@Cragis374558@SCCallahan1@wil_da_beast630 Do you see why the people who think evolution is a belief, however reasonably formed but not evidential, think it's silly to suggest we have *empirical* evidence about conjectures concerning reporductive patterns over millions of years?
@omgsidewalks Is it really the position you want to take that any law that gets passed was passed for legitimate reasons to address a real problem? There's never performative legislation that hurts its target beneficiaries?
@AngryNoodleHead@cafreiman I would not, in fact, expect any grassroots movement that succeeds to have a linear effect, as typically the strategy is to diffuse ideas and advocacy to a wider network of people. I'd expect exponential gains or stagnation, not linear.
@AngryNoodleHead@cafreiman Their efficacy was linear? Is it your view that labor movements, grassroots or otherwise, would be expected to have that pattern?
@KaleckiWasRight@cannot_stop_ish@lizkimtweets Is it your view that Ricardian class theory is the dominant mode of evaluating, say, social mobility, and not rigidly defined income or wealth quantiles
@taknothing@glukianoff The alternative is to read redundancy into the sentence, assuming a different kind of stupidity of the author of the tweet, and which is arguably even less charitable than assuming he meaningfully constructed a sentence to direct attention to an objectionable trait
@taknothing@glukianoff He literally used the words "right wing" in his tweet, of a guy who isn't easily construed as such. Like, this is a basic threshold question and it's so easy to evaluate to the opposite conclusion you reached that I can't fathom how you'd be considered an English speaker
@ProfKreg@EsotericCD@glukianoff You're fully permitted to be stupid, and FIRE has more or less explicitly defended that application of their argument before
@BillyVonElds@Ecclesiasticu12 That isn't what the OP is saying at all though. The examples he used, including in the screenshot, isn't "antithetical to the field". It'd be a category error to even think the positions are related, so long as we agree for example that geography is descriptive.
@Ryan_Reilly78@HannahDCox What qualifies as anti abortion or initiative exactly because in many cases roe being overturned activated existing statutes, no new law is needed, like in AZ, so I just don't know what you mean. Yeah, no one is voting for criminalizing abortion at conception, so what
@Ryan_Reilly78@HannahDCox I am utterly persuaded that Roe and its later progeny were further "left" (permissive) than what the median voter believes is acceptable, from a combination of the Pew data and recent state level fights, peoples beliefs about viability hardly lined up with what actually happened
@Ryan_Reilly78@HannahDCox Okay, so to be clear, the standard is not "did abortion restrictions get tighter at the margins", to you it must be one of the two extremes won or didn't, and if one of them lost that is "moderate"
God forbid you check the average week threshold for abortion in the country now
@Ryan_Reilly78@HannahDCox By Ls do you mean that abortion rights are *more permissive* in more states than prior to Dobbs? I assume you must, cause the Federalist Society doesn't bring cases. Members of the society litigate against each other, in fact.