@Orbness@marksimner Utlity pouches, And rifle slings for that matter, are stores equipment and not blanco’d. Troops purchased Blanco from NAAFI themselves.
@marksimner@Orbness 2 of 2 - reenactors use KG3 as its readily available, and made in large numbers post war by numerous other countries as well as the UK. Photo of my impression of a BREN no2 which can show the shade difference between basic pouches & utility (latter wasnt blanco’d).
@marksimner@Orbness This is my standard infantry impression for Normandy 44. 103 blanco. The answer is there’s no correct Blanco shade as such, but KG3 was fresh in service and the chaps didn’t change it overnight. Photo evidence and first hand accounts back that up. (1 of 2)
@marksimner@Orbness 97, 103 or KG3. Airborne by its nature was drawn from numerous regiments, and you’ve got glider infantry also as well as para. I tend to sport 103 for late war. KG3 isn’t wrong as such, but it’s massively overused by reenactors. Photo, 1945/Varsity, check the anklet colour.
@marksimner@Orbness Id disagree that KG3 “is the one to opt for”. 103 - as well as 97 - are arguably more suitable, and evidence of this can be seen in photographs from the time. Various shades were in use, and it’s a re-enactorism that KG3 (and KG3 only) was used D-Day onwards. Photo - Berlin, 1945
If you are seriously interested in the Light Infantry in the Peninsular War you can't afford *not* to read 'Riflemen'. My review (with some discussion of the 5th battalion, 60th (North American) regiment is at https://t.co/vJz6tgNNol
@WarwickshirePCC Can you explain to me why SCs do not have access to BWV? Are plans afoot for this to be rolled out? I notice that you said in Dec 2016:- “by the end of 2017 we will be in a position to see front line officers in all parts of the force fully equipped”. Thanks.