@bonchieredstate Opposing the MOU is a much bigger threat because the general public can see how much it stinks. Nobody but fanatics really took Carlson's "anti-Christ" remarks seriously so there was no need to push back.
@austinjames0104@Josportgal@TalmudicLies29@marklevinshow@LauraLoomer It's not meaningless. Due to the front loading of the MOU, Iran is already selling oil with sanctions waiver from the Treasury Department. And pretty soon there's going to be a lot of unfrozen assets they get just from signing the document.
@LindseyGrahamSC "Israel will not have to tolerate being attacked by Iranian proxies who cause parts of Israel to be uninhabitable."
I guess you missed the part of the MOU where we compel Israel to forceably accept a ceasefire and refrain from defending itself against Hezbollah.
@BenMcCombe@RadioFreeTom A preventative war was what the administration claimed but I don't believe for a minute they were concerned about preventing anything (especially in light of their position now). The real reason was a gamble for regime change.
@DecodingFoxNews I agree that Iran/Contra was bad. But if you measure it in terms of the global harm it caused compared what would happen with the proposed $300 billion slush fund for Iran, it's just not in the same league.