I've read your comments saying we can't call your system wrong by making noise on social media. And your responses over email were dismissive and rude: "our decision is final, our system is fine." And after multiple requests, you started blocking people instead of addressing their concerns. @fundingpips@Khldfx
I stand by my statement. I'm ready to cooperate fully: check my device, interview me, review my single trade, and I'll provide anything else you need. If your system is truly fair, an open verification should be nothing to fear.
Until then, I'll keep speaking up, and I'll stay respectful while doing it.
Thank you @Limitless_Noman bhaiโฅ๏ธ you have our respect.โฅ๏ธ
#fudingpips #forex #propfirm
You may think
You are bigger enough now to not give a fuck about traders who made you a little noticeable in This Prop space.
You guys would know the power of traders in no time . Iโll run worldwide campaign about this.
Good luck .
@Limitless_Noman@fundingpips Thank you so much @Limitless_Noman bhai, really appreciate your support ๐ Will share all my proofs and email correspondence with you as well when you want, happy to provide anything that helps raise this with @fundingpips management.
@fxnitin031@fundingpips Same issue here. They just banned you on assumption. So Thatโs why I called them โFunding Assumptive Pipsโ. All these people will also faced same issue soon.
#assumptivepips#forex#gold
This is exactly what happened. I offered full cooperation โ device details, IMEI info, even a live verification call โ but it was all declined. No specific evidence was shared, and the decision was called "final" without any real review. Traders deserve transparency when automated systems make permanent, life-impacting decisions like this.
Their second name is Funding Assumptive Pips
@fundingpips@Khldfx
#fundingpips #forex #gold #Assumptivepips
๐จ FUNDINGPIPS โDEVICE IDโ CASE RAISES QUESTIONS
Trader @Umerikram27 says FundingPips terminated his account after he passed both evaluation phases, citing a Device ID (CID) match with another user.
According to Umer, he offered device details, IMEI information and even a live verification call to prove the account was independently operated.
He says FundingPips declined the verification and refused to provide specific evidence behind the detection, eventually calling the decision final.
The bigger question:
When an automated detection leads to permanent termination, how much evidence should a trader be allowed to see or challenge?
Detection systems can protect firms โ but false positives can cost traders too.
@fundingpips@fundingpipsmod โ is there a fair review process for cases like this?
#PropFirms #Trading #FundingPips
๐จ Funding Pips. Both phases passed, then the funded account was never issued.
@Umerikram27 says he passed both phases but his account was terminated right before getting the funded login.
The reason given was a device ID match.
He says the device is his and that he can prove it. He also says the final answer from the firm was that the decision was final and couldnโt be reversed.
The big question is simple:
What exactly matched, and why wasnโt a live device check enough to clear it?
@fundingpips@Khldfx@avikkfp
If thereโs a genuine device match, show the evidence behind it.
If the trader can prove the device is his, that should be considered too.
No guessing. Just the evidence.
#FundingPips #PropFirm #Trading #FundedTrader
@WilsonJame21072 Yeah, truly flawless system ๐ Paying out so generously while banning people on pure assumption. Maybe after that payout tweet, go ahead and ban another 10-15 traders too โ great work, really impressive stuff ๐๐ the great assumptive prop firm
@fundingpips@Khldfx
On September 2, 2026, FundingPips terminated my account โ right as I was about to receive my funded/live account after passing both evaluation phases through genuine, independent trading. Their reason: my "Device ID" (CID) allegedly matched another registered user's, which they said "may indicate" shared access, coordinated trading, or third-party involvement. No specific evidence, no timestamps, no explanation of how this was actually determined โ just a general claim, and immediate permanent termination.
I responded the same day. I explained I use my own separate, genuine device, and offered full cooperation: device details, IMEI information, and a live video verification call where I could show my physical device and log into my account in real time for their team to verify directly. I had nothing to hide, and I wanted this resolved properly.
FundingPips declined every offer. They said live verification "would not change the findings already established," and refused to disclose any specific evidence beyond the general Device ID claim, citing confidential "detection methodology." I exchanged multiple emails over the following days, laying out my case respectfully each time โ their replies got shorter and shorter until, on September 8, I received a final message: "our decision is final and cannot be reversed." No further explanation was ever given.
I'm not asking for anything unfair here. I passed both phases legitimately, and I remain fully willing to do a live interview, live video verification, or provide any other reasonable proof to confirm my devices and trading were entirely independent. All I'm asking for is a genuine, evidence-based review โ not a report I have no way to verify, followed by silence.
@fundingpips@fundingpipsmod@Khldfx@avikkfp please kindly look into this matter. Need your support.
#PropFirm #trader #XAUUSD #FundingPips #TradingCommunity #forex
The real issue isn't the PDF or the "final decision" line โ it's that no trader will feel safe putting in weeks of work and real capital if accounts can be banned at any phase on an assumption, whether it's CID or "reverse trading," with no real process to contest it.
If your systems are as good as you claim, show it: interview the trader, check the device live over screen share, go through everything properly โ and then make the call. That's a real investigation.
You can offer payouts worth millions, but if traders don't trust that their account โ and the effort behind it โ is actually safe, those payouts mean nothing. People will simply stop choosing your firm.
Bans and terminations should happen for genuine, demonstrable reasons โ not assumptions dressed up as "final decisions."
@fundingpips@Khldfx
#fundingpips #forex #propfirm
๐จ FUNDINGPIPS ACCOUNT TERMINATED โ BUT WHEREโS THE EVIDENCE?
On September 2, 2026, @FundingPips terminated a traderโs account just as he was about to receive his funded/live account after legitimately passing both evaluation phases.
According to the trader @Umerikram27 , the reason was a โDevice IDโ match with another registered user, which FundingPips said may indicate shared access, coordinated trading, or third-party involvement.
The trader says he:
โข Uses his own personal device
โข Never shared access or coordinated trades
โข Offered device details and IMEI information
โข Offered a live video verification to prove ownership and access
However, he claims FundingPips declined the verification and said it would not change their findings, while refusing to provide specific evidence due to โconfidential detection methodology.โ
After several emails, the trader says he received a final response on September 8 stating that the decision was final and could not be reversed.
If the trader is willing to verify his device and account access live, why not allow an independent verification?
And if the Device ID match is the basis for termination, what evidence can actually be provided to demonstrate that the account was accessed or controlled by someone else?
@Khldfx
Exactly โ this is becoming a pattern. First it was CID, and when that didn't hold up for others, now it's "reverse trading" accusations, sometimes even with normal trade gaps. I've seen yours and many other trader's case play out the same way: emails, a PDF, then a ban โ no real conversation.
FundingPips is now terminating accounts on assumptions, not verifiable evidence. No trader's account feels safe under this process.
@fundingpips โ if the evidence is real, show it. If it's not, stop ending careers over it.
@Khldfx
Thank you @propfirmnation1 for being my voice.
I offered live video verification, device details, IMEI, everything needed to independently confirm my case. That offer still stands.
A finding that can't survive being checked isn't evidence. It's an assumption.
@fundingpips โ give traders a real process, not a PDF and a form reply.
@Khldfx review your decision!!
#fundingpips #propfirm #forex
@Tradewithsam02@theproptruth@Khldfx@avikkfp@fundingpips Funny how the system is "100% accurate" until someone offers to verify it live โ then suddenly it "wouldn't change anything." Either show the evidence or reinstate the account. There's no third option that looks fair.