Twentyknown

TA is retarded. Pedo cult

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@bbands how is your shit bands more usefull than a powerfull probability calculator? You got this all wrong, trading is actually easy when you take the right odds.

[👑Zscorr-O👑 @Zscorr0]

Calls this “working”.
Give him more crayons.
He’s super busy.

[BApig @bapigindicator]

The Illusion of TA vs. The Harsh Reality of Quantitative Trading

Let’s explore a critical aspect of trading: the disparity between the illusions created by Technical Analysis (TA) and the often harsh reality of quantitative trading. It’s time to break down most common illusions and examine why these two approaches yield such different outcomes.

The Allure of TA

TA tools like RSI, MACD, moving averages, chart patterns and suport/resistance trendlines are popular for their simplicity. Traders can easily spot patterns, which creates the illusion that success is just about recognising and acting on these signals. This approach makes trading feel intuitive and straightforward, leading to a sense of control over market movements.

False Sense of Control

The allure of TA can breed overconfidence. The belief that one can "time" entries and exits based on historical patterns can be misleading. This false sense of control often leads traders to believe that mastering TA is the key to consistent profits.

Ignoring Market Complexity

However, what TA often overlooks is the inherent complexity of financial markets. Price movements are influenced by a great sum of factors, including economic data, geopolitical events, and market sentiment. By focusing solely on price patterns, TA reduces this complexity and creates an incomplete picture of market dynamics.

Market Inefficiencies

Moreover, TA fails to identify true market inefficiencies/price discrepancies that could be exploited for profit. These inefficiencies often arise from irrational behaviour among market participants. Unfortunately, TA indicators lack rigorous statistical validation, they’re more akin to educated guesses than thorough analyses.

Chasing Illusions

Traders using TA often fall into the pattern-chasing trap. What one trader interprets as a bullish signal, another may see as bearish. This subjectivity can lead to inconsistent decision-making and, ultimately, poor trading outcomes. Traders may also succumb to confirmation bias, only recognising patterns that reinforce their beliefs while ignoring contrary evidence.

Quantitative Indicators: Rigorous but Rare

In contrast, quantitative indicators aim to incorporate statistical rigour into trading. These methods also analyse historical data and employ sophisticated models and statistical tests to identify true market edges. Truly rigorous quantitative tools are very rare in the trading space and that goes double for the retail space.

Understanding True Inefficiencies

True market inefficiencies, like persistent mispricings due to behavioural biases or market constraints, can occasionally be quantified and exploited through quantitative tools. Yet, these inefficiencies are typically rare and fleeting, often eroding quickly as more participants leverage similar strategies.

Exposing Limitations

Quantitative trading reveals the complexity and randomness of financial markets. Unlike the perceived certainty of TA, the reality of quantitative models often uncovers the limitations of previously identified edges. Many backtests of strategies lack statistical rigour and validity. For instance, a strategy that appears profitable in backtesting might only succeed because it fits historical data too closely. This is known as overfitting.

Example: Imagine a trading strategy that has you buying based solely on a moving average crossover in a trending market. The backtest shows impressive profits over the past decade, but it was designed to account for that specific market condition. When market conditions shift or enter a sideways range, the strategy may perform poorly, exposing its limited applicability. Without proper statistical validation methods such as cross-validation or out-of-sample testing, traders may be misled into believing the strategy is robust when it's only a product of the specific dataset used.

Usually, when TA tools are combined with a quantitative approach, the illusion quickly falls apart. Quantitative tools are often not the most attractive to traders, as they paint the market picture in the most realistic way. And the reality of the markets is often disappointing for those who see it as an escape or an easy way to financial freedom!

The key point you should take away from this thread is not necessarily that TA indicators don't tell you anything useful about the market. Some might...sometimes... rarely...almost never😁. The key point is that they do not offer or help you identify a market edge in the form of an inefficiency/mispricing.

[👑Zscorr-O👑 @Zscorr0]

"Mean reversion", bunch of words. #zScorrO #Math #Statistics #Price #Trading #Options #Tasty #Jacob #MeanReversion #MeanReverting #Balipour #Bahram #BahramAlipour #Scorro

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@tradinglord Lets go little lord

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@CryptoCon_ What is the probability for each band?

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@k1m6a https://t.co/6fXyILzFkm

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@k1m6a "Trading on Fibonacci S&R zones ultimately fails to produce abnormal profits, irrespective of the zones’ width, due to the failure of Fibonacci levels to reflect genuine thresholds where prices are more likely to bounce compared to any other random non-Fibonacci levels."

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@k1m6a What math is it exactly you do? draw fibonacci numbers over price?
You are beeing fooled by randomness

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@userofintellect @bbands @TrendSpider @tradingview https://t.co/SFCX3lap9e

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@userofintellect @bbands @TrendSpider Also anything coming out of @tradingview I would stay away from.

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@userofintellect @bbands @TrendSpider Why double down on something useless? Price is a distribution. Its does not mean revert, but you can calculate your odds.

[Ryze.Fi @RyzeFi]

Don't WATCH this

This is NOT a revolutionary new product

GambleFi HASN'T got a new king

Don't signup for EARLY access

There WON'T be an airdrop

This isn't RYZE...

https://t.co/6S0UcMI4Vw

[Twentyknown @twentyknown]

@bitcoinjack How would you know any odds by drawing lines on your chart?

[Unc @PowUncPowPow]

TA is a mental illness and stubborn idiots are highly susceptible to it.

[Unc @PowUncPowPow]

now the moron is saying no one was man enough to say it to his face.

[Unc @PowUncPowPow]

@_Christ47 @CalculatingW @MetreSteven @saylor you mean the moron who said publicly price is probably just a frequency. anjineer knows bro u better listen.

[Unc @PowUncPowPow]

@bennpeifert how do u look passed **CMT**. dude is self reporting he's dumb. why get into details that if he could get he'd see how ridiculous his scam is. all this does is help the scammer scam better in the future. they need the chemo approach they're cancers. they know what they're doing.

[Unc @PowUncPowPow]

@cryptorhythms @keygenraver @IamNomad @PowUnc @inversebrah he's so dumb. I feel bad. but he's malicious. so whatever.
since 2020 he's had ptsd. I changed the stan's life and he won't even thank me. ngmi.

[👾 @bigscalpa]

@gainzxbt Price isn’t and never will be mean reverting bruh