@Tillo826@SeanBarieTV@FOX13News My point exactly! We didn’t even need this extra angle, the review center had enough information given the placement of his foot and his hand/the ball in relation to that foot when it came loose. Horrible missed call.
@GStanley71@SeanBarieTV@FOX13News Then you’re blind lmao. The ball clearly is not past his front foot when it’s dislodged. His front foot is short of the goal line. Even before this angle it was clear
I was set up at about the 1.5 yard line during Kyle Pitts' controversial second touchdown.
So here's my view of it. I tried to focus into when I believe the ball started to come out. The more I watch this, the more I think the refs got the call of TD wrong.
@FOX13News
@Jumpman949@Michael31736855@FPWellman @WhistleblowerLF If Kamala were being asked to prove she never worked at mcdonalds, then that would be similar, but that’s not the case. You can’t prove a negative but you can easily disprove a negative.
@Jumpman949@Michael31736855@FPWellman @WhistleblowerLF So disingenuous. You can easily prove that you worked at McDonald’s and that removes all doubt. You can easily provide evidence that someone said something with video or actually named sources. You can’t prove you never said something without recording your entire life.
@KAYDONPETEFAN @IamJackGerard @c_keeler@jeffzrebiec Only if he’s doing it to avoid pressure or a sack, but that 100% should be intentional ground too, as well as illegal touching. That’s how the rule is written and it’s unfair otherwise. Thats not a problem at all
@KAYDONPETEFAN @IamJackGerard @c_keeler@jeffzrebiec The rule having the word “grounding” in it means nothing. You have to read what the rule actually says and how it defines its terms.
@OffyUnfiltered@NFLOfficiating The rules as written make it clear this should’ve been grounding though. Perhaps they’ll add a case example, but as the rule is written there is no logical way to say this isn’t intentional grounding
@footballzebras There’s no way replay could reverse that safety call. For starters with a penalty, the player’s whole body has to be out of the end zone to avoid a safety. Furthermore, the ball wasn’t even completely out of the end zone by the time he let go. I agree on grounding
@chewtunes @NFLOfficiating I agree the refs got it wrong, but if you watch the whole game replay, you’ll see the refs inexplicably called Sanchez down by forward progress in the end zone, and did not actually rule this intentional grounding
@KAYDONPETEFAN @IamJackGerard @c_keeler@jeffzrebiec “Lands” throughout the rule book is used to mean “hits the ground or is possessed by a player”
Regardless if this ball didn’t “land”, like you said, that also would not meet the definition of “realistic chance of completion” and therefore still be intentional grounding
@JoJoFromJerz As a server, no tax on tips would be incredible. I see 0 way how no tax on tips doesn’t help servers. I also fail to see how it helps business owners other than keeping their employees happier