@redsphagnum@ctjlewis Just because X can be modeled computationally doesn’t mean X is computation. My point is that there might be a non-computational paradigm to explain the brain in the future
@ctjlewis If clocks compute, weather/solar system computes, etc. then saying the brain is a computer loses explanatory power because everything can be reduced to computing (pancomputationalism). In 3026 people might say 2026 people weren't wrong, X (new paradigm) is a kind of computation
@ctjlewis Will we not invent another technology more cutting edge than the computer we feel will be more representative of the brain in the future? This is the point I am trying to make