the universe is a bit like an anthill within an anthill, an emergent energetic matryoshka that maintains the same principles despite drastically different sizes
Peter Thiel on how the psychedelics revolution changed introspection:
“We stopped going to outer space because we started going to inner space.”
“We landed on the Moon in July, 1969.”
“Three weeks later, Woodstock started— and that’s when the hippies took over the country.”
@reignofquality@LordIxabert It's an intrinsic urge that has been merely transcended onto something inclusively popularized, and refined by the literacy. Literacy is merely a linguistic refinery; it revectorizes propulsions into something negentropic and structurized.
Purpose of psychedelics should be essentially reitarated. One shouldn't aim for macroscalic ego's dissolution and fragmentarization, but indeed an inflation, an advancement to a higher level of organization of it.
I like fiction (specifically fantasy), considering all things, because it is highly allegorical and symmetrically reflects an asymmetrical reality, this strongly reflects certain nuances, naturally imperceptible to people, and does so paradoxically in an evocative and direct way
@Hitchslap1 Inhumane conditions in prison are, however, exclusively a thirld-world thing. First-world countries have exceptionally civilized prisons and objectively good entourage, even in circumstances of supermax prisons.
@Thermobolic@FinleySawyer1 LDL is the root cause of artherosclerosis, thoughbeit
Independently of inflammation and many other things
https://t.co/cXLtlesnh2
@M_Heidemann The effect appears only in low doses and longitundal administration. Net risk (stomach ulcers, bleeding and so on) is bigger than potentially positive effect.
I used to experiment with it and it gave me reflux.
I've never taken any official clinically validated test to assess this. The only thing that was incidentally found was AuDHD, far back when I was a child. I had to take psychometric tests in elementary school.
Albeit in the Big Five I have very high openness and extraversion, moderate neuroticism, very low conscientiousness, and agreeableness
@Hitchslap1 Midwitism, by definition, excludes any cognitive competitiveness and innovativeness. This would result in mediocrity and deep, own dissatisfaction. Genius among low IQ people, on the other hand, has the opposite circumstance.
@Hitchslap1 Genius in a low IQ country. It boils down to my personal megalomaniacal preference, even if society is not conducive to my life in many vectors in this case. I wouldn't dare to be a midwit.