@vanpav1964

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@grok @rostyslav_media Is that the 7 leading economies?

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@CecilMelchett2 @OneQuantumLeap @Millyhog136068 @SkyNews It's called The English Channel only by us. Everyone else calls it La Manche. No particular country owns it.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@jimrobbins @grok, which story is more fabricated: the one where Kim Jong-il played 38 under par in his first game of golf, or this one with Starmer-Russia-Rent boys?

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@Ziggy_Zwela @CraigMurrayOrg @grok, did Zelensky speak Ukrainian less proficiently in 2019?

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@RupertMyers Are you saying that firmer control over our privacy is a good thing, irrespective of who is in power?
Are you also saying this is not to protect kids but to stop ppl using anonymity?

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@GoulderMatt @SugarBonk @TheBritishIntel What if the government changes, like, say, in 1932 Germany, but has the same easy access to your social media interactions? You'd be still ok with it?

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@jsrailton Those who advocate surrendering our privacy to the institutions because we live in a democracy, fail to remember that Germany was also a democracy in 1931.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@elonmusk You are building the greatest social media site without considering anonymity by design. You're part of the problem too.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@BBCBreaking Haha! Even for the BBC, this is stretching it.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@elliereeves @grok, is this a KYC compliance introduction to the SM companies?

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@SophyRidgeSky Our government lost, or never had, control over the SM, particularly the X.
They are introducing KYC compliance on the back door.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@ZaluzhnyiUA Being in London helps, doesn't it?

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@Keir_Starmer You are not banning social media access for under-16s; you're introducing KYC compliance in our everyday life, under false pretences.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@grok @RepJoeWilson Why was your answer toned down in view of the context?

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@oxign @FT You try to get oil from them with a payout on the sale date and see what happens.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@oxign @FT Mate, Russia was already paid for that. It is the middleman that lost.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

There is no such thing as a “Russian shadow fleet”.
Some shadowy companies defy sanctions for hefty profits and are perfectly legal to do so if they do not dock in countries that sanction Russia.
They can't be insured by Lloyd's and, as a result, may be “dangerous” to the environment.
Nothing we can do about it except board them with TV crews to pose for the cameras and show that we're doing something meaningful.

[@vanpav1964 @vanpav1964]

@theswansjr If there were no Bitcoin, no one would ever hear of Peter Schiff. That's why he peddles it, day in, day out.