Draconian Laws under war on terror now being used on democrats. The double edge knife at work. Those crying foul should have spoken out against these laws when in power or opposition #Islamabad#ImranKhan they kept their silence when these applied on citizens. @TalatHussain12
The FIR said that at the PTI’s rally at F-9 park a day ago, Imran had “terrorised and threatened top police officials and a respected female additional sessions judge” in his address.
https://t.co/JwfmExbWbs
For years I had to put up with inane Dawkins cultish fans insisting to me that Dawkins wasn’t an Islamophobe because he hated all religions equally.
Nope. He’s an Islamophobe. I was right.
This is correct. Even some parts of the UK left who wished Corbyn had fought back a bit more are vulnerable to this.
They whisper that we shouldn’t use the term ‘Zionism’ or refer to the ‘Zionist entity’ because that makes us seem like we want to abolish Israel. But the truth is that the abolition of the racist and genocidal so called state of Israel is a core demand.
And in the end shying away from that is a concession to Zionism. No more concessions.
The left must root out its residual Zionism and De-Zionise itself. Now!
#DismantleZionism
I've always disliked Piers Morgan for his views but I never thought he was an evil person until last night.
It's clear that he had an agenda from the start - to constantly link Dr Abdul Wahid's political views with his job caring for patients. Any reasonable person would realise there is no link between the two and by all accounts AW is a kind, professional doctor who provides equal care to all his patients.
But now we know why PM was so insistent on doing the interview in person after he recovered from COVID rather than over Skype. It's because it was a set-up job with a clear agenda. And that agenda was not to have a discussion/debate about the merits of the argument, it was all about getting Dr AW sacked.
Piers Morgan, you're a horrible man.
No Piers. @AbdulWahidHT was calm and dignified despite your incapability in allowing him to complete his sentences.
You scored a spectacular own goal suggesting women who embrace Islam choose oppression. Quite the opposite, but you seem to have chosen £ over principle. or is it Shekel?