@SultanYavar Your continued resentment towards white people is sickening. White people built a great country that you can live and tweet happily from but you hate them and rejoice in their genocide. Disgusting
Shapiro’s chart/argument validates Fuentes’s strategy of voting Democrat if the GOP doesn’t earn their vote.
Shapiro argues that Gen Z men shouldn’t be catered too because their swing in votes was much less impactful than the swing in Hispanic older/middle aged voters.
This is how politcal people think. In order to be taken seriously you need to withhold your vote if the politicans dont do what you want.
The French riots are taking a similar shape as the BLM riots, where you have three main protestor types:
- Normie libs/leftists who peacefully protest for some asinine political cause.. mostly white. They (mostly unintentionally) cause provide critical mass and political cover for the other types.
- Brown and especially black hordes, who have vague grievances but mostly want to loot and cause destruction. They cause most of the property damage and any death.
- Anarchist/black block agitators/extreme leftists .. also mostly white. They are very organized and want to put pressure on state resources to trigger a revolution or something.
This is how you end up a movement like 2020-2021 BLM where 94% of protests were peaceful (normie libs), there was the most murders in Chicago for a weekend of all time(African hordes) and there was a string of over a hundred consecutive, often violent, protest events in Portland(black block).
Hypergamy is real, although maybe not as extreme as some think.
Using data from a study on US colleges covering fall 2008–spring 2019, an estimated ~25% of men’s reported partnerships involved the top 2.5% of men by number of partners. So the top men do very well for themselves, but ~75% of partnerships were outside of the top 2.5% of men.
Men with 1 sexual partner made up 37.5% of the male sample but took part in an estimated 22% of men’s reported partnerships.
About 34% of men had no sexual partners in the previous year.
@aidannonx@Tako1Fall But how would you describe this group of people. There seems to be a ton of shared connections, patronage and shared interest, sometime almost religiously so, with Strauss.
Are you saying this can not be thought of as a legible group? It’s all just specious pattern matching?
A Strauss expert tried to fact check one of Fuentes’s claims about Strauss and Jaffa.
Eventually finds that Fuentes’s claim is almost exactly right. Respect to him for posting the reference I suppose.
There is this, which is perhaps the reference:
Jaffa: "...So Strauss could have had a lot more influence but he took his ministry as a teacher as kind of a vocation. I don’t think he ever thought of it this way, but a divinely-appointed vocation."
Interviewr: A divinely-appointed vocation.
Jaffa: Yes.
Interview: To do what?
Jaffa: To save the West.
Interviewer: To save the West.
Jaffa: A world in which, first of all, in which Jews could live peacefully.
https://t.co/tFAMMagm8O
How would you describe the relationships between Thiel and the Kristols(who are obsessed with Strauss), or Thiels funding of the Straussians at Claremont McKenna, or Theils relationship with Michael Anton, or Thiels relationship with Richard Perle?
It seems to me like Thiel is not insignificant node of this political/intellectual network of people which could be describe as a “Straussian” network. That doesn’t mean that they are all in lock step with each other, or everyone each one of them knows is a big part of this network, but they do help each other out and have a shared interests and ideology to some extent.
@aidannonx@Tako1Fall He has given them a significant amount of funding specifically to study Strauss. He is clearly part of the Straussian patronage network.
As @Tako1Fall pointed out Thiel funds one of the biggest Straussian institutions. He has also written literal books about Strauss
I know they all have their own little unique takes but that’s mostly immaterial. He’s part of a “Straussian” political + intellectual clique/patronage network.
@L0m3z@Doranimated This is an unacceptably vague and evasive response.
If you want to be a leader of the nationalist right you need to articulate a direct, thorough position on the US relationship to Israel and on pro-Israel influence in the US.