@chamath What an uninspiring, sniveling little man you’ve devolved into. All that immigrant struggle and you’re ultimately just another sarcastic sycophant trying to be one of the guys.
@chamath@chamath We miss the heroic Chamath, who often spoke of your personal struggle from humble immigrant roots and great empathy for others. Are you really this brittle anti-Dem, anti-media sensationalist or is this just a Sacks mirroring phase that subsides after Trump loses?
Did you know that OpenAI has an API?
That means you can build your own apps similar to ChatGPT.
With no-code tools (like Bubble) you don't even need to know how to code 🤯
Join 3,000+ students learning how with hands-on projects: https://t.co/Z4wGd3GJw4
90% of people are still using ChatGPT in beginner mode.
8% are buying prompts on the prompt marketplace.
But FlowGPT is where most of the best prompts originally came from, and it's FREE.
Here are 10 prompts from FlowGPT to massively get ahead with AI:
2. Generate Best MidJourney Prompts easily.
Award Winning MidJourney Prompt Generation Tool uses ChatGPT to create intriguing prompts for diverse needs with its innovative approach.
Prompt: https://t.co/sB2ZU55FZN
As a society, we should always question the status quo.
How were the best, most powerful businesses made?
Disruption. Incumbents were challenged. Traditional thoughts and ideals were questioned.
Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Tesla, etc.
These companies looked at conventional models and challenged them. They ended up being the winners in their respective categories.
Now why are we crazy to think the same isn’t true for science?
The world was once thought to be flat.
Disproven.
We thought we were the center of the universe.
Disproven.
You could continue the list forever.
Now when we talk about COVID, why is it so bad to challenge the status quo? It shouldn’t be.
In fact, it should be encouraged, to a certain degree of course.
Questioning the status quo is important and pushes society forward.
Which is why public discussion on @joerogan should ABSOLUTELY happen.
It’s the only way we could see both viewpoints side my side.
From there we can support what we believe is correct!
I have learned from experience that the experts, the government, and conventional wisdom are often wrong. ‘Inflation is transitory.” “C19 did not escape from the Wuhan lab.” “@Ukraine will fall in less than a week.” “Its not possible because it hasn’t been done before or because it hasn’t happened before.”
It is often the outlier with no experience in a field that challenges the status quo, that makes the important discovery, that has the unique insight, or creates the transformational innovation.
@elonmusk was not an expert in payments, electric cars or rockets. The ‘experts’ were at Visa, GM and NASA.
When you are part of the establishment, it is hard to challenge the conventional wisdom. You are incentivized not to. And when your economic livelihood can be threatened by an alternative point of view or a new innovation, you are less likely to believe it or its viability.
The greatest opportunities for discovery, innovation, understanding, and profits often exist in the unexplored paths, the unasked and unanswered questions, and in the improbable possibilities.
Our best investments have been: (1) in the stock of a real estate company going bankrupt, (2) from betting that a triple-A rated company was insolvent, and (3) betting that a virus in China would cause a global economic shutdown.
Each of these investments were met with extreme skepticism at the time they were made. In each case, we were the naive ones when we made these investments. We were not bankruptcy investors, experts in bond insurers or credit default swaps, nor did we know anything about viruses or pandemics.
From my experience, knowledge is advanced and insights are gleaned by studying alternative points of view from conventional and unconventional sources of information, and by not discrediting a point of view simply because it comes from someone who is not an accredited member of the relevant establishment, who does not have an advanced degree in the subject at hand, and/or someone whom has been criticized in the media.
In an effort to get to the truth, I try to keep my mind open to alternative possibilities and weigh them against each other. I often find that truth can emerge when two or more articulate and intelligent individuals in an open forum discuss and debate a controversial subject and are required to address unscripted questions from a knowledgeable audience or moderator.
The above is why I added to the pot in attempting to convince @PeterHotez to discuss vaccines with @RobertKennedyJr on @joerogan. I think knowledge will emerge from the discussion that will catalyze further explorations or investigations that will bring us closer to the truth and help us answer questions about vaccine efficacy and safety that remain unsettled for many. And if @PeterHotez is not the best or most knowledgeable advocate for vaccines, then we should find another one.
In getting to the truth, I want to hear from the greatest skeptics and advocates. Both deserve a platform on the path to truth.
And no, I am not an anti-vaxxer.
@RBReich@RBReich You are the working class/poor? Rage towards successful entrepreneurs is exactly why lifelong Dems, like Musk, will switch to rational alternatives. “We” are tired of the crybaby partisanship your tweets typify. You do Dem voters a disservice and frankly, your career.
It's free to be nice. Being mean can have consequences.
I just told my team to stand down on diligence with a startup because the Founder insulted me unnecessarily in an email.
It wasn't what he said. It was how he said it. It was intended to harm.
Life's too short. Good luck.
Every day, mathematics is used to address some of the world's toughest problems. Read more about Dr. Noble and Dr. Viossat, who are using mathematical models to tackle cancer regrowth and improve #cancertreatment. https://t.co/Kn0mvQYbfd #cancerresearch