I've been working on multisig (dot) sh because we were spending way too much time managing our Safes
Tried to build something closer to how I’ve always wanted to use Safe
We're pretty heavy Safe users at Stake DAO, so we've been using it a lot ourselves, and tbh, hard to use something else now. A bunch of things that used to be a pain are much easier now, especially when dealing with several Safes across different chains
Recorded a little demo below
More coming, cli to build nice automations, policies, and browser extension
Try it, it's live.
https://t.co/36X243bmwf
Heads-up for sdCRV and vlSDT holders 🐘👀
Monolith launches Swan on Thursday 22 October, 16:00 UTC. Stake DAO is a partner community: take part and you can qualify for a share of the 100,000 SWAN launch airdrop.
Steps below.
built https://t.co/7moEWDAjO2 exactly for this
your agent creates drafts, you review, simulate, propose, sign and execute
one inbox across safes and chains, with shared signing links to coordinate approvals, with no private key handed to agent at all
This may sound crazy but it’s not, set a @safe set your wallets as signers and generate a pk with no money on it give that to an AI set that wallet as a PROPOSER safe, ask the AI to generate a etherscan, alchemy and tenderly keys (free tiers are fine!)
Then when you want to do things don’t use apps, just tell your agent to build, simulate and propose a tx for you.
If you check before signing and executing on @ambire you’ll be safer that way than 99.99% of people out there.
think a lot of people are missing context on aave situation
avara/aave labs has spent past couple years developing v4 (funded with 15M DAO grant)
aci/bgd/tokenlogic/llamarisk/other SPs and the DAO have focused primarily on growing v3
during this time, v3 grew into the largest onchain lending protocol (by a wide margin) and big money maker (9+ figured net revenue per year)- by any account the dao/service provider efforts have been a huge success
while avara was developing v4, a large part of their focus was on unrelated projects or acquisitions that ended up not being value accretive to the aave ecosystem (eg lens/LC, family, etc)
now, theres a bit of disagreement on what is the go-forward strategy for aave protocol, (1) focus fully on migration to v4 and implicitly begin deprecation of v3, or (2) keep both v3 and v4 running in parallel with continued support for v3 over the long run. aave labs prefers option 1, aci+bdg+other SPs generally preferring option 2
in this context, we can see how control over the Aave brand/IP, and in particular the aavedotcom frontend (by far the most widely used entrypoint into the aave protocol) is quite important. this is not just about frontend swap fees (although these fees, estimated potentially up to 10M of annualized income, are certainly important). this is about who controls the top-of-funnel to the Aave ecosystem, and which go-forward strategy is adopted with respect to v3/v4
final twist is, it is understood that avara is no longer well capitalized, which may explain why they dug in so much on retaining the frontend swap fees initially (they need the money) when this could have been an easy offramp from the conflict that avoided deeper questions about IP ownership
disclosure: I work for Spark, which can be considered an Aave competitor. However, i also hold AAVE tokens as one of my largest positions (one of only 7 tokens i hold in material size)
@fiddyresearch Terminal vs GUI has nothing to do with the philosophy you're describing. You can run Claude Code in VS Code's integrated terminal with the same fast feedback loop. Terminal is superior precisely because it integrates with any workflow, tool, or editor
Permissionless Liquidity Mining is now live on Votemarket.
Create your campaign, select your gauge, and define your budget, max price protection, voter selection, and parameters.
Any unspent rewards are automatically bridged to Ethereum on Thursdays and redistributed through Stake DAO boosted strategies, directly rewarding LPs with no fees.
Available for Votemarket @CurveFinance, @Balancer, and @pendle_fi mainnet gauges.
Migration to Staking V2 is live.
All Stake DAO Onlyboost Boosted @CurveFinance vaults on mainnet have officially moved to Staking V2.
Thread with details below:
I'm afraid if we put the blame on SAFE instead of Bybit here, we are learning entirely the wrong lesson fom this as a space.
Frontends should _always_ be assumed compromised.
If your signing process doesn't accommodate that, you're ultimately still at fault.
With Votemarket V2 released last week leveraging Ethereum Storage Proofs, we break down how storage proofs enable trustless state verification and enable many use cases - from fundamental data structures to verification mechanisms.
Read more⬇️
Stake DAO unveils the next evolution of vote incentives. Streamlining governance rewards with flexible claiming and cross-platform support.
🚀 Introducing Votemarket v2:
• Multi-week reward distribution
• Full vote supply coverage
• Fallback strategies
• Point incentive systems
⬇️
All the @CurveFinance $CRV Newsletters / Articles rooms:
"Convex is back; the flywheel effect"
"Curve is alive, locks are on fire"
"Yearn Boosted Staker is game changer"
"Again, Curve showed its resiliency"
Meanwhile, Stake DAO $sdCRV locked 9M $CRV
Guess you noticed @CurveFinance was the center of attention yesterday.
Did you also notice the $CRV influx in the $asdCRV compounder?
🚀 3,000,000 $CRV added in the last 24hrs, taking the total TVL of the vault to over $5M USD / 17.6M $sdCRV! @StakeDAOHQ 🤯
🎉 Stake DAO's $CRV Liquid Locker, the most pegged liquid CRV wrapper for 2 years, attracted 5 million CRV in 24 hours, reaching 70 million $CRV locked and becoming the second-largest $veCRV lock on @CurveFinance! 🐘👀