unmutabill

None

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@GaryMarcus And every damn AI expert at OpenAI and Microsoft is fully aware that this is inherent to how LLMs work, but yet they’ll keep pushing for these sorts of applications.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@kyleshannon @GaryMarcus No! It’s inherent to how LLMs work. There is no getting around it. You may not understand how LLMs work as well as you think you do.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@GaryMarcus https://t.co/azxHT9tRNv

[Sam Altman @sama]

ChatGPT is incredibly limited, but good enough at some things to create a misleading impression of greatness.

it's a mistake to be relying on it for anything important right now. it’s a preview of progress; we have lots of work to do on robustness and truthfulness.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@pim_brouwers I think it’s pretty obvious to most people that the dude is an a-hole so your best bet is probably just to ignore him.

What is kind of annoying though is how some people try to pretend that he’s not obviously an a-hole just because he makes something they really like.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@__mharrison__ @Zoom Webex?

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@kent_boogaart I think it would be better if WasContinuation appeared right below Timestamp. Yes, I’m advocating for a bool movement.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@TalkPython @PatViaforever @mkennedy Really good episode! Several of your exchanges had me thinking, “Man, these guys would really like #fsharp .” 😀

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@mayowaatte @Savlambda @wiredsis @OndrejPinka F# is obviously the greatest programming language ever created. If you can’t see that, I feel sorry for you.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@mayowaatte @Savlambda @wiredsis @OndrejPinka The problem with this conversation is not people’s obsession with convincing you of something, rather it is your feigned interest in being open to being convinced while really being committed to not being convinced. I believe the kids call this trolling.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@mayowaatte @Savlambda @wiredsis @OndrejPinka Eh, the framing seems fine to me.

“The savings and benefits are there but overrated.”
I wonder how you could know this.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@mayowaatte @Savlambda @wiredsis @OndrejPinka In the long run we are all dead.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@Savlambda @mayowaatte @wiredsis @OndrejPinka If you haven’t already read it, I highly recommend this book.
https://t.co/pFOGPWTN23

(Sorry if it’s already been suggested somewhere in this conversation)

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@Savlambda @mayowaatte @wiredsis @OndrejPinka *be made

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@duncanworthy @pblasucci To be fair, he didn’t say “always”.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@OndrejPinka Yeah, I guess I just feel that it’s not a good use of the verbose syntax. My brain wants to group “this in value” together. But it’s subjective and maybe others don’t struggle with the mental parsing like I do.

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@OndrejPinka With the one-liner using "in" I feel that the reader loses all sense of scope. I find myself thinking, "What does 'this in value' mean?" But that's not the right way to parse it, it's everything to the left of "in" in value (i think). Way too confusing for my simple mind. :)

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

@OndrejPinka This is not a knock on you because I've seen it used elsewhere but the one-liner using the "in" keyword here seems super hard to reason about (could just be me). While these two might be less slick, I can at least explain them to someone. #fsharp

[unmutabill @unmutabill]

Imagine if WebSharper’s biggest problem turned out to be that people assume it’s some sort of ReSharper for web development. #fsharp