Kate Darling questions whether we need conscious robots even if this is possible? Is she right? Might such entities reason in a way we can’t understand? New episode at https://t.co/pCZTKW1h5W
Does work have intrinsic value? If so what are the consequences in an age of AI automation or when we become old or infirm? New podcast at
https://t.co/XXKFT3PbEZ
https://t.co/iQzeuGv5kZ but apologies for production quality
Good palliative care is essential for terminally ill patients but doing so doesn’t make the question of assisted suicide go away, new episode at woolerscottus
A failure to respect persons is wrong. Rudeness fails to respect the views of others and is wrong. But rudeness is wrong in a different way. Mill argued failing to attend to the views and arguments of others damages us by denying us potential knowledge.
https://t.co/49DDlXoo9C
Does the need to love explain the difference between a nihilist and a terrorist? Nihilists have lost their need to love and be loved whilst terrorists have retained theirs even if this is misplaced. https://t.co/1yshm6fosL
Do purely private misogynistic or racist thoughts which never be acted on matter? If morality is solely concerned with actions, no. if character matters, yes perhaps morality should be limited to actions but character leaks into them
https://t.co/3G95K47OlS
Stoics have problems with hope and aspiration because they make them vulnerable. Kant argued that hoe matters more than a simple emotion. Was he right? Is hope connected to our identity?. https://t.co/GGJgjEQZC5
Let us accept the death penalty is wrong, if so some offenders will serve lifelong sentences, for example Lucy Letby. Should such offenders have a right to assisted suicide if they so desire? https://t.co/vddU2DL2My
Playing sport has instrumental value because it increases our fitness and helps us to socialise. Does it also have intrinsic value due to achievement? Id so then perhaps a lonely long distance runner us doing something which has intrinsic value https://t.co/i05p15vO1n
Are those who disrupted the Grand National guilty of grandstanding or even self- indulgence? Their actions focussed attention on their disruption rather than three dead horses
Should the Royal family apologise for slavery? Apology involves some guilt. Individuals can be guilty but families? Regret and reparations may be due even if when apology isn’t. In some cases apology is an insincere, trendy and easy option https://t.co/FrdKy9LvVP
The dangers of advanced AI. https://t.co/Lv1EvllHDv Wittgenstein asked if a lion could speak we couldn’t understand him. Seems a trivial question but matters when considering advances AI https://t.co/iT2R7sLmsN
Do we as a nation or as individuals need to apologise for past slavery? Much apology is simply grandstanding but a duty to compensate might exist even if harder to do https://t.co/W0VOo0j7jo
World’s scientists say 1.5C still achievable but ‘humanity on thin ice’ https://t.co/oi8mam1aaR Also what duties do we owe to ecological refugees due to global warming? https://t.co/jn169piSqr