Senior Meteorologist somewhere focused on quantitative ag wx, formerly known as an NWS meteorologist // tech buff, scotch lover // PhD Atmospheric Science
@Drlipid Do you have a post somewhere about the current best intervention(s) for someone with genetically high Lp(a) 250ish in her mid 30s with very low LDL-C/APOB?
@skdh We should reward quality over quantity. Simply aren't enough hours in the day to both churn out papers to make the admins happy and to put in the thought and effort required for discovering the next big thing. And people wonder why science seems to be so incremental these days.
@elonmusk@elonmusk you should use xAI to improve weather forecasting. It's a crowded field but there's substantial upside if its done right, especially if you focus on long ranges
@JeninYounesEsq@AllysiaFinley Don't think this is new. The new thing that stands out to me is this nonsense that consensus (ie. approved narrative) equates to good science. Science and consensus have no business being in the same phrase.
@SnazzyLabs Sounds like they are divisive but they also have a reasonable return policy so umm.... Who cares? Don't like it? Return it and hit up dbrand or whomever you prefer.
That's more or less what I've thought also. Regardless of how it pans out, I think it's pretty clear that AI won't replace conventional NWP, but rather will augment it. It's a team sport.
Also, regarding your statement that probabilistic forecasts are useful... I think way too many consumers of them have trouble turning them into actionable insights (e.g. forecasts are probabilistic but decisions are deterministic). Maybe AI can help in that regard as well.