Wesley Huff’s course: The Historical Reliability of the Bible, is available now.
In this course, @WesleyLHuff guides us through the historical foundations of Scripture. Together, we examine the evidence for the Bible's reliability from the formation of the biblical canon to the textual history of the Old and New Testaments, as well as the archaeological discoveries that illuminate the biblical world.
Along the way, Huff explains how the early church recognized the New Testament canon, traces the history of English Bible translation, and concludes by evaluating historical Jesus studies, showing how the cumulative historical evidence supports the Gospels as reliable eyewitness accounts of Jesus.
Hello Mrs. Owens,
You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk."
He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it.
You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it.
You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days.
You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater.
You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu.
You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name.
And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely.
Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him.
So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath.
Every single one failed.
I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow.
The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts.
I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.
In the same way it's foolish to caveat celebrating your wife on Mother's Day by acknowledging her faults ("I know she really has a temper and is kind of a slob, but she's still a great mom!")...
You don't have to caveat before celebrating your country on 250.
We were told we'd be shot by ICE, we never saw them
We were told the police would be tough, they partied with us
We were told the Americans didn't want us, they embraced us like family
Stop listening to the 'media' trying to divide us! live your lives and make memories! 🧡
@GoodmanHoops@GoodmanHoops yeah crazy. Maybe they just meant it when they said the guy has a problem and they wanted to help him instead of hang him out to dry
@SaraLRiley@HAWK_GUYS Idk what a TRO is but I think the consensus of Tech fans is, “the system is broken, don’t get mad at him for taking advantage of it for his benefit”. Especially when the NCAA lawyer agreed that he did not impact the competitive integrity of the game.
@matthew_auch Maybe it is a “get out of jail free card” but you can’t fault the guy for using the NCAA’s failure to abide by their own policies against them.
@matthew_auch The mental health argument is based on the diagnosis and recommendation of a medical professional from an unaffiliated addiction treatment facility. The argument is that the NCAA did not do what it said it would do to promote the mental health of student athletes.