@sltrib You don’t get to use the taxes for state parks to help pay for your tickets to Lagoon, even if you'd really rather take your kids there instead of Goblin Valley.
@AltaSkiArea@RobLowe @SonofVBeach Better resolutions:
1. Post updates about interlodge for those of us who have been stuck here for the last two days
2. Actually open your resort
3. Stop reposting Rob Lowe
One of the secrets that UDOT won't tell you is that #sr210 doesn't experience a lot of congestion except on high traffic ski days waiting to go up the canyon.
The Salt Lake Tribune’s Robert Gehrke argues more practical options — including tolling, trailhead fees, parking reservations and a closer look at Little Cottonwood Canyon’s carrying capacity — should be given a true chance before a gondola is built in the canyon.
@WasatchSnow Thanks for posting this. It seems like most supporters of the gondola think that it would be able to transport the majority of canyon users, when it can only carry about 15%!
@fromtheAtotheU @fox13 The gondola has a capacity of only 1000 people / hour. For reference, the canyon can get 20,000+ skiers on busy ski days. Packing gondola full from 7-10am only gets 15% of skiers up.
@JaredPoulson@fox13 The gondola has a capacity of only 1000 people / hour. For reference, the canyon can get 20,000+ skiers on busy ski days. Packing gondola full from 7-10am only gets 15% of skiers up.
Despite overwhelming public outcry about this proposed option from local, state, and community leaders, @UDOT choose the gondola to service Little Cottonwood Canyon. Share repost and let your voice be heard during the public comment period.