A major through-thread of my scholarly and professional career has been a deep fascination with data and its epistemic, social, and technical dimensions. As a PhD student and post-doc I examined the co-evolution of scientific data and theories in the past…https://t.co/WAnJ8A7R8r
Bittersweet farewell to my phenomenal colleagues at Algorithmia as they take the next step on their journey with DataRobot. Deepest gratitude to @doppenhe, Kenny Daniel, @atnowell, and countless others for the opportunity to learn and grow in ways that I…https://t.co/sV4QcboGVc
@DataRobot is acquiring @algorithmia, enhancing the leading #MLOps architecture for the enterprise. Welcome to the DataRobot family, Algorithmia! Learn more: https://t.co/SfkLuMLTVS
#appliedAI
Come join me! My remote-friendly team is looking to fill an intermediate-level software engineer role. Please reach out if you have questions.
https://t.co/5iLrS0shQ7
@jeremyphoward@arxiv_org@IEEEorg@TheOfficialACM With all due respect, it's time to dispose of the premise "arXiv publishes X for $ N." As a former member of the arXiv leadership team, I would strongly assert that not only is the premise false, it is deeply harmful.
@sunk818@jeremyphoward@arxiv_org@IEEEorg@TheOfficialACM Includes deferred cost of investment to prepare for increased growth, regulatory environments, changing user needs + scholarly norms, technology changes, etc. The business model was designed for a skeleton crew to operate a static service in an unchanging environment.
@jeremyphoward@arxiv_org@IEEEorg@TheOfficialACM My main concern here is that general acceptance of the "success" of that operating model obscures the real financial requirements of arXiv and other services like it.
@jeremyphoward@arxiv_org@IEEEorg@TheOfficialACM Highlighting brilliant work and encouraging investment is excellent. The problem is assuming that arXiv's historical $/e-print reflects actual costs in the long run. Cornell runs arXiv on that budget by deferring significant costs. Those costs will come due.