J Squiggle

[J Squiggle @wyrdian]

@KeroKeroBug @Elesthor @thelindsayellis @tomscott Good point; Scott's write-up makes it seem that way to me, but I can't find anything explicit about it because the only stuff about it is in archives.

[J Squiggle @wyrdian]

@Elesthor @thelindsayellis @tomscott He's not being woke enough, apparently, because he's not willing to cancel someone who disavowed the supposedly bad thing she wrote years ago.

[J Squiggle @wyrdian]

@Elesthor @thelindsayellis @tomscott It's not about this video, it's about something(s) Jill Bearup tweeted years ago and has since deleted.

[J Squiggle @wyrdian]

@WoobieTuesday Yes.

[J Squiggle @wyrdian]

@JordanCMulligan @ChrisMasterjohn @joerogan @chriskresser @lightningwilks It's actually the opposite. The hypothesis tested is "X causes Y"; the null hypothesis is "X has no causal relationship to Y". The hypothesis is supported in 16% of studies, and the null hypothesis is supported in 84%. Null hypothesis is not rejected.

[J Squiggle @wyrdian]

@fuze59 @PeterAttiaMD Diet *should* affect serum cholesterol. Human evolutionary history is one of increasing consumption of cholesterol, and if the body won't change its chol. production when exogenous sources are so available, that's an inefficiency that will be selected out.