@N0Tvictorinfer_ entiendo que les joda porque les está literalmente quitando el trabajo, pero de ahí a que hable de ética y moral... es como el que hacía de traductor antes, pues se queja de la IA porque le ha quitado el curro, es lo que haríamos todos (no lo justifico, me parece hipócrita)
@mghadim@Im_IrushiK I agree, I feel like Anthropic isn't focusing on research and writing actually understandable text as much as OpenAI is. claude is still better for code but chatgpt is clearer and more human
@SeHozaifa Any chatGPT model (except for, maybe, Astra) is miles behind any Claude model after Opus 5 (included). I have both, and Sol is maybe 2-3 months behind for coding, UI/UX and being "smart". Yes, usage might be slightly better, but claude is still the goat at design and coding
@TheChronium @_ak_111 @claudeai trust me, you will soon switch to 200$ claude and 20$ codex. Opus is great for code, and sonnet offers a good 3d or motion graphic performance. plus both models in the max plan have really really good limits. if you like opus' code review, try fable's too!
@MatthewBerman@bot as a 17yo multiple startup founder, this would be really useful. I'd really appreciate having the chance to try it, even if I know there's a lot of people with that hope too. Thanks anyway for giving it away
@Robertg761_ Fable literally told me the subagents' (opus 5) fixes to the codebase made the problem even worse. What did anthropic think when releasing it?