Alberta’s Radiologists welcome this initiative to decrease waitlists for CT and MRI, two critical tools in the overall function of our health-care system. Timely access to all medical imaging and image-guided procedures is so important, now more than ever. https://t.co/6hPDfc9iH9
Alberta’s Radiologists look forward to being heard and respected in the upcoming negotiations and to having all facts properly considered. Albertans are tired of the war on doctors and want to see government work more collaboratively like this with MD’s. https://t.co/c7b5CJKiHC
AMA President Dr. Paul Boucher urges Albertans to follow the new and current restrictions to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Via @calgaryherald https://t.co/vpLeSCy0Lm
$1B (billion) forecast to be saved by Gov’t of AB on doctors’ fees this year: pandemic opens up opportunity for settling deal with doctors https://t.co/lcNlm1FdAp @Albertadoctors#budget2021
"The role of the physician is to provide the best care we can, in compliance with our professional ethics and responsibilities. In support of this, physicians require an environment characterized by respect and general stability." Read more: https://t.co/7MdE9VBFz2
@youseepeeYYC@Albertadoctors@shandro In short - no, or at least not so far. We believe there are savings to be found in health care, including Radiology, but the way to identify and action them safely and appropriately is through a negotiated agreement with the AMA.
@SteveBuick2 Hi Steve, there are structural reasons for higher FFS payments here including less physicians on ARPs, and more outpatient diagnostics funded via FFS. The fear is that your gov’t will misrepresent this as evidence of higher take home pay — and you’re already doing so.
@SteveBuick2 Also - AB has downloaded much more cost responsibility for Radiology, Cardiology, Ophthalmology etc testing onto FFS MDs here vs. other Provinces, so you’ll see big gross numbers for these docs but this does not mean more take home pay either.
@SteveBuick2 Well Steve, as there are more doctors on FFS in Alberta vs. ARP compared to other Provinces (as you often point out), that means there are more MD here covering their own overhead than in these other Provinces, and you are going to see higher gross $ amounts on these lists in AB.
@SteveBuick2@albertadocs Steve, since 2017-2018 doctors in most other provinces have had fee increases and some are getting COVID relief so their practices can stay open. Alberta is in decline. How about some up to date numbers forecasting these changes ?
@SteveBuick2 Hi Steve - in Diagnsotic Imaging, these overheads are for the publicly provided services. Your so-called private services like MRI’s for WCB are minimal contributors to income, in the 2% range overall, and come with major additional overhead costs not counted here.
@JbsmnJbn @SteveBuick2@Albertadoctors Other types of doctors are not supposed to own an interest in an X-ray facility they refer to, although they can apply for an exclusion from the CPSA.
@JbsmnJbn @SteveBuick2@Albertadoctors Radiologists require patients to have a referral from another non-Radiologist physician. The conflict of interest potential you raise is excluded from our practices.
@MakisMD@Albertadoctors@albertaNDP@GoAHealth Radiologists have traditionally been very pragmatic in their approach to these types of conflicts, and just want solutions that let doctors take care of their patients. I would be very happy to see AMA and the GoA get back to the table and come to a binding agreement.
@MakisMD@SteveBuick2@Albertadoctors I have this position as DI Section President, as well as for the Alberta Society of Radiologists, based entirely and only from the ongoing support of my Radiologist colleagues. I am not appointed by the AMA.
@MakisMD@SteveBuick2@Albertadoctors William, both where I work and my position as President and long-standing representative of these folks can be readily confirmed by a quick online search. I’ve already answers your question. Be well :)