update: after 1.1 years as a @cursor_ai ambassador in the UAE
well, you’ve probably already heard it from others, right? now I’m officially a @SpaceXAI ambassador 🚀😵💫
a giant leap for Juanjo and a small one for humanity?
I don’t know, nothing makes sense right now
an unexpected turn of events after all, thanks to @fildotai, @veillard_loic, @benln, @crilofer and @olgaferom2
we’ll keep hosting events across Spain and the UAE for @grok , Grok @bot, and who knows what else🚀? thanks everyone!
@victorianoi Sí, pero prohibir cosas tiene efectos impredecibles, castiga a quien no puede pagar el coste de la conducción autonoma y supone costes e ineficiencias a la hora de imponerlo
Es mejor martillear con datos de seguridad y que la transición sea natural según vaya siendo más barato
@therealmugar Y si lo metes en un grafo en vez de encajarlo a la fuerza en firebase? Y te cargas todas las queries cruzadas 🤔
no estamos en full prod todavia pero lo de las multikinds encaja bien, un paper podría ser [paper, preprint] a la vez sin hacer tantas tablas. Y tendrias FTS nativo
@zach3george @mattpocockuk Not exactly, humans and agents are not the same
Most of the time enhancing the X for one group does helps the other one, but sometimes it's quite the opposite!
@mattpocockuk And you can send agents to get unlimited AX feedback. We're enhancing our MCP & API daily. 5 days ago, Opus took 45 min to build a DB + fake seed + dashboard
After 12 rounds of frictions.md + superpowers planing & execution, we're now down to 5 min (https://t.co/fTygljLzub)
After opening 120+ issues across Dgraph, TypeDB, and SurrealDB, we gave up and built our own graph DB
Launching BlitzGraph beta: a graph database where entities keep a single ID for life and can evolve over time
Model reality here → https://t.co/fTygljLzub
#DevTools
@javilop distribución! Nosotros llevamos un tiempo construyendo algo parecido, backed by YC, mas estable y mas sencillo para usuarios no técnicos y no hemos levantado 330M simplemente por no poner el foco en la distribución como Fabian y Anton si han sabido hacer!
@Hello_World@DavidDeutschOxf > Leaded gas also led to the survival of billions” → Demonstrably false
> increased IQ by even more point because of getting proper food to people -> Probably false, no evidence
I see the advantages, but It did not cause better problems, it was objectively a bad solution
@Hello_World@DavidDeutschOxf We did not solve it, we reverted the solution
Anyways, again, its about how we define "better".
Leaded gas exposed almost everyone, dumped 7M+ tons of lead, cut global IQ by several points, and still causes millions of early deaths and ~$1T in yearly losses
@Hello_World@DavidDeutschOxf You used a fallacy (goalpost shifting) moving from lead additives to cars overall
Anyways, I’m optimistic: Just add “usually” to the statement. I agree on the resource analysis. You ditched logic for emotion, but we align on the key ideas.