-__-

::shrug::

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@zedidutch @IntelPointAlert What’s your source that even news media don’t have?

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@ChrissyAllen79 @IntelPointAlert That’s not how swatting works

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@zoeycyberkitty @TheNathanRuff Shittiest promo ever

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@aspyhere @TheNathanRuff As you tweet from your smartphone.

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@Bubblebathgirl @atrupar Ew why are you types so soft? It’s almost like snowflake-behavior.

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@jtsmolic @CeltsHoops @WhiteHouse You’re the one defending an instigator.

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@jtsmolic @CeltsHoops @WhiteHouse He gave opinions that put others in danger. Sad you can’t tell the difference.

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@DanWall64 @MatthewSitman Promoting peace at the expenses of someone else’s peace is not peace

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@CeltsHoops @WhiteHouse He didn’t bring peace so no

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@Emilia__writes @WhiteHouse Someone doesn’t understand history

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@RedDrista @WhiteHouse Nah

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@WhiteHouse “… I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.” - Charlie Kirk

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@RyanRozbiani “… I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.” - Charlie Kirk

Died for the cause. #RIP

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@thereal_Osborne @GovPressOffice Never. What, your brain too small to learn another language?

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@skrwdrvr @GovPressOffice Post a selfie of yourself, sleeping beauty

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@K9Dirk @MLBNetwork Sorry but legit hate that random comma in the middle of your sentence

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@UnlawfulNation @Canelo More like DON’T fight @jakepaul or else risk becoming a disgrace to Mexico

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@OC_Scanner It wasn’t an issue back then. It isn’t today either. If it’s statistically a non-issue, why is the losing party so hellbent in making it an issue?

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@OC_Scanner I'm asking again since you avoided it: why is this an issue now? Why not 12-20 years ago? The losing side threw out a statistically irrelevant issue and has made it a talking point. Why?

[-__- @waitwaitcoykoi]

@OC_Scanner None of those are constitutionally protected.