@Willynumnum FWIW in my chapter this has been an ongoing, cyclical fight that has gone on for at least 7 years with a rotating cast of characters, and the mass politics people have gotten stronger by winning it. Same has happened in nyc, la, and Atlanta; I hope to see it continue expanding.
The lesbian bar story is useful because nearly every time you hear some innuendo about a successful Dsa chapter being a ‘bad coalition partner’ or ‘not listening to the community’ it’s because they wouldn’t play ball with a clique of entitled narcissists like the one in the story
Stakeholder vetoes and participatory democracy are mutually exclusive though! Successful membership orgs often use actual democracy (formal procedure with specific resolutions, governing and enforcing real decisions) to mitigate this kind of insanity, it’s not one thing!!
you're obsessed with the lesbian bar's mask policy because of woke.
i'm obsessed with the lesbian bar's mask policy because it reveals the psychotic levels of entitlement bred by stakeholder-veto culture and participatory democracy.
My team hired a zoomer a couple years ago. She’d written a very good undergraduate thesis, which demonstrated that she would easily succeed in the role. I expected we’d lose her to a better offer. If you’ve done this, you can have wet hair/iced coffee, but I suspect most haven’t.
@brent858 The Kennedy center protest would be good even if they were big standard libs, but most of those people vote for Dsa candidates, and a decent number pay dues and come to events. I’m glad they’re my neighbors!
In all this talk of misaligned ai we’ve forgotten about misaligned corporations: it is irresponsible for blizzard to release wow forever right before the midterms!
I’m more ambivalent about Christianity than I used to be, but it is really sad seeing evangelicals freak out about gerwig narnia as if narnia is this towering achievement of some great tradition. It’s true it’s most of their intellectual patrimony, but that’s what’s so sad.
A disturbing amount of contemporary literary fiction can be summarized as “a highly educated person in a major city is vaguely unhappy about something.”
People also know how to weight feasibility and salience pretty adroitly: everyone knows high info high income high attainment voters do this, but I strongly suspect others do too. Polling ideology is fine, but it feels like looking for your keys under the streetlight.
Someone does this it feels like every couple years, and it’s fine I guess, even good insofar as it reminds people that the structure of our political system is stupid, but my takeaway — based on doing full contact politics — is that most people hold their nominal views lightly.
The American electorate is heterodox — only 14% is completely conservative and 10% is completely liberal.
We mapped out that heterodoxy for the New York Times and @germanrlopez. Here's what we found.
Tempted to cynically ask if this is good, but as a social scientist (speaking in my personal capacity) I’m gonna go ahead and say I’m pretty confident it isn’t.
Nearly one in 6 Americans ages 16 to 29 is neither working nor studying, and that share has been rising. We want your help to understand why.
If you’re a young adult who falls into this category, or know someone who is, we want to hear from you ⤵️ https://t.co/wYYGi62fZp
@leylaaa31 Really confused about what — other than patronizing dismissal — the liberal arts modifier here is supposed to be doing. Like yeah I know I’m woke and most people aren’t, that’s why I try to convince others to get worker…
This discourse is silly: the left doesn’t have that much control over candidate recruitment, many working class people have degrees, and most young people have spent at least some time at college. Jackson is great, but making him the prescription is pundit bs.
Cowardly. It’s not a stretch to describe God as nonbinary as an extension of Athanasian orthodoxy, which talaricos theology otherwise affirms. I #standwithjasmine.
FOX: You said God is non-binary. Do you still stand by that?
Talarico: I was being provocative with that statement, I get that. What I was trying to say is that you can't use human categories to define God. That is not controversial theologically.