frog

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@andrebttx @NOMANCANSTOPME @MaxDamage9999 I'm going to disagree a bit here. These aren't normal boosters, so the rarities are serving a more product-specific role. It's probably somewhere on a spectrum between EDH precons and normal pack boosters, but it's definitely not the same as the latter.

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@MaxDamage9999 @TGruneich what has the community decided, that they are not "respecting"?

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@DanicaPriest @LesterJMilton @AndyMasley the shill fallacy, as the post above you says, is dismissing an argument by pointing to someone's funding source. nothing to do with "evidence." conflict of interest is not relevant to the the discussion.

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@matthewstoller @gelliottmorris Which of those things is autocratic?

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@micahsb @loganb Yeah I am not so confident they're actually succeeding in building factional power despite some prominent successful politicians

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@questionableway since it's self-reported I think we have to assume an inclusive interpretation of "video games"

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ckieser13 @dilanesper "pretty clear" and "common sense" aren't much of an argument, but to be fair you're under no obligation to try and persuade

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@danielmwarwick I literally thought this was satire but it's a real thing lol

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ckieser13 @dilanesper I do not deny that there are biological differences between men and women, though. "[Basic] fairness" is more complicated and contextual. E.g. some sports have weight classes and others do not. It's not obvious that all sports or contexts should have rigid sex segregation.

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ForeskinDvourer @ZecaPande @GavinVerhey that seems like probably the right call to be but I'll admit it's close and doesn't match the language of the legality definition, which they should update.

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ckieser13 @dilanesper this is the key claim you need to defend

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ForeskinDvourer @ZecaPande @GavinVerhey oh well if it's common because of this printing and baleful strix isn't then that's very dumb.

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ForeskinDvourer @ZecaPande @GavinVerhey I don't think "is randomization involved" is a meaningful line to draw, as although they are used to allocate product, it's in a manner quite different from their function in booster packs of normal sets. Can you explain what you mean about Narcomoeba? It was originally uncommon.

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@dilanesper even though it's much more interesting & strategic!

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@machine_glow @LinkofSunshine Well and the second thing you mentioned is really important. You don't want false flags or (even more) opportunistic lawyers mucking things up for those who are directly involved. These are already problems but would be much worse

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ForeskinDvourer @ZecaPande @GavinVerhey Apparently it has "packs" but not normal ones. https://t.co/vcts7rOMpX

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ForeskinDvourer @ZecaPande @GavinVerhey Oh. That is definitely weird. I guess then the only potentially remaining line is something squishier like "is released/distributed through normal channels" and I'm not even sure that isn't already not correct

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@HummingbirdRSO @HughLouisDewey Not without evidence!

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@arnoblalam @JeremiahDJohns

[frog @whiffle_frog]

@ForeskinDvourer @ZecaPande @GavinVerhey Wait, why/how is SLZ a set?