@poddaccio@roydanroy 3/3 As much as I don't think that one can do science in 280 characters, I don't think one can decide who should cite whom based on keywords. I started this thread by saying that this thread was an amusement. Maybe embarrassment would be a more accurate word.
@poddaccio@roydanroy 2/3 The first one applies similar techniques to a similar domains, but the comparison mostly stops there. Moreover, as David said, it appeared after our last re-submission to Nature Physics. We will consider whether to cite it or not in our arXiv version.