BofA (Woodward): Since late May investors have fled the perceived risks from unfriendly global central banks and profligate tech borrowers.
The Magnificent Seven “hyperscalers” have spent $234B in capex this year, but their stocks are up just 0.5%. The free cash flow of these companies is expected to turn negative over the next twelve months for the first time since at least 2007.
Rallies of 10-40% in sectors like communications, tech, semiconductors, and other growth stocks have reversed in June (Exhibit 5).
Investors kept buying small caps and started buying the losers: financials, down as much as 12% YTD, are now positive on the year, and health care stocks reversed a 7% drawdown into 7% gains.
Now, Class, repeat after me. I will never buy cyclicals at low PEs and record earnings. Say it again. I will never buy cyclicals at low PEs and record earnings.
Warsh's communications task force is co-led by three people with loads of expertise in how a central bank talks to markets:
• Peter Fisher (NY Fed from 1990-2001, the last half of that as the SOMA manager)
• Arminio Fraga (governor, Central Bank of Brazil, 1999-2002)
• Mervyn King (governor, Bank of England, 2003-2013)
This trio, compared to the other four, is probably the most markets-facing of the bunch. Fisher ran the desk that actually executes the Fed's operations and later worked at BlackRock; Fraga came out of Soros and later founded the hedge fund Gávea.
Fraga was parachuted into Brazil's central bank in early 1999, weeks after a currency crisis forced the real to float and sent it down more than 60% in a month. He stood up a full inflation-targeting regime in months, publishing explicit targets to give markets a new anchor after the old exchange-rate peg collapsed.
King ran the Bank of England for a decade, through the 2008–09 crisis. He's since become one of the sharpest critics of "forward guidance"—the practice of signaling where rates are headed. In a 2022 paper he argued it had become a liability. His point: the future is uncertain, so a central bank shouldn't pretend to know its own next moves. Instead of talking about the modal rate path, the Fed should explain how it reacts to a changing economy.
"The communications of a central bank need to focus on explaining its reaction function and developing a narrative about the state of the economy that changes over time meeting by meeting, report by report. The only forward guidance markets and economic agents need is an unswerving commitment to price stability." Link: https://t.co/vRvpbbDBWW
(It's worth noting, so far Warsh has sounded skeptical of spelling out that much, but it's early days.)
King is also known for his "Maradona theory" of interest rates—the idea that a credible central bank, like the soccer star who beat defenders by running straight while they braced for a swerve, can move markets through expectations alone.
Warsh's balance sheet task force will be led by
• Jeremy Stein (former Fed governor appointed by Obama)
• Karen Dynan (senior Treasury official in the Obama administration)
• Raghuram Rajan (former governor of the Reserve Bank of India from 2013-16)
Of note: Rajan co-authored a paper presented at Jackson Hole in 2022 that drew considerable attention from assembled central bankers.
That paper is here: https://t.co/0ML4nOr7SL
The paper highlighted the asymmetry of QE and QT via a ratcheting effect: The borrowing and lending habits banks develop while the Fed is flooding the system with cash may not fade when it reverses course, leaving the financial system dependent on a level of cash that becomes risky to remove. As a result, "our work suggests careful reconsideration of the merits of QE."
Hedge fund profits made during all manner of rebalances is directly sourced from the AUM of investors in index ETF's leveraged ETF's and hard benchmark index tracking mutual funds, insurance products, and pension funds
Just in case you didn't realize where these returns come from.
It's the "cost" paid by people who will not tolerate any slippage vs their benchmark. The hard benchmark causes entirely inelastic buying and selling at a particular moment in time and pays massive bid offer spread to achieve the benchmark
If rebalancing generates 3BN at one hedge fund in a month Korea and leveraged ETF rebalancing must be part of their strategy. Russell isn't big enough and the SPX and NDX adds subtracts and reweights didn't have that much juice.
My personal top 5 American traders of all time 🇺🇸
1) Jim Simons
2) Izzy Englander (special salute)
3) William O’Connor
4) Ed Thorp
5) Robert Kanter (special salute)
$PLTR Palantir's CEO just said what every big company thinks but won't say out loud: "They don't trust the AI labs. Not because AI is weak — because it's too powerful to hand to someone else."
His words: "Who controls the models, who controls the weights, who controls the value of your business."
This is the shift almost nobody is pricing in yet: the real AI war is not about smarter models. It's about who OWNS the intelligence.
Countries are spending billions on it. Companies are racing for it. And the ones without it could get left behind.
I break down "Sovereign AI," explain why it decides the winners, and identify the exact tickers poised to thrive.
Read it 👇
https://t.co/xMNgJu5imm
I've traded corporate capital structures for 38 years. Nothing is black and white but perhaps the most fundamental recurring misunderstanding over my career is that people think perpetual preferreds are "like bonds" are "fixed income instruments" are "credit instruments". The reality is they are much much closer to dividend enhanced common stock than fixed income.
As of the close Claims on 100% of $MSTR Assets are worth 90% of the value of the assets themselves.
My view has always been that this company is a leveraged closed end fund. After a tumultous week it is now priced like one. The days of the right side of the balance sheet being worth more than the left are over. That said its decently priced today. BUT @Saylor can absolutely fuck it up by selling more stock at current levels. 9 months of dividends before he must sell btc or more stock. Neither are great options but the discount in MNAV knows this.
Is Copper Next in Line? Hedge Fund Sell-Stops and Commodity Tops
Speculator sell stops may be cascading across commodities, potentially marking an enduring 1H peak. Managed money (hedge funds) have begun liquidating overweight net-longs in petroleum and grain futures, which could leave metals -- notably economically and stock-market-sensitive copper -- as a next potential sell-stop target.
Full report on the Bloomberg here: https://t.co/480BtR90Sz {BI COMD}
#copper #futures #stockmarket @Bloomberg
Implications of Extreme Gold-to-S&P Correlation
The highest gold-to-S&P 500 (SPX) 60-day correlation in our database since 1975, as well as the greatest 180-day volatility disparity since 2007, highlights the historical aberration and potential burden on the stock market to remain resilient.
Full report on the Bloomberg here: https://t.co/Yz7A4M36xq {BI COMD}
#gold #stockmarket @Bloomberg