Im just an-otter. My tweets are my opinion and may be biased. My CN's and their evaluations are completly unbiassed and impartial. #FanderWaal @gracevanderwaal
@blind_via I myself, for example contributed lately on improving the nrf, ble and rf jammer of one of the best firmwares for esp32 (Bruce) tho for the rf jammer for example have a 20 seconds timeout for security reasons tho on my personal build i got rid of that but dont put it out publicly
@3xPierre@elormkdaniel Furthermore disguising newer tech in older casings is not that rare...to make peaople at ease thinking they are safe. Also don't forget multipliers...you don't even need to jam the "correct" wavelength...you can jam one of its multipliers
@3xPierre@elormkdaniel Even on old tech all what is needed are some tweaks to the modulator for example and it can transmit in different higher wavelengths...you'd be surprised what legacy tech can do still with just some tweaks.
@lanceeihoda@3xPierre@elormkdaniel Exactly...well i claim not to be any expert in any way. Im just a sectesting passionate and been doing some read team sec ops in my spare time...thus not at such a high power level, but the principles are the same as long as you have the right implementation and tx power
@3xPierre@elormkdaniel Well do you know what is inside and if it hasn't been upgraded? Sometimes newer tech gets cramped inside old tech cases precisely to give the idea its more ineffective than what it actually is You can't say it doesn't happen and you can't say from a picture that it's not the case
@3xPierre@elormkdaniel It can if its well set up. you think sat communications use oxygen-hydrogen-ozone wave combinations to travel in the air? Like i said, it's all about setting it up correctly and jam the right radio waves frequencies.
And with a sat connection one can even intercept it...
@3xPierre@elormkdaniel It can, as even if ip trafic, the signals pass by rf waves so a jammer can clog those frequencies with noise and if well implemented effectively block the traffic to 3/4/5g devices
The receiving device will end up receiving corrupted packets or not at all and efectively be jammed
@johnson_ma83332@MidWhits@randomrecruiter@abhijitwt It's the main reason monolithic languages are by definition safer. Nothing is complectly airtight but one can highly reduce threat vectors if the number of possible entry points are limited
@johnson_ma83332@MidWhits@randomrecruiter@abhijitwt Whilst old languages and very specially COBOL are simply and actually straightforward and direct without flourishing and a function does what it says it does without needing 300 different dependencies, each being a potential threat to the whole system introducing vulnerabilities
@johnson_ma83332@MidWhits@randomrecruiter@abhijitwt You realize that even today COBOL keeps the world running? There's a reason many migration to newer languages attempts failed...it's a straight forward, unequivocal practical language. Yes has it's limitations but even those can be worked around.
@eevblog Yeah I got pretty confused at this back when i spent 3 months in South Africa a few years ago...perplexed is rather the right word. But when i saw the traction those 5 test match days gather and how literaly everyone is eager to watch them it's rather fascinating
That time you try to make changes in your git fork and end up submitting a pr upstream with commits that weren't supposed to be on the main project for...reasons...and you do it TWICE! Hopefully closed the PRESS right away...but commits can be seen still. I defo need a rest haha
@akramcodez Not even that...for alotta projects (i found that out by experience myself) github and github actions just do alotta work even when you use a mobile environment to edit code and build it...wonder of building in place and use runners to get workflows going...and all that for free
The country having one of the highest criminality rate per capita in the world is daring to try giving lessons to the others?...well clean house first before looking out your neighbour's garden...and it's not the foreigners the problem...
@To_T_Start @D_French_Gunner@Xavier75@grok Pas forcément...j'en ai 250Go pour 7,80€.
Mais bon, maintenant ils on changé leurs offres, mais toujours abordables. Moi je ne suis pas prêt de changer en tout cas.