doing something wrong before destroying everything?

Instead, AI is being used as a final judge.
No warning. No chance. No empathy.
Years of effort. Sleepless nights. Learning skills from zero.

For many of us, YouTube wasn’t a hobby it was our career, our hope, our only income.
Meanwhile, real scammers and fraudsters still find their way onto the platform.
But here we are genuine creators begging for a human review, still unheard.

Ending dreams and careers with a machine decision isn’t progress.

It’s heartbreaking.
It feels like creators are being sacrificed in the name of automation.
This isn’t the future we believed in.
This feels like the end of the road for so many creators like me 💔

@TeamYouTube @YouTube All we just ask to involve real humans and check/review our channels.

[Jolly Wangcore @JollyWangcore]

Hmm yeah. I get why people are quitting their main channels on YouTube now.

[mark @truongan412]

🤡

[mark @truongan412]

@YouTube Free gift idea: stop promoting harmful contents and hire a human to review channels

[mark @truongan412]

@TeamYouTube

[Oleksandr Chase Car @OlekChaseCar]

I did what 99% of creators think is impossible - I legally defeated YouTube.

How does YouTube react? They're pretending it never happened.

Let me tell you a story that proves the system is designed to crush creators - even when you WIN legal case and the law is on your side 👇

➡️ June 2024: My channel "Chase Car" (20k subs) gets demonetized for "reused content."
I appeal. A HUMAN reviewer checks everything - my editing timeline, voiceovers, scripts.
They email me: "This is original content, you follow all the guidelines." Monetization restored. I'm relieved. A human verified me. I'm safe now.

➡️ November 2024: I wake up to find my entire channel TERMINATED. Same content. Same videos. Different result. Reason: "Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies".

Wait... what? A human JUST cleared me months ago. Since I was verified by a YouTube employee, I knew my content was fine. I was creating EV news/car review videos that the YouTube Team had already accepted. Yet, the AI bot didn't care this time.

I appeal → INSTANT rejection from the AI bot.

Most creators give up here. But as a European Union citizen, I have the opportunity to defend myself as a creator using European Union law. I filed a formal case with ADROIT, an official European Union certified dispute body.

March 2025: Case filed.
July 23, 2025: Decision arrives (attached)

The verdict:
✅ "Complaint is UPHELD"
✅ "YouTube's termination was NOT RIGHTFUL"
✅ "YouTube failed to specify violating content" and my channel should be reinstated.

An independent legal body ruled YouTube was WRONG. The best part? YouTube defended itself during the process but could not show what I had violated. I WON.

Here's where it gets terrifying - My channel is STILL terminated.

I've been emailing YouTube's legal team for 4 MONTHS. Bot replies and complete silence.

I never gave up; I fought fairly for my rights as a creator using the tools I had, and I won fair and square. Yet, they're acting like it never happened and the decision doesn't exist.

Think about that for a moment. Even when you:
➡️ Follow every rule
➡️ Have a YouTube employee confirm that your content follows the policies
➡️ Win an official legal case
➡️ Have a documented decision that your channel should be reinstated
...YouTube's AI system just ignores you, and contacting a human is impossible.

If they can do this to me AFTER I won, what chance does any creator have?

I'm not giving up. I am filing a complaint with the Irish regulator @CNaM_ie to force YouTube to honor the decision.

But I need your help: RT this and tag @TeamYouTube .
Make them respond, so they can't pretend this isn't happening.

Because if they can ignore a legal ruling, no creator is safe.

#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeInsider

[mark @truongan412]

@PsyopAnime this is amazing!

[Enderman @endermanch]

They will 100% delete the tweet, so that's an oopsie that happened here:

[Final Verdict @FinalVerdictYT]

YouTube just permanently BANNED me from their platform, even though I did nothing wrong.

My channel had over 40k subscribers and 7 million views. Then one morning, I woke up and it was just… gone. The reason? “Circumvention.”

But here’s the crazy part. I’ve never had another channel terminated before.

Support just told me their “policy team” did a human review, but they can’t tell me which channel mine was supposedly linked to.

And that’s the problem.
In real circumvention cases, like the recent termination of @Endermanch, YouTube actually showed the linked channel in the termination email, with its name and ID.
In my case? No linked channel. No ID. Nothing.

YouTube says: “to lift a circumvention ban, you have to fix or reinstate the linked channel first.”
But YouTube can’t tell me which channel that is.
So what exactly am I supposed to fix?

And remember, they are not just deleting my channel. They are permanently banning the person behind it. Me.
I’m literally banned for life from ever creating or owning another YouTube channel… because of a link that doesn’t even exist.

My channel was full of factual true crime documentaries, no politics, no hate, just verified court records.

Under EU law (the Digital Services Act), YouTube is legally required to give users a clear and specific explanation for removals or terminations.
If they can’t provide that, they have no legal basis to keep my channel deleted, and no legal basis to ban me.

If you’re experiencing the same thing, tag @TeamYouTube, retweet, and comment so this reaches real people who actually dare to look past automated decisions.
We deserve transparency.

[mark @truongan412]

@TeamYouTube please get a human to look at my case!

[netflixandchilly @netflixnchilly_]

🤖 AI is deciding which creators get to stay on YouTube. Not humans.

In just the last 6 months, YouTube has removed 2.8+ million channels.
And 76% of those bans came from the “Spam / Deceptive Practices / Scams” policy — the enforcement category that relies most heavily on automated systems.
Which means the algorithm is often the one deciding who stays on the platform… and who gets erased.

Appeals are frequently automated too — so the same system that flags the channel is the one denying the appeal.

If the AI makes a mistake, a creator’s entire career can disappear without any human review at all.

This isn’t just “policy enforcement.”
It’s real people losing years of work, income, and identity — instantly.

Permanent decisions need real human oversight.
If you (or someone you know) was banned under this policy, reply below so more creators can be seen.
RT this tweet + @TeamYouTube to help get real human review on cases. 🧾👇

(Images credit: @DanielTChirwa)

[DeepHumor @DeepHumor]

We’re not chasing trends, we’re creating appeals for false terminations

[Enderman @endermanch]

YouTube is openly lying about a human being on the other side of the screen.

You can verify whether it's an actual human from the YouTube team or AI talking to you by looking at the tweet source device. Sprinklr is the AI agent they're using to seed false hope into you.