This is INSANE.
If one juror has doubts about guilt but is refusing to vote NOT GUILTY, that juror is not entitled to manufacture a guilty verdict simply because they refuse to move.
Reasonable doubt = NOT GUILTY.
And the State is actually OBJECTING to removing this juror?
The system is not supposed to be about forcing a mistrial just so the state can try again at all costs.
the Clancy case is proof that most of you would not make good jurors. it’s not your job as a juror to play morality police. you are strictly to examine the evidence presented in court & decide your verdict. not be the harbinger of what your opinion of justice is.
they should be removing him from the jury, voting guilty while admitting he has reasonable doubt is ridiculous and it should not be declared a mistrial
It's confirmed from Kevin Reddington now - the 1 juror holding out is a guilty voter who says they have reasonable doubt and is refusing to apply that to the verdict. It's also a man.
Olivia wore a custom dress made by Palestinian label Nöl Collective, who works alongside Gazan artisan workshops and family owned businesses. It has embroidered a tatreez, a traditional palestinian pattern!
To honor Lilith Fair, she also wore a Lilith necklace.