WTF Jack

I am what I am.
-Popeye-

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

WTF

[WilliWilliWilli @politicalwilli]

A play on 4 acts : Act I : Infiltration :

watch as a “crazy” guy appears from behind the secure part of the Capitol from behind police lines : Inserted

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

@XwitterDX @MattisRedacted @Offmetaygo I never argued whether or not the Quran verses were in context. However, it's kind of hard to make an argument about others using verses or of context when you do the same, and with feigned righteous indignation.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

@RealChiefPriest Not the first. Won't be the last. Definitely don't believe I'm getting any money. But it was fun for the about 30-45 seconds it took me to get lucky on the pause.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

@herotimeszero Those second term numbers are impressive when you consider it's only been 9 months and Obama's numbers are based on eight years.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

Two parts to it. First, as was pointed out, it would be poetic that he be forced to listen to the message Charlie was preaching. But not for torture - because hopefully, God willing, he will understand what a terrible act of violence he committed against a person that was trying to bring peace through dialogue. The other part is, maybe in listening to Charlie's message he may find salvation.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

@Mar_tin6704 @Girlpatriot1974 It has more to do with the appeals process after the initial trial. Usually takes a couple years from when a person is initially apprehended/detained to when they are executed.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

They tried during the election cycle and were rebuffed immediately and resoundingly. Any chance you recall them on boats going around the "MAGA Navy" (I think that's what the liberals and MSM called them) trying to elicit racist remarks, or at the very least support for racism, then getting smacked with wake by the MAGA boats because no one in MAGA supports racial supremacy?

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

I was referring to how the law approached determining right of way to augment your answer by adding why the norm is as it is. Similar to pairing a physics assignment with your calculus so people can see why the math is used, and not just a bunch of numbers, variables, and/or trig functions.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

Right of way is more a matter of who interrupts the flow of traffic the least. In the scenario above, 2 does not break the flow of routine traffic, and so has the primary right of way. After that, three will only interrupt the flow of one lane of traffic, and so has the next right of way. 1 has the lowest priority because they have to interrupt flow of both lanes to execute their maneuver, even if they didn't have the yield sign, but that is also why they have the yield sign.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

39, counting only places that I've sat and had a meal that was not at the airport. I've flown and driven through several more of the cities listed, but that was the criteria I set when I started counting states I've visited (I've been to all 50 now, half of Canada, a little over half of Central America, and several countries in Europe) back in the day.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

There were highly respected scientists that refuted the Wuhan lab leak explanation for COVID. 4 out of 5 doctors recommended Camel brand cigarettes. Salt is bad for you. Eggs increase cholesterol. The list of scientific facts or agreed upon norms that have been disproven or refuted are innumerable.

The increase of ASD in children coinciding with the increase of vaccines in the vaccine schedule requires us to look into causes. Aluminum being a known neurotoxic substance, coupled with significantly higher concentrations of Aluminim in brain tissue samples from people that suffered from ASD, MS, and alzeimers than in healthy brain tissue means that there is a causative factor being introduced by something we're doing. It is a fact that aluminum is the most common adjuvant for vaccines and the number of vaccines required has increased significantly in the past 40 years. Interestingly enough, even manufacturers aren't sure how much aluminum will be dispensed in any given shot, even in the same batch. It could be statistically significantly more, or less, even within the same batch (https://t.co/7aUQAdn9PC). With this in mind, it brings into question the studies that refuted any correlation between vaccines and neurological disorders even moreso than simply the known neurotoxicity of aluminum.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

Re-read what I said. The natural defenses are for ingestion and inhalation, because aluminum is so common we inhale and ingest it all day every day. You're either not fully reading what I said, or being intentionally obtuse. I would prefer to believe you didn't read my post to understand, but rather to remark, but the latter is equally possible.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

Little, if any, which was my point against using it as an adjuvant. Some people are able to process it out all the same, which is why there are people that do not develop alzheimers, ASD, and MS as a result of getting vaccinated. Others do, and it with the increased dosing per the vaccine schedule, appears to be becoming more frequently seen.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

Aluminum has been found to be at significantly elevated levels in persons suffering from alzheimers, ASD, and multiple sclerosis. That means removing mercury, which is known to have a stronger bond with hemoglobin than oxygen rather than collecting in neurl tissues, would not decrease autism rates.

Before you attempt to counter with aluminum being the most abundant metal on earth, so much so that we inhale and ingest it all day, every day of our lives, understand that the body has processes to remove aluminum from the body when encountered in those entry ways. With a vaccine, we bypass the natural defenses we have to protect against aluminum getting into our blood stream.

I'm glad he pointed out the correlation between allergies and the type of adjuvant that is used in vaccines. I've been saying that for years, even though I do not hold a medical degree. It is common sense that this would be a potential causative factor, as allergic reactions are, in simplest terms, the immune system incorrectly identifying a substance as harmful or dangerous. As such, one of the mechanisms used by the immune system to remove harmful substances is swelling, which when the response is overly active, is anaphylaxis. If you're introducing a normally benign substance for the purpose of inducing a more significant immune response, it is a logical progression to assume that a potential byproduct would be the immune system incorrectly identifying that substance as harmful or dangerous, and yhen learning to create a response when it sees that substance in the future.

Washington ordered the first innoculation (at least in Nirth America) during the revolutionary war. However, their process was to create three incisions on the arm (creating a break in the body's protective layer, inducing a large scale immune response to attack any foreign materials that entered), then smearing the puss from a person infected with small pox into the wounds (introducing weakened and dead virii for the immune system to create antibodies against). It worked very well, with the main problem being the scars created by the process (not so much that it was a problem back then, but it would not be a permissible process in modern times). This proves that processes can be formulated and effected to protect us from diseases.

I'm not arguing that all vaccines are bad, or that the concept of introducing a weakened or inert disease into the system for the purpose of permitting the immune system to develop a response so that it can protect itself when it is exposed to a live virus is a bad idea. I'm only arguing that the solution we currently have seems to be as bad as the problem. The argument that fewer children are dying neglects that the quality of their life is not maintained or improved by our current methods, in comparison to the children that survived in the past. To another point that was made earlier, proper sanitation and hygiene lead to far more significant increases in both quality and quantity of life than vaccines have, thus far.

https://t.co/NmpIp2iHtS

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

From what I've read, with the limited details that have been released at this point, it seems like clear self defense for the murder charges, especiallly since one of the attackers has a firearm ehen they initiated the attack. The other state specific charges related to concealed carrying without a license (which is a bullshit charge constitutionally, but @USSupremeCourt, except Justice Thomas who has called them out for this, has refused to handle any substantial 2nd amendment cases since reviewing DC's law), could hold weight. Otherwise, the responses about a drug deal or other bullshit appear uncorroborated at this time, with the information that has been made public.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

You are correct, they had no business there. The warrant was issued on falsified premises, and never would have been approved without them.

No-knock raids, especially ones conducted by plain clothes cops, should be outlawed federally, and they create an unnecessary and devastatingly dangerous scenario for both the police and, more importantly, the citizens. It is great that Louisville has since outlawed no-knock warrants.

In regards to the cops having no right to fire back, the responding officers executed the warrant with the belief that the underlying information was true and relevant, in a manner that was considered lawful at the time. As such, they had every right to respond in kind after being shot at by Walker.

From Walker's perspective, he also had every right to shoot when the no-knock warrant was executed. Even if the officers were in uniform, Walker's had no reason to assume the people breaching his door were there lawfully or for the general good. The law worked as it should have in dropping the charges, even though he shot first.

The outrage at Hankison's charges and penalty being reduced are understandable, but aimed in the wrong direction, in my opinion. The real outrage should be directed at the injustice of the two officers that falsified the evidence that justified the warrant in the first place. None of what happened that night would have occurred had the warrant not been granted. The responsibility for what happened lies on the officers that, and they alone should face the punishment.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

Both sides agree that this is a problem. Where they disagree is the solution.

One side says that allowing people to keep more of their money, while also working towards making the cost of goods cheaper (through cheaper energy costs, fewer mandated regulations, and less profit sent to the government) will help alleviate this. However, it depends on businesses passing their savings on to the consumer, which is not consistent, let alone guaranteed.

The other side believes increasing an individual's income, through raising the minimum wage, will help by providing more takehome pay. However, it also assumes that businesses will absorb the increased payroll cost rather than reducing their workforce and/or passing the increases on to the consumer. Historically, we've seen small businesses close in response to minimum wage hikes (yes, other small businesses do get created, but there is a lag between this transition where people are unemployed, and so have to find new employment and/or absorb a significant amount of debt to maintain a minimum standard of liviing) while bigger corporations cut hours, reduce staff, and raise prices. All of this created inflation, which counteracts any good from raising minimum wage.

Both solutions have been tried, and more success has been observed, anecdotally, from reducing regulations and corporate taxes, than from raising the minimum wage. For example, during Trump's first term, the economy grew significantly, while inflation stayed around 1% annually. It wasn't until the pandemic hit, and businesses were forced to close temporarily while the government went on a spending spree for 18'ish months, that we saw inflation spike significantly. Of course, those gains were short lived, and even without the pandemic spending spree the government still added a significant amount to the national debt.

There will need to be additional measures taken to get the economy back to where a single income family is feasible, but reducing government spending, and lowering the cost of business are two steps that need serious consideration.

[WTF Jack @whskytng0fxtrt]

@FoMaHun, I get that it is a loaner unit, but are you handy enough to fashion a "shield," for lack of a better way of saying it, that you can create a good enough seal between the XRF and sample so that the helium can have a chance of removing the interference from normal atmospheric molecules? The real purpose of the chamber is to create a smaller volume to evacuate so you're not wasting helium unnecessarily. Vacuum achieves the same outcome, at a fraction of the cost, but requires a perfect seal, hence actually needing a sample that can fit into a chamber. If you do try this, you will want to ensure that the helium is, at the very least, removing the "air" between your measure head and the sample.

[Kaizen D. Asiedu @thatsKAIZEN]

I’m open to the possibility that the Trump admin isn’t part of an Epstein cover up.

The cover up likely started - and maybe ended - before they took office.

We don’t need them to declassify every file.

We do need them to put every child rapist in prison.

Two people did not molest over a thousand women and children alone.

If finding the rest requires exposing a cover up the Trump admin didn’t create, so be it.

That’s what they were elected for.

That’s part of draining the swamp.

If they can’t, they should say so, honestly and directly.

Trump brushing off the Epstein case as something to move on comes across as tone-deaf.

People still care. People should care.

The Epstein case is not timely.

But it is important.