Indie gamedev (@Majorariatto)
Made Ambidextro, Pineapple on pizza, and others.
Also: Youtuber, pigeon rescuer, vegan. Reducing suffering in the world.
EN/ES
This indie dev made a game where you control two characters at the same time.
- Control one character with your left hand
- Control another character with your right hand
Would you play this? It's called Ambidextro.
Is there a charitable interpretation on Big Walk team's stance on AI that doesn't come off as unapologetically hypocritical? What does it mean to not endorse your own AI usage, and to support the work of those who fight against that same usage?
@TheKeyOfAnarkh Calling it sketchy behavious was going too far and assuming too much. It still seems weird that a team apparently (by their statement) so concerned about AI usage didn't think their ussage was worth mentioning, but it could be.
@TheKeyOfAnarkh Their sketchy behavior kindles the kind of witch hunt they are now suffering. If they think using a bit of AI for bugs they can't solve is OK, they shouldn't have hidden it until now. They knew people would be mad and choose not being transparent.
@EveTaylor376200@TheKeyOfAnarkh They are against the normalization of AI usage, and witch hunting is partly the effect of people believing its usage is not that normalized. I concede that maybe they didn't realize this was worth disclossing, but their statement makes it seem like they did.
@zemereth@deadlyfiddler@jasbro1109@TheKeyOfAnarkh If a company disclosed the use of child labor I wouldn't buy from it if I can avoid it. I don't think this is really related to the topic at hand.
@TheKeyOfAnarkh That's fair. Most people would think it's a non-issue, so that a valid reason not to have said anything until now. Their statement makes it seems like they think it's an issue, though.
@deadlyfiddler@jasbro1109@TheKeyOfAnarkh I think it's OK they used AI, but they were not transparent and they don't even endorse the use of AI, which is weird.
Also, they used it for more than 10 lines, that's just a specific example of how they used it.
@deadlyfiddler@jasbro1109@TheKeyOfAnarkh If they thought AI is just a tool and they don't need to discuse it, it would be more defensible, but they specifically said they don't endorse even limited use of AI, so its extra damming.
@deadlyfiddler@jasbro1109@TheKeyOfAnarkh They knew part of their public wouldn't buy the game if they discloses AI usage, so they didn't. They choose to hide their AI usage, and now that they have revealed it, there's backlash by users who feel betrayed.
@jasbro1109@TheKeyOfAnarkh I'm not talking about Steam. They didn't mention it on their site, on twitter, on an interview, or anywhere, even though they knew a lot of people wouldn't buy it if they knew, and they still pretend to be against AI usage themselves.
@theballsknower@TheKeyOfAnarkh I'm a game dev with 7 games released, currently working on a new one made with extensive use of Claude Code.
Take the L, retard.
@khozmos0107@TheKeyOfAnarkh Its a fact that a lot of people object on ethical grounds to buy anything that used AI, which does not happen with the other things you mention. They deliberately let people think the game didn't use any AI, and even now they say they don't endorse its usage.
@theballsknower@TheKeyOfAnarkh I use AI, idiot, but unlike them, I don't hide it or say I don't endorse my own AI usage. If they think using a bit of AI is OK, they should say it clearly and help normalize it to shut up the weirdos. They are doing the opposite.
@_Zaspian@TJDetweile@theogramme_dev lmao
Iba a dejar pasar que seas tontísimo, pero decir que soy yo el que no tiene pensamiento lógico con la comprensión lectora que demuestras es demasiado.
@_Zaspian No te estás enterando de nada. Me parece bien que usen la IA para lo que quieran, pero están diciendo que, pese a haberla usado, no apoyan su uso incluso de forma limitada como han hecho ellos mismos.