"The person who writes down the thing has tremendous power.
One of the ways you find the up-and-comers at a tech company is by seeing who wrote down the plan.
That doesn't mean they came up with everything and it doesn't mean they had all the ideas, but it means they're actually able to organize their thoughts — and have the energy, motivation, and skill to communicate it in a written form."
Last day of the very special @COLM_conf !! Surprise, surprise, I am actually here to present a poster, than just tweet 😆
Stop by poster #3 this afternoon if you want to learn about training LMs entirely, and from scratch, on knowledge graphs! Why, How and What we learned.
All the startup accelerators you can apply for:
1. PearX ($250k-$2m)
2. Accel Atoms ($500k)
3. Antler ($200k for 8%)
4. Soma Capital ($100k)
5. Sequoia Arc (Variable)
6. a16z Speedrun ($750k)
7. LAUNCH ($125k for 7%)
8. OpenAI Converge ($1m)
9. Techstars ($20k for 6%)
10. Alchemist ($25k for 5%)
11. NEO ($600k Uncapped)
12. AngelPad ($120k for 7%)
13. The Mint ($500k for 10%)
14. AI2 Incubator ($50-$150k)
15. HF0 ($125k for 7% + $375k)
16. AI Grant ($250k Uncapped)
17. Betaworks AI Camp ($500k)
18. 500 Startups ($112.5k for 6%)
19. Entrepreneur First ($125k for 8%)
20. Y Combinator ($125k for 7% + $375k)
21. Conviction Embed ($150k Uncapped)
22. Founders Fellowship ($150k for 5-10%)
23. SPC Fellowship ($400k for 7% + $600k)
(More info below)
Who am I missing?
⚡️ Excited to share that I am starting an AI+Education company called Eureka Labs.
The announcement:
---
We are Eureka Labs and we are building a new kind of school that is AI native.
How can we approach an ideal experience for learning something new? For example, in the case of physics one could imagine working through very high quality course materials together with Feynman, who is there to guide you every step of the way. Unfortunately, subject matter experts who are deeply passionate, great at teaching, infinitely patient and fluent in all of the world's languages are also very scarce and cannot personally tutor all 8 billion of us on demand.
However, with recent progress in generative AI, this learning experience feels tractable. The teacher still designs the course materials, but they are supported, leveraged and scaled with an AI Teaching Assistant who is optimized to help guide the students through them. This Teacher + AI symbiosis could run an entire curriculum of courses on a common platform. If we are successful, it will be easy for anyone to learn anything, expanding education in both reach (a large number of people learning something) and extent (any one person learning a large amount of subjects, beyond what may be possible today unassisted).
Our first product will be the world's obviously best AI course, LLM101n. This is an undergraduate-level class that guides the student through training their own AI, very similar to a smaller version of the AI Teaching Assistant itself. The course materials will be available online, but we also plan to run both digital and physical cohorts of people going through it together.
Today, we are heads down building LLM101n, but we look forward to a future where AI is a key technology for increasing human potential. What would you like to learn?
---
@EurekaLabsAI is the culmination of my passion in both AI and education over ~2 decades. My interest in education took me from YouTube tutorials on Rubik's cubes to starting CS231n at Stanford, to my more recent Zero-to-Hero AI series. While my work in AI took me from academic research at Stanford to real-world products at Tesla and AGI research at OpenAI. All of my work combining the two so far has only been part-time, as side quests to my "real job", so I am quite excited to dive in and build something great, professionally and full-time.
It's still early days but I wanted to announce the company so that I can build publicly instead of keeping a secret that isn't. Outbound links with a bit more info in the reply!
The @CommonCrawl team just released all their statistics publicly ! And across all dumps, including the more recent one 🙌
Now is the time to finally analyze what's inside the source of most pre-training datasets out there 👀
1/n
# on shortification of "learning"
There are a lot of videos on YouTube/TikTok etc. that give the appearance of education, but if you look closely they are really just entertainment. This is very convenient for everyone involved : the people watching enjoy thinking they are learning (but actually they are just having fun). The people creating this content also enjoy it because fun has a much larger audience, fame and revenue. But as far as learning goes, this is a trap. This content is an epsilon away from watching the Bachelorette. It's like snacking on those "Garden Veggie Straws", which feel like you're eating healthy vegetables until you look at the ingredients.
Learning is not supposed to be fun. It doesn't have to be actively not fun either, but the primary feeling should be that of effort. It should look a lot less like that "10 minute full body" workout from your local digital media creator and a lot more like a serious session at the gym. You want the mental equivalent of sweating. It's not that the quickie doesn't do anything, it's just that it is wildly suboptimal if you actually care to learn.
I find it helpful to explicitly declare your intent up front as a sharp, binary variable in your mind. If you are consuming content: are you trying to be entertained or are you trying to learn? And if you are creating content: are you trying to entertain or are you trying to teach? You'll go down a different path in each case. Attempts to seek the stuff in between actually clamp to zero.
So for those who actually want to learn. Unless you are trying to learn something narrow and specific, close those tabs with quick blog posts. Close those tabs of "Learn XYZ in 10 minutes". Consider the opportunity cost of snacking and seek the meal - the textbooks, docs, papers, manuals, longform. Allocate a 4 hour window. Don't just read, take notes, re-read, re-phrase, process, manipulate, learn.
And for those actually trying to educate, please consider writing/recording longform, designed for someone to get "sweaty", especially in today's era of quantity over quality. Give someone a real workout. This is what I aspire to in my own educational work too. My audience will decrease. The ones that remain might not even like it. But at least we'll learn something.
Early thoughts on the Apple Vision Pro (I ended up buying directly in store last evening). I'm about 3 hours in, between late last night and this morning.
The first major thing that must be said is WOW - the visual clarity is way beyond anything that came before. But, a bit unexpectedly, this is so in some strange mixed way - your surroundings (the passhtrough) are a bit blurry and even a tiny bit laggy. But anything rendered fully virtually, e.g. a screen is very sharp and easily readable. Super cool. I mean, just the simple experience of arranging a few windows around your living room and moving around them is incredible. I feel very creative thinking through and designing my ideal setup of all the apps in my space. Mind is blown and goes places.
The second major thing is a bit less upbeat. This launch is not like the other Apple launches. It is off-brand. It is selectively and inconsistently either highly polished, or highly raw/undercooked, poorly throught through, janky or even straight up buggy. It's like some parts of the org get an A+ and some get an F. Or it's like some of them had 4 years to work on their part, and some had 4 months. It's like it was rushed a bit to "just ship" and basic UI/UX interactions weren't finished, thought-through or debugged.
Jank
Let me describe a bit some of the jank. The setup was a bit too long and janky for me. At one early point you're asked to bring your unlocked iPhone close, but you can't unlock your iPhone because your face is obviously covered so FaceID doesn't work... ?. Then I had some error connecting the phone to it so I had to go through "manual" setup. Then the sound wasn't working until I rebooted. Then I got an iMessage from a friend and I was shown a notification inside the Vision Pro about it, but when I clicked into iMessage app, it was fully empty - where is the message? When launching Guest Mode to show a friend, nothing tells you that you're supposed to also press the digital crown to activate. Very simple interactions are buggy - e.g. in the app store when I select an app to preview it and then hit back, I'm forced to for some reason go back 10 times through previously previewed apps to get back to the main screen, some bug or something. My Disney+ app never opened, it just spins forever, I'm not sure how to launch this app. When you launch Apple TV, there is zero indication or recognition of the fact that you're inside Vision Pro. No featured content, no custom content, no text indicating anything, no nothing. I'm not sure, I thought there would be a few surround videos or something? Also my brain: "$3500 for a Vision Pro? Yes two please! $9.99 for AppleTV+? Absolutely not." More generally, as you access Apple apps, a lot of them are just ignoring that you're inside a Vision Pro, and just pretending like nothing happened. I'd want new Spatial Content and interactions to be 100% front and center and featured. The "copy pasting" of stuff seems pervasive.
The raw Spatial Computing OS is there, but it's almost like the OS is all there is. The apps that take advantage in any way of "Spatial Computing" seem few and are somehow also hard to find and/or not prominently featured. There's the little blue guy app who you can poke and he laughs. There's the jet engine app, which is kind of cool, but I wasn't actually really learning anything, it felt gimmicky, like an early demo. There are some really cool environments, but why are there only 5 of them?. There's what seems to be some early grifter content on the app store, from people trying to sell you e.g. a super basic looking watch app that just shows time, for $2.99. The ability to look at your laptop and just "connect" worked the second time, and it was glorious, wow. Your screen just shows up in your living room and you can use the keyboard/mouse. Very cool.
The Vision Pro is sadly a little bit too heavy and it doesn't "disappear" due to this, even with the double strap (which is essential). I feel a bit pressure from the device on my head. But it's okay, we're at the edge of what is possible. A bunch of other small things. The world shakes a little bit with every step, especially if you land a bit harder on a heel. You have to unlearn and relearn some UIUX, because your eye gaze is now your active pointer. So you can't just look somewhere else a bit too early, before you "click" it. It's very cool that the eye tracking is so high quality.
Anyway, I'm rambling. Conclusions. The hardware itself and the core Spatial Computing OS aspects exceed my expectations. I loved sprawling on my couch, opening up a few windows, and I half-watched a movie while scrolling through web. I loved pacing around my room arranging my digital work/entertainment space. I FaceTimed a friend and we laughed about how silly my digital avatar looks, haha. I pulled up Music and played the only thing I have in it - that U2 album that was given to everyone back in 2014. nice. I'm very happy with this early preview of what could be possible, and using the current experience as a prompt to explore it.
Few recommendations to Apple come to mind: 1) eliminate simple bugs and jank. 2) fight early grifter content by featuring very very prominently any apps that are actually good, don't use dark patterns, are ideally free to try, and acknowledge in any way that the user is in a Vision Pro. 3) Consider a free subscription of AppleTV+, or maybe a $100 app gift card to those who purchase Vision Pro, so people don't lock up (?). It feels bad to pay that much money just to get in, and then immediately feeling like you're blocked behind additional pay walls, for experiences that could very well be very very raw and undercooked. 4) In general, feature a lot more prominently any content that is actually designed for spatial computing. I don't want to just put up iPad apps around me.
I am simultaneously wearing a revolution in computing, and the software to actually show me around is not just absent but what is there is mildly janky and annoying.
Ok, this concludes the section where I just "wing it" based on what I'm seeing, going in fairly blind, over the first ~3 hours. I will now do a bit more research, read more, watch some videos/tutorials, and come back for round 2.
Had an interesting conversation with 11 yo when he said he worried a lot about his schoolwork. I told him the ambitious always have some worry, but you can't let yourself be consumed by it. Even if all you cared about was work, you do better work when you're happy.
Very excited to announce that I've finished my PhD @Stanford and will be joining @Princeton CS department as an Assistant Professor in Fall 2024. Looking forward to working with students and colleagues @PrincetonCS on ML & systems!
Said the same in my @Data_AI_Summit talk today.
There's a coming wave of churn for GPT-powered features. Why?
1. Easy come, easy go. Novelty and hype will wear off
2. Trust gap. Experience enough failures, you stop trusting the system and go back to the old way
4/4 This is a wonderful collaboration with @elliottszwu, @Jimantha, and @jiajunwu_cs. We will be presenting the work #CVPR2023 on Tuesday morning. See the paper for details.
Page: https://t.co/crFuOfQh1g
Code: https://t.co/texR3Utahp