it started 2 years ago with a PoC
i ended up rewriting the code 9 times. mostly because of bad UX and architectural decisions
since March this is the only app that i use for personal productivity
and scheduling is just the first stop
try it out for free and lmk what you think
@jxnlco all you got to do now, is to wire the search bar into a codex query that generates a prompt for users who are too lazy to ask codex for a prompt
@josevalim We use worktrunk CLI to manage the work trees, it also has custom bootstrapping scripts to setup new environments for the apps (using portless heavily to avoid port conflicts)
The value in Harvey and Legora is not the software. It's the effort required to talk with people in the law domain to try out new technologies, and ensure ZDR on the LLMs, and maintain the software. The software is the easy part.
Harvey is valued at $11B. Legora just raised at $5.5B. I built their entire web application in two weeks and I'm making it open-source and free for everyone to use. Say hi to Mike: https://t.co/NdtTt5MSJ2.
When I got the chance to try Harvey and Legora, I was surprised by how simple they were. A thought came to mind: I could probably build something similar in no time at all with Claude. And so I did.
Assistant, project, tabular review and workflows. You get it all without vendor lock-in.
Mike offers law firms an alternative, where they own the application layer and aren't stuck with a vendor they're renewing forever.
You can try Mike in the demo on the website, or go to the GitHub link on the site to download the code and run a local version yourself.
@0xTechDean@trq212@om_patel5 Because if they would officially recognize that they have internal software issues, it would go against the idea that software was solved and no more swe are needed.