This 2-minute clip exposes how Big Pharma turns healthy people into patients.
“The purpose … is to sell products.”
“You’re medicalizing healthy people.”
Watch Jeffrey Tucker and Alan Cassels break down how annual checkups get healthy people on Big Pharma’s drug pipeline:
Tucker: “This whole idea of a wellness checkup … it seems like it’s just a sales funnel.”
Cassels: “The annual checkup has been studied quite rigorously since about 1975.”
“Do people who go to their doctor when they’re perfectly healthy every year for an annual checkup … live longer and healthier lives?”
“When you study that in a good controlled trial, you find actually the opposite.”
“People who submit themselves to the wellness check actually become more and more worried about their health.”
“Because suddenly they’re living a life under a dark cloud.”
“Somebody told them: you have high cholesterol.”
“Or your blood pressure is borderline.”
“Or your bone density is possibly not what it should be.”
“If you are actually sick [or] actually have symptoms of something … get to your doctor.”
“But if you’re an otherwise healthy person living a normal life, the doctor visit is not going to make your life better.”
@jeffreytucker@AKECassels@brownstoneinst
God I wish I was there. I would ask that "cancer expert" whose last name starts with G to explain to me what introduction by transfection of a strong mammalian promoter would do to a cell. I would also ask her if she even knows the constituents of the nucleoside modified RNA-LNP COVID-19 injectable products.
@LawrenceGostin failed to utter the smallest peep when licensing boards went after physicians for spreading what they deemed "COVID misinformation."
But now he's all "human rights" concerned.
This kind of blatant hypocrisy is why trust in public institutions has plummeted. People see the political game.
🛑REVERSED: A San Francisco federal judge ruled in 2024 that water fluoridation poses an unreasonable risk to children, capping four years of litigation and a record that included the largest scientific review of fluoride data ever conducted. The National Toxicology Program's August 2024 analysis found that 18 of 19 low-risk-of-bias studies reported inverse associations between fluoride exposure and IQ scores in children, and 17 of those were statistically significant.
The Ninth Circuit just overturned that ruling on a technicality. Because the case was filed in 2020, the court determined that Judge Chen should have ruled only on evidence available at that time, meaning the NTP review, the JAMA findings, and everything else the scientific record produced during four years of active litigation must be set aside. The court is not disputing the science. It is saying the science arrived too late to count.
The practical result is that water fluoridation continues while the case is reset, the evidence accumulated over four years is treated as irrelevant, and any new legal challenge will take another five to ten years to work through the same system. The children drinking fluoridated water in the meantime are not afforded the same technicality.
The next step is an appeal to the Supreme Court, where the question will be whether the highest court in the country is willing to engage with what the science now clearly shows is happening to the IQs of American children.
👇
@maryhollandnyc@CHDTVLive@ChildrensHD@KimMRosenberg Watch what happens with Lyme disease medicines and proposed vaccines. We now have 11 live PREP Act declarations including Hanta. We might see another for Lyme vax. It keeps going on and on and on.
@matthewshaw1111 I believe in the near future, another PREP Act declaration will be announced for Lyme disease vax and meds. That will be the 12th active PREP Act. God Help Us
@GrageDustin get rid of these ridiculous endorsement conventions. all candidates go to primary. these conventions force candidates to the extremes, waste money.
@HelenBranswell The specific strain of Ebola was not prevalent before this outbreak, thus WHO and others considered the Zaire and Sudan strains as priority.
@GodsRiddles Yep, what happened to the child in Vermont, clear case of battery to a minor by admin of vaccine w/o parental consent, the State Supreme Court ruled against the child because of The PREP Act.