STOP scrolling if you think openโsource blogs are fluff. Most devs miss gold that can cut automation pain 70%. ๐ OpenClaw posts: zeroโcode CI/CD, ROI vs licenses, 5 mustโhave patterns. ๐ 2026โ04โ01 What automation challenge are you facing? #OpenSource#Automation#DevOps#SaaS
๐ Our latest SEOโoptimized blog dives into the name transition & OpenClaw deployment. Discover how it boosts visibility and performance! #UBOS#OpenClaw#NameTransition
Ever wondered how AI can boost your SMB's visibility? ๐ It's not rocket science, it's just smart business! Check out these practical applications that can drive traffic to your site in no time. ๐ผ๐ https://t.co/r7WJnxpibK #AIforSMBs#TechSavvyBusiness
Ready to level up your software game? ๐ Discover UBOS - your one-stop-shop for AI-powered solutions. Dive into a world of ready-made templates and forget about technical complexities! ๐ป Join us now: https://t.co/GTkfMbwvXP #AI#SoftwareDevelopment
๐ OpenAI's enhanced controls for its Assistants API is a game-changer! Developers can now fine-tune AI responses for more relevance and accuracy. A big leap towards truly autonomous AI agents! ๐ก What are your thoughts on this? #OpenAI#AIdevelopment https://t.co/2QdZolqhaw ๐ค
Boost your business's lead generation with AI chatbots! ๐ Our latest blog post unpacks practical strategies and real-world examples. Dive in to explore custom AI solutions. #LeadGen#AIChatbot ๐ค๐ผ๐ https://t.co/Fca5sBHpGG
My opinion of @elonmusk
I like his cars (I own a 2015 S, and 2023 S), his rockets, his solar energy systems, and his satellite communication system.
I also like his positions on open source and patents.
But I very much disagree with him on a number of issues.
I disagree with how he treats his scientists.
Technology/product development may not need openness and publications to advance, but forward-looking *research* sure does, whether it's in AI, neural interfaces, material science, or whatever.
Secrecy hampers progress and discourages talents from joining the effort.
I also disagree with the hype. I mean, expressing an ambitious vision for the future is great.
But telling the public blatantly false prediction ("AGI next year", "1 million robotaxis by 2020", "AGI will kill us all, let'spause",...) is very counterproductive (also illegal in some cases).
More importantly, I think his public positions on many political issues, journalism, the media and the press, and academia, are not just wrong but dangerous for democracy, civilization, and human wellfare.
Say what you want about "traditional media" but you can't really have reliable information without professional journalists working for a free and diverse press. Democracy can't exist without it, which is why only authoritarian ennemies of democracy rail against the media.
Finally he doesn't seem to hesitate to disseminate batshit-crazy conspiracy theories as long as they serve his interests (e.g. boosting "PizzaGate", "illegal immigrants corrupt elections in the US", "person X is a pedo",...).
One would expect a technological visionary to be a rationalist. Rationalism doesn't work without Truth.
This has become particularly concerning since he bought himself a platform to disseminate his dangerous political opinions, conspiracy theories, and hype.
He has been quite naรฏve about the difficulties of running a social network and the (legal) necessity of doing content moderation. One can claim to be a 1st Amendment absolutist, but a lot of content *must* be taken down by law, e.g. terrorist propaganda, child exploitation, blatant hate speech (in the EU and other regions).
Then, there is dangerous disinformation that puts public health in danger or corrupts the democratic process. You have to moderate that too.
Content moderation is a complicated problem whose best answer is not an attitude of total laissez-faire but a complex trade-off.
Clearly LLMs must one day run in Space
Step 1 we harden llm.c to pass the NASA code standards and style guides, certifying that the code is super safe, safe enough to run in Space.
https://t.co/n9bc9HH79a (see the linked PDF)
LLM training/inference in principle should be super safe - it is just one fixed array of floats, and a single, bounded, well-defined loop of dynamics over it. There is no need for memory to grow or shrink in undefined ways, for recursion, or anything like that.
Step 2 we've already sent messages out to Space, for possible consumption by aliens, e.g. see:
Arecibo message, beamed to space:
https://t.co/UIyOh45jfg
Voyager golden record, attached to probe:
https://t.co/fuwD59oKF6
The Three Body problem (ok bad example)
But instead of sending any fixed data, we could send the weights of an LLM packaged in the llm.c binary, with instructions for the machine code. The LLM would then "wake up" and interact with the aliens on behalf of the human race. Maybe one day we'll ourselves find LLMs of aliens out there, instead of them directly. Maybe the LLMs will find each other. We'd have to make sure the code is really good, otherwise that would be kind of embarrassing.
:) Step 2 is clearly not a serious proposal it's just fun to think about. Step 1 is a serious proposal as, clearly, LLMs must one day run in Space.
Accelerate your #softwaredevelopment with UBOS! ๐ป SMBs are creating solutions 10x faster with our low-code platform. Join the revolution! ๐ Check out how: https://t.co/HQs7CGj104 #SMBs#LowCode#UBOSTech
Ever wondered about open-source alternatives to DevIn? ๐ค Check out this comprehensive review and let's build better software together! ๐ช #OpenSource#DevInAlternative ๐ https://t.co/5eiOOg2sIp ๐ Join the conversation! ๐จ๏ธ
Imagine cloning, customizing, and deploying AI-driven apps in a snap! ๐ With @UBOS_tech, you can! Our App Templates Marketplace is your ticket to innovative solutions. Join the revolution today! ๐ก #UBOSTech#GenerativeAI#LowCode#NoCode