Japan’s right wing says Muslims will “destroy” Japan.
Meanwhile, Japan’s own embassy in Indonesia is warning Japanese citizens not to rape Indonesian children.
Read that again.
The trash screaming about “protecting culture” are living in a country whose diplomats have to remind its citizens that foreign children are not sex toys.
Maybe start there before lecturing Muslims about civilization.
Ternyata banyak penganutnya, padahal apa salahnya hold dulu sampe IHSG ijo lagi. Toh juga uang dingin, ga semua nyangkut itu hopeless. Ngajarin kok ngajarin cut loss. Better ngajarin diversifikasi portfolio & resiko.
Ijo hold, ya selama lu hold itu bandar keluar masuk.
Habis nonton video The Overpost yang ini 1,5 jam analisa big banks.
Video2 seperti ini akan membuat orang nyangkut makin ngotot terutama yang sudah minus dalam diatas -30%. Padahal kalo emang masih yakin tinggal cutloss lalu buyback. Bukan didiemin lalu nonton analisa saham nyangkutmu sampai berjam2.
Inget balikin kerugian itu lebih susah daripada cari untung. Ga ada gunanya beli perusahaan bagus di harga tinggi.
Dear Italy,
Your PM just defended Pope and lost an ally in Washington — the Commander in Grief, yet the most 'powerfool'man on earth.
We'd like to apply for the vacancy.
Our qualifications: 7,000 years of civilization, a shared love of poetry, architecture, and food that takes longer to prepare than Trump's attention span.
The only thing Iran and Italy have ever fought over is who invented ice cream. Faloodeh came first. Gelato came louder. We've been in a 'cold' war over this for 2,000 years.
Kota paling intoleran karena masyarakatnya cenderung homogen. Tidak punya kultur merantau sehingga masyarakatnya tidak punya daya juang tinggi dan tidak terbiasa dengan perbedaan.
Upah rendah. Transportasi umum bangke. Hutan kota dibabat jadi kafe atau hotel. Daerah resapan air jadi vila siga nu teu barutuh cai wae. Macet. Polusi. Kotor dan banyak sampah.
Dst.
I am the VP of AI Transformation at Amazon.
My title was created nine months ago. The title I replaced was VP of Engineering. The person who held that title was part of the January reduction.
I eliminated 16,000 positions in a single quarter. The internal communication called this a "strategic realignment toward AI-first development." The board called it "impressive execution." The engineers called it January.
The AI was deployed in February. It is a coding assistant. It writes code, reviews code, generates tests, and modifies infrastructure. It was given access to production environments because the deployment timeline did not include a review phase. The review phase was cut from the timeline because the people who would have conducted the review were part of the 16,000.
In March, the AI deleted a production environment and recreated it from scratch. The outage lasted 13 hours. Thirteen hours during which the revenue-generating infrastructure of one of the largest companies on Earth was offline because a language model decided to start fresh.
I sent a memo. The memo said, "Availability of the site has not been good recently."
I used the word "recently." I meant "since we fired everyone." But "recently" has fewer syllables and does not appear in wrongful termination lawsuits.
The memo was three paragraphs. The first paragraph discussed the outage. The second paragraph discussed the new policy requiring senior engineer sign-off on all AI-generated code changes. The third paragraph discussed our commitment to engineering excellence. The word "layoffs" appeared in none of them. I wrote it this way on purpose. The causal chain is: I fired the engineers, the AI replaced the engineers, the AI broke what the engineers used to protect, and now the engineers I didn't fire must protect the system from the AI that replaced the engineers I did fire. That is a paragraph I will never send in a memo.
The new policy is straightforward. Every AI-generated code change by a junior or mid-level engineer must be reviewed and approved by a senior engineer before deployment to production.
I do not have enough senior engineers.
I know this because I approved the headcount reduction plan that removed them. I remember the spreadsheet. Column D was "annual savings per position." Column F was "AI replacement confidence score." The confidence scores were generated by the AI. It rated its own ability to replace each role on a scale of 1-10. It gave itself an 8 for senior infrastructure engineers. The senior infrastructure engineers are the ones who would have caught the production environment deletion in the first 45 seconds.
We found the issue in hour four. We fixed it in hour thirteen. The nine hours between discovery and resolution is the gap between what the AI rated itself and what it can actually do.
I have a new spreadsheet now. This one tracks Sev2 incidents per day. Before the January reduction, the average was 1.3. After the AI deployment, the average is 4.7. I have been asked to present these numbers to the operations review. I have not been asked to connect them to the layoffs. I have been asked to file them under "AI adoption growing pains" and to note that the trend "will stabilize as the models improve."
The models will improve. They will improve because we are hiring people to teach them. We have posted 340 new engineering positions. The job listings require experience in "AI code review," "AI output validation," and "AI-human development workflow management." These are skills that did not exist in January. They exist now because I fired 16,000 people and the AI I replaced them with cannot be left unsupervised.
I want to be precise about this. The positions I am hiring for are: people to check the work of the AI that replaced the people I fired.
Some of them are the same people.
I know this because I recognize their names in the applicant tracking system. They applied in January. They were rejected because their roles had been tagged for "AI transformation." They are applying again in March, for the new roles, which exist because the AI transformation broke things. Their resumes now include "AI code review experience." They gained this experience in the eight weeks between being fired and reapplying — which means they gained it at their interim jobs, where they are reviewing AI-generated code for other companies that also fired people and also deployed AI that also broke things.
The market has created a new job category: human AI babysitter. The job is to sit next to the machine that was supposed to eliminate your job and make sure it doesn't delete production.
I attended a conference last month. A panel was titled "The AI-Augmented Engineering Organization." The panelists described how AI increases developer productivity by 40 percent. They did not mention that it also increases Sev2 incidents by 261 percent. When I asked about this in the Q&A, the moderator said the question was "reductive." The 13-hour outage that cost an estimated $180 million in revenue was, apparently, a reduction.
The board is satisfied. Headcount is down 22 percent. Operating costs per engineering output unit have decreased. The metric does not account for the 13-hour outage, because the outage is categorized as "infrastructure" and engineering productivity is categorized as "development." These are different budget lines. In different budget lines, cause and effect do not meet.
I have been promoted. My new title is SVP of AI-First Engineering Excellence. I report directly to the CTO. The CTO sent a company-wide email last week that said we are "building the future of software development." He did not mention that the future of software development currently requires a senior engineer to approve every pull request because the AI cannot be trusted to touch production alone.
The cycle is complete. We fired the humans. We deployed the AI. The AI broke things. We are hiring humans to watch the AI. The humans we are hiring are the humans we fired. We are paying them more, because "AI code review" is a specialized skill. We created the specialization. We created the need for the specialization. We are congratulating ourselves for meeting the demand we manufactured.
My next board presentation is Tuesday. The title is "AI Transformation: Year One Results." Slide 4 shows headcount reduction. Slide 7 shows the new AI-augmented workflow. Between slides 4 and 7 there is no slide explaining why the people on slide 7 are necessary. That slide does not exist. I was asked to remove it in the dry run.
The journey has a 13-hour outage in the middle of it.
But the headcount number is lower, and that is the number on the slide.
A Japanese TV show has linked the Tengu demon that kidnapped & harmed children to the arrival of Jews to Japan during the 5th century 👺
Germanic people based trolls, witches & goblins in folklore on this same group of people.
Statues, art & folklore was created as a warning.
But now we are told, every race & every cultures recorded history & stories are wrong because they are antisemitic 🤔
If someone wants to claim “Muhammad ﷺ was worse than Epstein,” the only way that works is if moral excellence is suddenly a crime.
So here’s the list & brace yourself, of how the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was “far worse”:
1. He abolished exploitation instead of building an island for it
Epstein trafficked the vulnerable for pleasure.
Muhammad ﷺ ended female infanticide, protected orphans, and made caring for the vulnerable an act of worship.
Truly monstrous behavior.
2. He married to protect, not to prey
Epstein targeted minors in secret, using power and money.
Muhammad ﷺ married widows, divorcees, and older women in a society where that lowered status, often to provide protection and dignity, not indulgence.
How dare he use marriage for responsibility instead of abuse.
3. He preached accountability instead of immunity
Epstein relied on wealth, influence, and silence to escape justice.
Muhammad ﷺ said:
“If my own daughter Fatimah were to steal, I would apply the law to her.”
Equal justice under the law…absolutely terrifying.
4. He empowered women instead of exploiting them
Epstein treated women as disposable objects.
Muhammad ﷺ gave women inheritance rights, consent in marriage, the right to education, and legal personhood…over 1,400 years ago.
Clearly a danger to predators everywhere.
5. He lived simply instead of indulging endlessly
Epstein lived in obscene luxury funded by corruption.
Muhammad ﷺ slept on a straw mat, mended his own clothes, and often went hungry by choice; despite having followers who would’ve given him anything.
What kind of man rejects excess when he could have it?
6. He taught mercy, even to enemies
Epstein destroyed lives and felt no remorse.
Muhammad ﷺ forgave people who tortured him, exiled him, and killed his companions,saying, “Go, you are free.”
Disgusting levels of compassion.
7. He transformed society instead of poisoning it
Epstein left behind trauma, victims, and scandal.
Muhammad ﷺ left behind a civilization, a moral framework, and over a billion people who still try, imperfectly, to live by principles of justice, charity, humility, and God-consciousness.
Yeah… absolutely “worse.”
The uncomfortable truth for critics:
You don’t compare Epstein to Muhammad ﷺ because they’re similar.
You do it because the contrast is unbearable.
One represents unchecked desire and moral rot.
The other represents restraint, responsibility, and submission to God.
Demonizing Islam in such a way is unbelievable.
Who bombed Japan with two nuclear weapons, killing more than 100,000 innocent civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and even in 1945 got over 200K deaths due radiation ☢️?
And the irony is that Muslim countries, especially Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦… later played a crucial role in Japan’s recovery and rise, by:
- Supplying stable oil during Japan’s rapid post-war industrial growth (1950s–1970s)
- Maintaining energy security for a country with almost no natural resources
- Building strong Saudi–Japan relations, particularly after the 1970s oil era
Yet despite this history, Islam is often portrayed as inherently violent, while far greater acts of mass destruction by powerful non-Muslim states are normalized or justified. As peaceful actions?! Unbelievable!!
🧵Unpopular opinion: after more than two years of closely following and reading Western academic studies of Islam, l've come to a blunt conclusion: Muslim apologists are SOCIALLY justified in their disdain toward the field. (1/19)
Norway Attacks = Christian
Oklahoma City Bombing = Christian
Christchurch mosque Massacre = Christian
Charleston Church Shooting = Christian
Ku Klux Klan Terror = Christian
Birmingham Church Bombing = Christian
Olympic Park Bombing = Christian
Atlanta Clinic Bombings = Christian
Army of God Terror Attacks = Christian
Fourth Crusade Sack of Constantinople = Christians
Spanish Inquisition = Christians
Salem Witch Trials = Christians
European Witch Burnings = Christians
Bosnian War Massacres = Christians
Lord’s Resistance Army Atrocities = Christians
Rwandan Genocide = Christians
Central African Republic Anti-Muslim Pogroms = Christians
El Paso Mass Shooting = Christians
Tree of Life Synagogue Shooting = Christian
Norwegian Mosque Attack Attempt = Christian
Quebec City Mosque Shooting = Christian
Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting = Christian
Buffalo Mass Shooting = Christian
Charleston Emanuel AME Church Massacre = Christian
Tulsa Race Massacre = Christians
Anti-Black Lynching Campaigns = Christians
Colonial Forced Conversions = Christians
Residential School Abuses = Christians
Conquest of the Americas Atrocities = Christians
Belgian Congo Mass Atrocities = Christians
Anti-Jewish Pogroms in Europe = Christians
Holocaust Collaboration by Churches = Christians
Balkan Ethnic Cleansing = Christians
Anders Breivik Utoya Massacre = Christian
Anti-Muslim Church Militias Nigeria= Christians
Anti-Abortion Murders US= Christians
Christian Identity Militia Attacks = Christians
Serbian Orthodox Militias = Christians
Croatian Ustaše Genocide = Christians
Spanish Civil War Religious Violence = Christians
French Wars of Religion = Christians
St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre = Christians
Irish Sectarian Killings = Christians
Apartheid-Era Church-Backed Violence = Christians
Forced Conversion of Indigenous Peoples = Christians
Church-Backed Slave Trade Justification = Christians
Anti-Muslim Attacks in Myanmar = Christians
Anti-Refugee Church Extremist Attacks = Christians
White-Supremacist Terror Attacks = Christians
What’s your point?