wonderbaloon

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@prakashraaj Happy mother's day

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@dmuthuk Sarcasm to the dizzying Heights.

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@IndianGems_ Downfall due to hacking the EVM

[natrajkumar - தமிழ்நாட்டை தலைகுனிய விடமாட்டேன்! @kumarmadurai]

@sunnewstamil

[Akira 🌱தமிழன் 🎶 @NiteshThoughts]

@sunnewstamil keralam students 🔥righteousness and intelligent remarks about this topic pm shri school is not proper title instead of gov school . let we speak about this topic also

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@EconomicTimes What happened to Indian satellites? So much launches were done in the last 50 to 60 years. Why don't the indian broadcasters use indian satellites.

[We The People @WithYou2023]

Brahmins exploited women in the name of dharma. Manuwaad designed it. Golwalkar praised it. Subhashini Ali exposed it.

In Kerala, for centuries, Namboodiri Brahmin men practised “Sambandham” — temporary sexual alliances with Nair women. No marriage, no rights for the woman or her children. The children stayed in the mother’s matrilineal Nair tharavad while Brahmin men walked away.

This was not love. This was systematic exploitation in the name of religion and custom.
And who defended it? Former RSS chief M.S. Golwalkar himself praised Sambandham, claiming it “improved the Nair breed.��

This is exactly what Manuwaad preached and practised for centuries. Manu Smriti explicitly allowed “anuloma” cross-breeding — higher-caste (especially Brahmin) men with lower-caste women — to produce “superior” offspring while strictly forbidding the reverse. The goal? Maintain Brahminical racial and social supremacy through selective breeding disguised as dharma.
Golwalkar didn’t just tolerate these dogmas — he applauded them. He admired Manusmriti and saw the caste order as the divine blueprint for Hindu society.

At the recent International Conference at University of Kerala (Feb 2026), CPI(M) leader and veteran women’s rights activist Subhashini Ali courageously called this out in her Dr. Deepak K R Memorial Lecture on “Women’s Struggles in India: Capitalism, Labour, and Resistance.”
She has spent decades fighting for women’s dignity, exposing how casteism and Brahminical supremacy are the root cause of India’s most vile evils — gender violence, untouchability, child marriage, widow ostracism, honour killings, and the denial of education and autonomy to millions.

When Brahmins exploit in the name of religion, it’s not tradition — it’s power. India cannot progress until we dismantle this toxic supremacy.
This is the uncomfortable truth.

#BrahminicalSupremacy #ManuwaadExposed #SubhashiniAli #Manusmriti #GolwalkarExposed #CasteIsTheRoot
#Golwalkar #RSS #Kerala
@SuhasiniAli

[𝙄𝙣𝙗𝙖 𝐌𝐫 𝙃𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙨𝙩 @im__inba1]

வீடியோவின் தமிழ் மொழிபெயர்ப்பு:
"இந்தியாவின் தமிழ்நாட்டில் 90% இந்துக்கள் உள்ளனர் மற்றும் நாட்டின் அதிகப்படியான கோவில்களும் அங்கேதான் உள்ளன.
ஆனால், அங்கே பா.ஜ.க-விற்கு (BJP) ஒரு சீட் கூட கிடையாது... புரிகிறதா?
நாட்டின் மிகச்சிறந்த அறிவுள்ள இந்துக்கள் அங்கேதான் உள்ளனர்... மற்றவர்கள் எல்லாம் 'லண்ட் பக்த்' (Lund Bhakt - ஹிந்தியில் கிண்டலான சொல்)."
அதாவது ஆணுறுப்பை சொல்லி பக்தர் என்று சொல்லி கிண்டல் செய்வது அல்லது ஏசு��து.

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@tamilravi @thapli69 You are absolutely correct

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@tamilravi @kskiyer You are absolutely correct

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@BigWave372 So, This video is a Big bluff.

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@_GlobeObserver Pakistani BLUFF

[India Today Global @ITGGlobal]

Iran’s response to US-led strikes is now raising larger questions around the global role of the dollar.
At the Strait of Hormuz, new conditions tied to oil transit are signalling a potential shift in currency dynamics.
The development comes amid rising tensions and disruptions in key energy routes.
It adds a fresh layer to the conflict, with implications beyond the battlefield.
Watch #Statecraft with @Geeta_Mohan only on #IndiaTodayGlobal
🔗https://t.co/YF9rl4I1Rt

#IranUSWar #StraitOfHormuz #DeDollarisation #GlobalEconomy #Geopolitics #IndiaTodayGlobal

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@UsMilitaryy @grok is the news true

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@Swamy39 @tnhrcedept Subramania Swamy gave Economic advise to Rajapakse brothers when they were in power. Then srilanka went bankrupt and there was revolution and rest is history.

[wonderbaloon @wonderbaloon]

@QTHESTORMM @grok is the above posting true.

[Prashant Bhushan @pbhushan1]

What Happened to Sadhguru's Wife?
Did Sadhguru's wife die from enlightenment, as he claims, or was it foul play?
Must Read: American Journalist Be Scofield’s detailed investigation & analysis
https://t.co/ah9H0KnHca

[M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired) @MNageswarRaoIPS]

Dear Michael Rubin @mrubin1971,

The only “Modi Doctrine” that Indians actually experience—and endure—is the systematic surrender of India's national interests to protect one man's grip on power.

The second pillar of this so-called “Modi Doctrine” is relentless propaganda: layer upon layer of manufactured narrative, exaggeration, and denial. If Josef Goebbels were alive today, he would not merely applaud—he would enroll as an eager intern in Modi's propaganda machinery, taking notes on how to scale industrial-scale deception in the digital age.

The third tenet of this so-called “Modi Doctrine” is mob rule by digital foot soldiers: unleash armies of paid trolls and flunkeys to swarm, smear, and intimidate anyone who dares criticise Modi’s anti-India regime or expose its corrupt dealings. Their default question is always the same: "How much did the opposition pay you?"—as if truth can only be bought, never spoken.

The fourth aspect of this so-called “Modi Doctrine”, and perhaps most insidious, is the wholesale purchase or co-option of institutions: media houses turned stenographers, academics silenced or rewarded, intellectuals bought off or sidelined—all to whitewash crony deals, hide failures, and deify a leader who demands worship while delivering division and decay.

This is the lived reality under Modi's corrupt, anti-India regime—a far cry from the grandiose "Modi Doctrine" you advocate in your piece, which casts him as the guardian of the Indian Ocean against Chinese predation.

So I must ask directly: What exactly is the quid pro quo that prompted you to pen this fawning, detached-from-reality op-ed? Whose interests are you truly advancing here?

Looking forward to your candid reply.