ival

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@FrTotleben92742 @XboxLiveGOP Speaking of reference and sense, have you read ventimiglia's work on aquinas and frege? I was wondering how a thomist would respond to his arguments against aquinas holding a real distinction between essence and being

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@PatFlynnCOS https://t.co/8jMkRd3piW

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@Scholastic_X @jderosa1990 I dont know about his other work, but this quote doesn't seem to be saying that gods action is extrensic or transient, only that his substanse is not changed or differs due to his free decision to create, emphasis on the "that would not be there were he not causing that effect"

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@ASanctoThoma @Qmodo2 Where is this from?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@reg_pepe @analyticatheism @Wired73813850 @RealAtheology You dont find puntels dismissal of substance at least somewhat troubling?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@StMichael71 How can a will that is part of a soul thats wholly good corrupt its own nature? Those seem incompatible

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@JoshHochschild Do you agree with the claim that aquinas thought in the de ente is more avicennian, and that it changes over time?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@justendmefam1 @ByzCat @Filoremy @Wired73813850 @ClassicalTheis @MilitantThomist @Scholastic_X @espanyolatzaros @XboxLiveGOP @DamiendePyle @JayBAlphonso @FrDylanSchrader @dlendman2 I love te velde too btw, I started his book on the summa and Ive been meaning to come back to it. I read his participation and substantiality a while back, ive also wanted to reread it. It and an article by Stephen brock on if thomas esse is platonic have always stuck in my head

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@justendmefam1 @ByzCat @Filoremy @Wired73813850 @ClassicalTheis @MilitantThomist @Scholastic_X @espanyolatzaros @XboxLiveGOP @DamiendePyle @JayBAlphonso @FrDylanSchrader @dlendman2 Nice, I need to read lonergan, Ive only come across his name in a critique of his isomorphic thought from gaven kerr, but it seemed really fascinating and insight and verbum get a ton of praise for sure. Lonergan and de raeymaeker are my next reads hopefully

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@DeVeritate1 Hey, love the blog, was wondering if you were ever going to make that follow up article on ei?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@_bonaventurian What kind of "ought" is being used here?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@ByzCat @FeserEdward Doesnt he sort of grant this to leibniz and avicenna in the article?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@FeserEdward @Filoremy Any interaction with skalkos work?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@ByzCat @SpeedWatkins If god, absolutely speaking, could have not willed creation, then wouldn't that mean he would have necessarily willed himself as final end. Wouldn't that mean the will is not simply the ability to choose otherwise, if its possible for god to only have necessarily willed himself?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@Filoremy Ooh, I love Philip neri reese, did you get the chance to watch his presentation?

[ival @989ihfdd4]

@justendmefam1 @JohnBoethius @Hazlitt_3 Kind of off topic question, but have you read khris McDaniels book on the fragmentation of being?