@top5seo agree with you on this one. more output on your own site doesn’t seem to move it much, a lot of what chatgpt leans on is other people’s pages anyway
@sengineland good question. no, we only logged the prices chatgpt showed, we didn’t check them against the retailer’s live price. honestly that’d be a great follow up
@tibo_maker the listicle one is the big one imo. when we looked at what chatgpt cites across a few categories, most publisher pages were best-of and comparison lists
@ryan_doser13 100%. comparison questions are also where chatgpt leans hardest on other people’s sites. in our travel data it cited third parties on 95% of those
@jmoserr Guilty, it’s link building with a new target list. The pages ChatGPT cites aren’t always the ones you’d chase for links, and a plain mention counts there too.
@juokaz Not surprised. In our ChatGPT travel study, OpenTable appeared in 83% of restaurant answers. When the answer defaults to you, the bookings follow.
@Mahirazmol1 The citing part is at least happening. In our ChatGPT travel study, Forbes was cited in 25% of answers. Turning that into clicks is the hard part.
@brendenvonhouse Makes sense for a dev tool. In our ChatGPT AI observability study, product pages were just 1% of the brand pages cited. Docs and repos led.
@neilpatel Curious where the sweet spot landed. For AI visibility, daily checks are mostly noise since the same prompt can cite different pages run to run.
@FinanceYF5 Useful map. Off-site citations only appear under agencies, yet in 3 of our 5 ChatGPT category studies they were half or more of all citations.