1/ 🌟Paper *just* accepted @ PSPB!🌟
Does moral licensing really exist?? 👀(doing a good thing, then a less good thing)
➡️ Many failed replications. Why?
➡️ Using #metaanalysis, we put the effect to the test—to uncover when & why it happens
🧵👇
@NorthumbriaPsych #SocialPsych
@ThomasTalhelm Yeah, I've had this too! I've also had pushback about power for another null study I had published, when my sample was over 3x the size of the orginal paper, and had more than enough power to address the replication questions! just not enough power for additional questions...ugh
44 citations on my paper from 2020 - 'Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment'.
So, they can be cited!
It also led me to develop stronger theory & methods addressing bigger quesions in the field. Null results are incredibly valuble!
"Researchers value null results, but struggle to publish them"
"only 30% of respondents with null results had attempted to publish them"
"69% didn’t think null results would be accepted for publication"
https://t.co/OOqsTAnv7u
Rational ≠ Reasonable. Across five studies we find that people deliberately switch standards of “good judgment” depending on the task. in press in Open Mind🔗 https://t.co/Aqsn20tLwF
🚨Job alerts ! 🚨
Northumbria is hiring ⭐Vice Chancellor Fellows⭐
🧠Psychology
🤾🏻♂️Sports & Exercise
🔬Methods in Health & Social Care
- Assistant Profs, with 3 years for research focus
- then transition to regular role
⬇️ Links Below ⬇️
Five years ago, @DanTGilbert and Susan Fiske contacted me and @EliJFinkel to join them as editors for the HSP 6th ed. Dan envisioned a completely free, open access edition and I doubted it was possible. Today, Dan proved me wrong, and I present the HSP 6th ed.
If you design a study to test a prediction, you need to be able to falsify it. In frequentist statistics this is achieved through an equivalence test. You can't have an informative test if you can't prove yourself wrong. Learn about equivalence testing.
https://t.co/pwFRiNn8M8
The HBES 2025 elections are open for all executive positions! HBES members can vote by logging in to the HBES website, and a page will appear with access to the ballot. See for details: https://t.co/KkDWe1hbLC
Have your voice heard!
1/ 🌟Paper *just* accepted @ PSPB!🌟
Does moral licensing really exist?? 👀(doing a good thing, then a less good thing)
➡️ Many failed replications. Why?
➡️ Using #metaanalysis, we put the effect to the test—to uncover when & why it happens
🧵👇
@NorthumbriaPsych #SocialPsych
Cross-cultural evidence that intergroup conflict heightens preferences for dominant leaders: A 25-country study https://t.co/u3SZkUlbkg
Happy to be part of this large-scale project led by the great Lasse Laustsen https://t.co/irntKYpeDo
A reminder that not all replications are equal. Online replications can't always be expected to replicate findings that are contingent upon in-person cues.
Lots of famous findings about human behavior are built on the results of economic games - tasks where participants allocate resources or make choices with different payoffs. A new study finds that up to 70% of participants don't understand the instructions of these games.
8/8
Huge thanks to my co-authors Jisoo Jung, Chris Chinn, and Pat Barclay, to everyone who shared their data, and reviewers for helping make the paper stronger!! 💪🏻
Questions or comments? I’d love to hear them! 🧠💬
#OpenScience#MoralPsychology#MetaAnalysis#SocialPsych
7/
🌟This paper reframes moral licensing as a social effect—not a purely internal one based on self-regulation.
🌟And it shows how experimental methods can shape the effects we (dis)cover.
Check out preprint: https://t.co/Q8lYElxwCT