Lisforthat

law nerd, receipt reader, questionable decisions guaranteed

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@CarolJahnsen @jessmachadoshow The people that actually care and invested in Jess, the "OG's" like me that sent her a gift for unwrapping, engaged with her as much as possible, membership, etc. she's losing those and gaining you's. Not even a blue ✔️

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@CarolJahnsen @jessmachadoshow And that's the problem. Y'all are cheering her in the wrong direction,if you want Jess to succeed and not be broke again, she should TRY to squash this bullshit. Life is too short and she's bleeding followers, subscribers and members. SO 🖕

[BoozeyBeauty @BoozeyBeauty]

ADA Adam Lally only worked on 2 cases with fired-and-decertified trooper Michael Proctor:

Karen Read
Myles King

The similarities are terrifying. In BOTH cases, key Ring camera/surveillance video was slow-walked or went completely missing. In both cases, the defense had to fight for years just to get basic discovery. In both cases, exculpatory evidence was withheld.

People want to pretend the corruption in the Read trial was a unique outlier, (or that the case was a legitimate, merit-based investigation), but the carbon-copy evidence issues in these two cases prove it's a standard operating procedure.

And it simply isn't a coincidence.. It's a pattern of systemic misconduct. Once is an accident, but twice is a deliberate playbook.

[Microdots @DropMicrodots]

It’s easy to make a mean face and tell the media all the serious things you’re doing. But Col Noble doesn’t follow thru. According to @RosemaryScapicc, he never investigated Michael Proctor, despite saying he was. He didn’t provide any docs when she requested them. Not a man of his word. Not surprised.

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@Mafi287 Happy 5th lil guy!

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@little_foot777 @BakerBroken Same, took actual research to figure what happened

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@NyraGotTheJuice Gorgeous babe

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@BakerBroken Hopped on my first one like an hour ago and I think it was the same one from Sparkly rabbit, did it go for hours?

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@auntiedebbb That's my alien you thief

[Aidan Kearney @DoctorTurtleboy]

Michael Desronvil, the Lindsay Clancy holdout juror lauded as a "hero" and "patriot" by those who believe she should've been convicted of first degree murder, was arrested for assaulting his ex-wife because he refused to let her comfort their crying baby, and four years later beat up his minor nephew who called police on him because he blamed the teenager for ruining his life. He now lives in Bridgewater in an apartment where he is refusing to pay rent for the last 6 months. Story: https://t.co/LIONIzifR6

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@IanRunkle The Lioness 🤣

[Jimmy @auntiedebbb]

🎵It’s not that hard to say

[David Yannetti @BostonDefender]

Respectfully, @djunaperkins, this is a political cheap shot and beneath your dignity.

You know nothing about the federal investigation, what evidence they had, how they investigated and why they got involved.

I had never met @adamdeitch before the Read case, but I am supporting him in this race because he has displayed the ethics, judgment and experience that are necessary to be district attorney.

In an office that featured festering incompetence and poor judgment, Adam is the breath of fresh air that is necessary to establish the office’s credibility and commitment to justice.

You owe him an apology.

[David Yannetti @BostonDefender]

A primer on unethical reporting and the priorities of certain media:

Every publication prides itself on thorough, accurate and ethical reporting. A lot of work — and a system of checks and balances— is supposed to be put into place to hopefully ensure that a publisher will NEVER have to issue a correction. If someone takes issue with an article but the publisher has an out because there was some ambiguity, a publisher will take that “out” and do anything to avoid having to publish a correction.

Issuing a correction is a black eye to the reporter, certainly. It signals to future editors that she cannot be trusted. But it is also embarrassing to the editors and the publisher, who are forced to admit that they failed at their jobs as well.

So now we come to @GretchenVoss64’s agenda-driven hit piece in @BostonMagazine. People ask why someone would not grant an interview to a reporter like her. You don’t grant someone like that an interview because you would be giving an untrustworthy person control over your words. She’s not seeking the truth, she’s advancing her own narrative, irrespective of (and often contrary to) the truth. And given her lack of ethics, she will take a quote from you and publish it out of context to make it appear as though you said something that you didn’t. To try to make you look bad to advance her agenda.

As an aside, those dangers are exactly why any criminal defense attorney will advise a client never to speak to the police.

I chose not to speak with @GretchenVoss6 because I knew her to be untrustworthy. And sure enough, she was so blinded by her own bias that she took an old quote of mine out of context and made it appear as though I said something that I didn’t. In the process, of course, she unwittingly proved what her intentions would have been had I agreed to speak with her in the first place. And by doing so, she put her magazine in legal jeopardy. Shame on her.

You can bet that when @BostonMagazine received my demand for a correction, they panicked. They consulted with their legal department, who advised them that there was no “out.” They recognized that it was one of the strongest defamation claims that could exist, because @GretchenVoss64 acted with actual malice and there was zero defense to what she did. They were loathe to do it but they had no choice. They issued the correction and hoped that would put the issue to bed.

I’m told, however, that the print edition still exists. I haven’t decided yet whether to take any further action regarding that clear defamation. In addition, there are many other inaccuracies in her “article” (although I will likely leave it to others to demand those corrections). For now, it is just satisfying — once again — to have exposed corruption.

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@JrluvinGagirl @OliviaLambo_ @DamonE73270 Who said that? Whomever you are? I'll be sure to take that very seriously since you said it.

[Microdots @DropMicrodots]

It's disgraceful that Boston Magazine Editor-in-Chief Chris Vogel allowed his publication to be weaponized for such an out-of-touch, lazy article bloated with lies, half-truths, and basic factual errors. He's either asleep at the wheel, or doesn't care about the quality of his magazine.

[Lisforthat @1snook_8791]

@DoctorTurtleboy @Will428304 That's been thier plan all along I think, the financially cripple you, let's make sure you win/win and $win

[Loren Katie @LorenKatie]

Join me tomorrow 2pm EST. for a fundraiser for @KYMaverickreal, many special guests, including @TheLegalEdge @TheEmilySee @MazzaMedia @BakerBroken @MaryBil99341482 @Will428304 @lauriemullenesq @TheExpertOnX & MANY more. Including special surprise guests!

https://t.co/jl7tIjLpkq

[Microdots @DropMicrodots]

Grant Ellis Smith does it again. Chris Albert reveals he saw Michael Proctor at thanksgiving a few years before John O'Keefe's death, and at Proctor family parties over the years. Despite this, Michael Proctor and the Norfolk DA's office concealed & adamantly denied their relationship in court.

https://t.co/ipgTZGxE5l