1st gen American Cuban, historian, economist and ERP systems consultant. Constitutional conservative in support to MAGA. Adam Smith, Friedman, Keynesian, Sowell
All of these tips are for brainwashing. They're used to emotionally manipulate people into a completely alternate reality. That's why Democrats don't live in the real world.
A bigger threat, DSA Democrat Oliver Larkin. He represents the antithesis of what Florida is! A vote for a Democrat is a vote for Socialism. Democrats do have a plan, but are shy to say it. Phase 1
Step 1 - Win the House and Senate.
Step 2 - Blow up the filler-buster.
Phase 2
Step 1 - Deconstruct and rewrite the Constitution.
Step 2 - Say good bye to the USA, comrads.
This is Oliver Larkin’s DSA platform.
I experienced the same exact thing to me in Rancho Santa Margarita, California. I built a home in the Paragon neighborhood overlooking a golf course. A few years later, several acres across a one lane street a mosque was constructed, dramatically changing the character of the area and the surroundings that had originally attracted us to the property. Driving up into the Paragon, through a side street the first thing you see is a mosque. I had no issues with them. I currently live in Florida, but that did happen.
Schumer is telling voters to support DSA candidates running as Democrats solely to defeat President Trump. In other words: vote for socialism rather than Trump. Vote Democrat for a radical rewrite of the Constitution.
The DSA platform calls for abolishing the presidency, abolishing the Supreme Court, abolishing the Senate, abolishing ICE, opening the borders, defunding the police, defunding the Department of War, closing overseas military bases, taking public ownership of major corporations and essential industries, and placing the system of production under government control.
Voters need to understand exactly what they are being asked to support. A vote for a Democrat is becoming a vote for DSA. Schumer is asking Democrats to vote for socialism because he hates Trump. He is willing to risk the future of the country because he hates Trump.
If you are a Democrat, you need to think twice before voting for ANY Democrat, unless you're a Socialist or you hate Trump so much that you would rather support DSA Socialism. Remember, Democrats in the House and Senate vote together when it matters. Vote Democrat, and we risk losing the country.
@RossyPrime Rossy, small correction to your post. She is, by far, the ugliest first woman to be in the White House. She is up there on top as one of the ugliest women, period.
Flora, Al Sharpton, and his people are socialists. We are fortunate that we have that man defending our freedom from people like you and your people. You and your people are clueless about the danger your agenda would impose upon our freedom. Please ask me to detail and elaborate on those dangers, and I shall provide elaborated details on how we'll lose our country if we listen to you and your ilk.
The Hill’s Rising Misrepresents How Tariffs Work
I’m not sure where The Hill’s Rising finds some of its guests and commentators, but they should avoid speaking so confidently about subjects they do not understand. Perhaps it's intentional gaslighting.
Their discussion of tariffs showed how little understanding they have of how tariffs actually work. Tariffs are primarily used to address unfair trade practices, improve access to foreign markets, and create a more level playing field for domestic producers. Although importers pay the tariff and may pass some of the cost to consumers, describing tariffs simply as ‘taxes on Americans’ is misleading. Many countries impose significantly higher tariffs and other trade barriers on U.S. goods than the United States imposes on theirs. These types of broadcasts are misleading and simply gaslight Americans with false statements and false assumptions. Do you think these left-leaning commentators would be criticizing Tariffs if it were Democrats imposing those Tariffs?
Sen. John Fetterman tells Zohran Mamdani to "fix a pothole," blasting the NYC mayoral candidate for weighing in on foreign policy:
“Now you have the mayor of a city. You’re a mayor, dude. You’re a mayor. You can fix a pothole. You can take out the trash. But you can’t order people to arrest anybody any more than I could. I couldn’t have him arrested if he came to Pennsylvania. It’s a joke, and he’s a clown. He also said that Netanyahu is not welcome in New York. You can’t say that any more than I can say, ‘Mayor, you’re not welcome in Pennsylvania.’ So sit down. I know you’re a clown, and you’re just going to pander to the fringe because that’s part of your base. I know you’re angry at Netanyahu because he killed a lot of people you admire, whether it’s Sinwar, Nasrallah, or Qaani in Iran. He’ll only criticize the prime minister of Israel, but he never criticizes Hamas. He never criticizes Hezbollah or Iran. I’ve never heard the mayor condemn Iran for killing 30,000 or 40,000 of its own young people who were simply asking for democracy in their country.”
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani is a liar who hates everything America stands for — and it’s not even related to Israel. Wake up Americans. You’re losing your country.
This speech by @marcorubio mostly flew under the radar, which is really unfortunate.
Take the time to listen. This is Churchillian, this is Reaganesque. Our future is bright, America! #48?
The DSA and its platform are genuinely confusing. On its website, under the page titled “National Mobilization Against Genocide,” dated June 15, 2026, the first paragraph advocates the principles of unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Then, in the third paragraph on that same page, the DSA seems to criticize others for wrapping themselves in the American flag. That raises a simple question: what flag do the members of DSA wrap themselves in, if it's not the American flag?
The page also refers to the “democratically elected bourgeoisie” controlling the country. Who, specifically, are these democratically elected members of the bourgeoisie? Are you saying that POTUS is controlling the country? Is that not, to the extent it is legal, how an elected executive branch is supposed to function?
In the same paragraph, am I to infer that POTUS or other elected officials are exercising power illegally? If so, please provide specific evidentiary details explaining who is doing so, what actions are unlawful, and how those actions constitute improper control of the country.
Can someone from the DSA explain precisely what these statements mean?