This is a fairly long film in terms of what X likes, but it is one of the most important and detailed videos that absolutely everybody should bookmark, watch and share.
This is the most detailed evidence-based film about the Origins of the Palestinian Cause, right from its Nazi roots.
I cannot complement the producer of this film, @rehoov, enough. This is a masterpiece of historical significance.
I hope people like @MOSSADil@marklevinshow@DefiyantlyFree@BillAckman@ACTBrigitte@jihadwatchRS and others may share this to a much wider audience. It is so essential that the truth is seen by everyone, and the lies exposed.
We now know from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Israel that The New York Times was made aware weeks before publishing Nicholas Kristof’s explosive op-ed that the independent commission, an NGO, was investigating and going to report on Hamas’ systemic use of sexual violence against Israeli women, girls, and men.
Remember, initially, we all thought it was just women and girls, and that was horrible enough. We now know Hamas at gunpoint forced men to have sexual relations with family members in their homes, something we really haven’t seen in the world much since Rwanda. Horrible stuff.
And The New York Times, according to Israel and the NGO, was made aware that this report was going come out May 12th. The NGO, independent from the government of Israel, asked for permission to run an article detailing its findings in The New York Times.
The New York Times responded that they were not interested in running an article on Hamas’ use of sexual violence against Israelis. And then the day before—not a week before, not a month before, not a week after—the day before, on May 11th, The New York Times runs this explosive Kristof piece.
Remember, The New York Times had said it was not interested in this subject. Then, the day before the NGO released its report, the paper ran an explosive piece that blamed the victims. Now, the Israelis are the perpetrators of mass systemic sexual violence against Palestinians. It flips everything on its head.
Can’t Israel just stop trying to prevent Terrorists from destroying it. It’s like…enough already. Obviously the Iranian Regime, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hamas want to wipe you out…just let them already, it’s annoying! Stop your expansionist dream of building homes schools and playgrounds in your historic homeland the size of New Jersey, and just become the 23rd Arab State, so we can all feel comfortable that a single Jewish State no longer exists. Just lay down your arms, allow Iran and its Terrorists proxies to slaughter every Jew from the river to the sea, and stop insisting on living, thriving, creating, producing and surviving. It’s really that simple.
It is really that simple.
Even Arab leaders admit it.
Everyone is sharing the Bill Clinton clip where he describes how Yasser Arafat rejected a generous peace offer at Camp David that would have given the Palestinians a state on 96 percent of the West Bank, land swaps, and a capital in East Jerusalem. Clinton says Arafat lied to him and that the Palestinian leadership never actually wanted a two-state solution. They wanted to destroy Israel. It’s a video often shared by people like @VividProwess, and it’s an important one for people to see.
Of course, critics immediately dismiss it. They claim Clinton is biased or he’s pro-Israel. They’ll tell you that you cannot trust the American perspective.
Ok, so let us set that aside.
Now watch this.
In this powerful interview, former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, a major Arab leader who was directly involved in negotiations, says exactly the same thing from the Arab side. He talks about the Mena House Conference in Cairo as well as the Camp David negotiations of 1978. All failed because of the Palestinians repeatedly rejecting any offer. The Oslo accords were signed but because Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad were not involved, they derailed the accords and any chance for peace by initiating 4 years of terrorist suicide attacks in Israel. Then came the second Camp David negotiations in 2000 which Arafat agreed to, then rejected and instead initiated the Second Intifada.
Mubarak explains how the Palestinians refused to even participate in the Mena House conference of 1977. He describes repeated opportunities they were given, including a detailed document that called for Israeli withdrawal from the Samaria, Judea and Gaza, security arrangements during a transitional period, and other major concessions. The Israelis were willing to negotiate on difficult issues like who would control security. The Palestinians, according to Mubarak, kept saying no and wasting chance after chance.
He speaks with clear frustration about how for decades the Palestinian side has rejected peace initiatives and realistic compromises.
The video further shows footage from the PLO representative in 1977, as well as old footage of Egyptian president Sadat who was involved in the Mena House and first Camp David negotiations of 1978.
This perhaps is far more impactful than Clinton’s account because it is not a Western or Israeli voice. It is prominent Arab leaders who lived the negotiations, who represented the broader Arab world, and who had zero incentive to defend Israel.
When leaders from both sides of the table describe the same pattern of Palestinian rejectionism and violence, it becomes much harder to dismiss as bias.
The pattern is clear across decades and across different voices… generous offers, repeated refusals, and continued demands for everything while giving nothing in return.
This is not ancient history. It is the core reason the conflict continues today.
If you value the truth, please share.
Truly diabolical, even by the Hezzies Islamo-Nazi standards.
But the real goal I suspect would be to blame this on Israel in order to create international pressure to stop its attacks against Hezbollah. Basically, another 2006 Qana massacre hoax on steroids. In fact, having been following this conflict for the last 30 years or so (and well, taking a tiny part in it), I have absolutely no doubt this was the real goal behind this.
I shudder to think what would have happened if they succeeded.
A genocide is happening in Gaza, they tell us. Then scroll your feed:
Comma Cafee, just opened in Gaza City. Espresso machines, plated desserts, dim lighting.
Vanilla Café. Upscale, glass facade.
Nova Restaurant in Khan Younis: sleek wood interior, beachfront seating. Named, apparently without irony, after the music festival where 364 Israelis were slaughtered on October 7.
O2 Restaurant. pizza, ice cream, milkshakes, TikTok food porn.
Open-air markets in Gaza City with apples, avocados, oranges, bananas.
Supermarkets stocked for Ramadan with imported goods.
A "Gaza Coffee" brand selling 100% Arabica premium beans, taking online orders, with five-star reviews dated this year.
Even Al Jazeera's writer concedes the cafes "were built with expensive materials, carefully painted, furnished with tables, sofas, and elegant chairs, with glass facades and shining lights."
Now hold that next to actual genocide.
Rwanda, 1994. 800,000 Tutsi murdered in 100 days. ~8,000 per day. Hutu radio read names of neighbors to be hacked apart by morning. No one opened a café.
Cambodia, 1975–79. Khmer Rouge emptied Phnom Penh at gunpoint in 72 hours. Currency abolished. Markets abolished. Eyeglasses got you killed. Two million dead.
The Holocaust. Warsaw Ghetto: 92,000 dead of starvation and disease before the deportations even began. Auschwitz processed 6,000 people a day into smoke. There were no glass-facade espresso bars in Łódź in 1943.
Srebrenica, July 1995. 8,372 men and boys executed in days. No restaurants reopened. They were in mass graves.
Armenia, 1915. Death marches into the Syrian desert. No imported avocados.
The common thread of genocide is that the targeted population is not allowed to exist. Not in cafes, not in markets, not in their homes, not anywhere. The perpetrator's entire project is their absence.
Gaza in 2026, by every honest description, is something else: a brutal war zone, partially destroyed, with a population suffering real hardship and simultaneously a place where new businesses open, beachfront restaurants serve customers, and a post war economy is being written about in business pages. Both things are true.
That is what war looks like. Lebanon 2006. Mosul 2017. Mariupol 2022. Aleppo 2016. Civilians die and life adapts around the destruction.
It is not what genocide looks like.
So why the word?
Because "genocide" is the most powerful word in the post-WWII moral vocabulary. It triggers automatic legal obligations, suspends normal debate, and short-circuits proportionality analysis. Apply it successfully and your adversary loses the right to defend itself before the argument even begins. That is exactly why it is being deployed by a side that started a war on October 7, took hostages, embedded itself in hospitals and schools, and now needs the West to force a ceasefire it could not win on the battlefield.
It is asymmetric warfare with a thesaurus. The rockets failed. The tunnels failed. The word might not.
Coffee in Gaza doesn't prove there is no suffering. It proves there is no genocide. Those are not the same claim and the people conflating them are counting on you not to notice.
יום הגיוון הוא הזדמנות להזכיר ששוק עבודה חזק הוא שוק עבודה שנותן מקום לכולם.אנחנו פועלים לקידום תעסוקה מגוונת, איכותית ושוויונית מתוך הבנה ששילוב אוכלוסיות מגוונות בתעסוקה הוא לא רק ערך חברתי, אלא גם מנוע צמיחה משמעותי למשק הישראלי. עוד מידע באתר https://t.co/qda1D57Lem