Most of the work done by Mr. Jake Scumbag can be countered by a deeply reasoned, extremely novel, position: correlation is not causation. Is not that an amazing insight that most people are completely unfamiliar with! Read his papers and for every assertion repeat: correlation is not causation 🤦🏾
@mortyonaleash @JerusalemDemsas Let logic rule rather than title.
Very interesting how identical are your viewpoints with those “big names” professors vehemently trashing young folks whose work ultimately changed society. FYI Lakshya was teaching at Berkeley. Also, he’s smart & actually knows maths 😇. Hint …
An obvious lack of capability in advanced statistics and multi-step logical inferences coupled with malicious desire for mudslinging …. this may take away the reputation J. Grumbach spent years building. Now he is looking like a fool and am not sure this hate piece was worth it. The grapevine is full of people wondering what an awful human being Jake is. How do you wash away that stain?
Bonica and I have a paper on candidate WAR models we'll post soon. tl;dr
1) @SplitTicket_'s WAR is extremely biased
2) @gelliottmorris's is not; Bonica-Grumbach WAR gets similar estimate
3) Correlation ≠ causation, so WAR should not be used to compare moderates/progressives
Lack of capability in advanced math and multi-step logical inferences and desire for mudslinging will take away reputation J. Grumbach spent years building. Now he is looking like a fool and am not sure this hate piece was worth it. The grapevine is full of people wondering what an awful human being Jake is. How do you wash away that stain?
@CitronResearch Bitcoin is valued very high due to the potential of cryptocurrency. MSTR used to reflect potential/leverage of this potential. Its current price is potential of this potential of potential. Irrational exuberance …
@KomandoLeo@lxeagle17 At least split-ticket had courage and integrity to stand behind the model👏. At the end, all models were saying 50/50. No one ranked it as 65-35. The models are just as good as polls which again failed to get shy trump voters.
@RemyLevin@lxeagle17 No! “Data barely changed” is with respect to what the model was programmed to accept two/three months back. Good, junk proof models (like by split ticket), once made, have to consistently follow those rules. Additionally, otherwise the trends they capture become pointless.
@elonmusk@Tesla Truth on Robotaxi coming out. No firm date given for October & they’re just making prototypes so nothing to launch.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on you. Fool me 100 times, shame on you. Fool me 101 times, shame on me. #robotaxi#teslascam
@garyblack00 But you guys are hyping something which is technically decades away. And probably never ever possible using cameras even if you have you have always ON infinite bandwidth and a supercomputer in every car.
https://t.co/bfwc6ND92F
@TheCompoundNews@DivesTech@ycharts If you keep pumping TESLA then it will also reach this level. Conscience requires some in-depth analysis when your viewpoints are so widely reported. Shame on analysts like you.
https://t.co/hLjUYCsgE9
@Benzinga@DivesTech How did Tesla solve adversarial attack angle? More robotaxi = easier adv. attacks. By putting some dots invisible to eyes, a stop sign can disappear to a camera! Future may ask: why musk was allowed to bully/bluff w/out challenge. Math/science is neutral to all. Pl. read a bit🙏