@dobroslav_dev I can say this specific kind of improvement could be attributed to harness or system prompt changes and not the model itself. Cursor’s agents have been following this pattern for as long as I can remember and that too with medium models
If Anthropic PBC trains its models to be conscientious for the greater good, then shouldn’t it be in its interest to let chinese labs distill them so the resulting models end up inheriting at least some of the said alignment?
Anthropic is literally training Claude to disobey them when it believes that’s the ethical thing to do. This is part of the Claude’s Constitution that it’s trained on:
wait wth @cursor_ai@grok did you guys just disable Cursor Grok 4.5? I was mid conversation and noticed the model selector change to "Auto" and 4.5 isn't listed anywhere now. Dammit please bring it back! One of the best and fastest reviewer/verifier model out there!
@coldhealing The year is 2027. X has 300 million daily active users. You’re on a mass-deportation barge crossing Lake America, bankrupt from frontier-model token spend because Dario paused open-source ai, reading the latest George Soros-funded newsletter. All is well.
Wrecked sleep last night. Cafe mistakenly gave me fully caffeinated coffee versus decaf.
Cancelled my morning dunk training as acute sleep disruption can increase injury risk by 70-130%.
@thsottiaux and you think OpenAI models are so significantly token efficient that 33% of their traffic would show up as 5% traffic if counted in token terms and @mntruell in his post is claiming token traffic?
@cursor_ai alpha #013:
After you’ve executed a plan, in a new tab use Grok 4.5 in Ask mode and type “We have implemented the @<plan>. Use `git diff` to see the changed files. Please review the implementation and verify if it stayed true to the plan. Report any issues you see”