Tyler James

Christus vincit. Christus regnat. Christus imperat

Currently reading:
Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties by Archer

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

Conservatives in one qoute

[Tyler James @tylerjamesgon]

@L0m3z My wife and I ended up with a massive tax refund in 2020 and used it as earnest money to build a new house. By the time we closed later that year someone just starting the process was paying $25,000 more than we did because of rising costs of lumber and other resources

[FischerKing @FischerKing64]

I just want to get this straight. Israel built an elaborate conspiracy to kill Charlie Kirk because he did things like having Tucker speak at TPUSA events and having Dave Smith talk about Gaza. That’s basically the motive.

Israel is so good at targeted killings that it blew up Hezbollah with pagers. It assassinated a Hamas guy in Iran by hitting his exact room in a hotel in Tehran.

But with Charlie it planted the wrong rifle that could not possibly have delivered the fatal shot. They concocted video evidence of someone who isn’t really Tyler Robinson jumping off the roof after the shooting, and also placing him all around the campus.

This country could do a fantastic conspiracy, but screwed up really basic things. And some podcasters can collect all the data and outsmart Mossad.

It just doesn’t fly. The whole thing is amazing and ridiculous.

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

Paperwork Americans are not Americans

They have no claim to our history, heritage, or tradtions

Ban then from office, expel them through deportations, end their immigration

The hour is late, do we have the will to claim our birthright or will we sell it for a bowl of slop?

[John Doyle Clips @DoyleClips]

“The rest of your life will be defined by whether you and your friends can be indifferent to the tears of women and foreigners.”

- John Doyle

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

I believe Charlie Kirk was killed by Tyler Robinson.

Tyler Robinson confessed to the crime.
He essentially admitted to the crime in a Discord server.
He said he murdered Charlie because he hated his conservative political views.
The bullet casings had trantifa memes engraved on them.
His father's gun was found at the scene.
His DNA was found on the towel wrapped around the gun.
His palmprints were on both the gun and the roof from where the shots took place.
Footprints matching his shoe size and sneaker brand were found at the scene.

Anyone who does not believe that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk, such as yourself, is a subversive retard who uses concern trolling to fulfill some deep psychological need to uncover some sort of grand conspiracy that only you, Candace Owens, and a few other subversive retards apparently have uncovered.

You are scum. No one should ever take anything you say seriously ever again. Go fuck yourself.

[John Birch Society @The_JBS]

Your taxes are paying for an Illegal Alien with an Anchor Baby to live in the starter home your American kids can't afford.

[Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump]

He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.

[Tyler James @tylerjamesgon]

@JohnDoyle Even if we grant the idea that the GOP exists to do the bidding of a single foreign nation against the interests of the American people, isn't that 100x better than the party that would do the bidding of ANY foreign nation against the interests of the American people?

[Tyler James @tylerjamesgon]

@libsoftiktok I'm a just society, it would be much worse than arrests.

[Gareth Harney @OptimoPrincipi]

Russell Crowe on Gladiator 2:

‘They failed, and they failed because they didn’t understand what made the first film so successful: it had a moral core. Here’s the thing, most people want that. On the surface, they might go for entertainment, but if they’re going to love something and keep it with them forever, like that movie? …The love for that thing is because of its moral core. All guys want to be that man who can stay that strong, and all women want a man who can love them in that way.’

[𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡 @HwsEleutheroi]

Social media is filled with the righteous indignation of the Mormons---who claim to be the only true Church, all other churches are corrupt, their creeds an abomination, their ministers the hirelings of Satan---that they, the Mormons, are not really Christians. It's just a tad ironic, but it does play on the ignorance of most LDS, and non-LDS, about LDS history and teachings.

Their current modus operandi is to use the phrase "creedal Christians" and try to make the issue post-biblical. Here's the problem. The fundamental distinction between Christianity and Mormonism goes back to about 1400 BC, not 400 AD. Here is the foundational contrast:

Before the mountains were born,
Or Your brought forth the earth and the world,
Even from everlasting to everlasting,
You are God. (Psalm 90:2)

...for I am going to tell you how God came to be God. We have imagined and supposed that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea, and take away the veil, so that you may see.

Joseph Smith, 1844

Now, two quick things: 1) Psalm 90 is a song of Moses, hence the early date. 2) The King Follett Funeral Discourse is not LDS Scripture. But it is the most often cited sermon of Joseph Smith by the leaders of the LDS Church itself, and is one of two foundational sermons preached within the last months of his life.

Hence, the issue is stark and clear. Monotheism vs. polytheism, one transcendent Creator God vs. an exalted man from another planet. Just a reminder from Brigham Young as to how Smith's words were interpreted by those who heard him initially:

“Mankind are here because they are the offspring of parents who were first brought here from another earth, and were enabled to propagate their species, and they were commanded to multiply and replenish the earth. How many Gods there are, I do not know. But there never was a time when there were not Gods and worlds, and when men were not passing through the same ordeals that we are now passing through. That course has been from all eternity, and it is and will be to all eternity.”

Brigham Young, JD 7:333, August 28, 1859.

[Mike Winger @MikeWingerii]

Mormons are often very personally offended when Christians say that Mormonism isn’t Christian. This is dumb.

Joseph Smith’s first “encounter” with God involves God telling Smith that every creed Christians profess is an abomination to God.

Every creed.

That includes the Nicene Creed. They reject who God is, who Jesus is, the nature of salvation, the nature of exaltation, the clear teaching of Scripture, etc..

Mormonism rejects the very core of the Christian faith in all its essentials. Joseph Smith knew this but nowadays they are playing mind games with their own people and with real Christians.

Either THEY are Christians or WE are. It’s one or the other. Not both.

When asked “Will all be damned but Mormons?” Smith replied, “Yes, and a great portion of them unless they repent and work righteousness” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pg. 119)

The Doctrine and Covenants (1:30) leaves no doubt to the Mormon teaching of exclusivity when it says the LDS Church is “the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth, with which I, the Lord, am well pleased ….”

Brigham Young, second only to Joseph Smith in Mormonism said…

“Should you ask why we differ from other Christians, as they are called, it is simply because they are not Christians as the New Testament defines Christianity” (Journal of Discourses 10:230).

“The Christian world, so-called, are heathens as to the knowledge of the salvation of God” (Journal of Discourses 8:171).

I could easily give you pages of them saying they are the only true Christians and how we are all ignorant beasts and our doctrines are wrong. They knew at the time they had a different God, gospel, Scripture, and system of belief. But now it has become expedient to pretend otherwise while still preaching all those false and unchristian things.

Mormons, your leaders are gaslighting you and you are gaslighting us. You aren’t Christian but we want you to be. Flee from Mormonism. Flee from Joseph Smith.

[Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet]

Every aspect of the Henry Nowak murder is infuriating. In fact, you couldn't script a TV show that hits this many beats of stuningly absurd race-based British insanity. It's everything the left wanted George Floyd to be, but upon further inspection, was not.

A white kid, who is legally barred from carrying pepper spray in public, much less a sword, is murdered by a Sikh who is granted a special religious exemption to carry his murder weapon in public.

After killing Henry, the Sikh instantly lies and says he was the victim of racial abuse. Henry never uttered a racist word, but Vickrum Digwa knew that claiming racism was so baked into the British system it would be his best defense.

Henry spent his final moments on earth begging for help, crying out "I can't breath" saying he'd been stabbed in the chest.

The cops handcuffed Henry and replied coldly, "I don't think you have mate" before watching him expire.

The cops in the UK had been trained for years to treat racism as the greatest criminal act imaginable. They were following what's called a Race Action Plan, which gives special privileges to ethnic minorities so as not to offend them.

The son of Britain, whose ancestors on his mother's side likely fought in the Battle of Hastings, was killed by Digwa, but he was first betrayed by a government that turned its back on its own white citizens to coddle the emotions of brown immigrants.

The entire tragedy is a stunning indictment of the knee benders who have overseen the destruction of the West. They cared more about protecting the emotions of minorities than the lives of their own native born sons.

Indict those responsible.
Take back your country.
Save Britain.
Save the West.

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

"The purpose of a system is what it does. British police no longer appear organized to protect the people of Britain, but rather to eliminate them." https://t.co/y19iAHOk3y

[Tyler James @tylerjamesgon]

@GovBraun It's sad that we need declarations for basic realities and foundational truths in our time, but may God have mercy on us all the same

[Tim Kauffman @whpub]

When two Magisterium-submitting Catholics disagree on whether a papal statement was ex cathedra, a council was ecumenical, an excommunication was valid, a canonization was correct, an apparition’s teachings should be promulgated by the pope, Jews are morally “perfidious” or just “elder brothers in the faith,” the pope has the authority to ban the Latin Mass, an unpublished draft papal document is authoritative, Pachamma is an idol or just an “indigenous wooden statue,” a council was dogmatic or merely disciplinary, the third secret of Fatima was fully or only partially revealed, and whether the magisterium has made it sufficiently and manifestly evident by the frequency of repetition or the tenor of its words that it intended to promulgate a teaching definitively via the ordinary universal magisterium,

who decides?

Your answer is either:

1 we have to decide fallibly on our own, independent of the magisterium because no help is coming, but let’s ignore that fundamental epistemological flaw in our magisterium and criticize Protestants

2 the magisterium has left us flailing fallibly, and we will continue to flail on our own, but let’s ignore that fundamental epistemological flaw in our magisterium and criticize Protestants

3 let’s be honest: whoever argues fallibly but better on X; but let’s ignore that fundamental epistemological flaw in our magisterium and criticize Protestants

No choice necessary. That’s just where you are.

[🇺🇸 Based Americana 🇺🇸 @basedamericana]

“I’m marching to my death for this fledgling republic… so that 250 years later, spineless traitors can import 100 million third-worlders, dilute everything we bled for, and transform our shining city on a hill into a sprawling favela”

- The Unknown Patriot

[Logan Hall @loganclarkhall]

@AuronMacintyre “Why has everything gone woke and Anti-American?”

Idk man maybe because we have 100+ million people here who aren’t Americans

[Tyler James @tylerjamesgon]

@ImCliffordToday @not_our_guy I think the subtext here is, "I've popped off at the mouth too many times on X with things I could not intelligently defend if I were to be cross examined by someone knowledgeable."

Takes a lot less effort to just fire off a tweet "for the bois" than to think things through