@TrueAIHound An ant displays real intelligence with the tiniest "brain". More than any frontier ai model. If scaling brought up intelligence somehow, then ants shouldn't be intelligent, but they are.
Alexander, I have deep respect for you. But honestly, I don't get who this statement of yours was for. I watched the SPIEF, and I can't imagine a bigger embarrassment for your country. What elite are you talking about? I didn’t see any—just a bunch of clowns talking about things completely detached from reality. And I’m deeply disappointed by your president; I used to think he was a tough guy. At the forum, I saw a pathetic, exhausted old man who clearly doesn’t get what’s happening in his country. And all this while St. Petersburg was under attack. I truly feel for you, and I have no doubt you see right through this but are powerless to do anything. God forbid Russia repeats the aftermath of WWI, and President Putin doesn’t share the fate of Nicholas.
🚀 Who’s about to print billions on the SpaceX IPO? Inside the massive cash-out 🧵 👇
The upcoming SpaceX IPO at a $1.77T valuation isn’t just a milestone—it's set to be the biggest institutional cash-out in tech history.
While Elon Musk is locked up for a full year, early backers are already lining up to take profits. Here is exactly who is getting ready to dump shares onto the public market ➡️
1️⃣ Founders Fund (Peter Thiel)
They got in early at a dirt-cheap valuation and are sitting on astronomical gains. Expect Thiel’s fund to max out their 20% sell allowance during the very first unlock window (July-August) to distribute massive returns back to their LPs.
2️⃣ Fidelity Investments
As a mutual fund giant managing retirement money, they have strict diversification rules. Now that SpaceX is valued at $1.77T, the position is heavily overweight. Fidelity will be forced to aggressively trim shares across all 16 lock-up windows just to rebalance their portfolio.
3️⃣ Alphabet (Google)
Google dropped $1B into SpaceX back in 2015. Right now, Alphabet is burning cash on the AI arms race and data centers. Selling a chunk of SpaceX is the perfect way for them to inject billions in pure liquidity into their balance sheet without taking on debt.
4️⃣ Baron Capital (Ron Baron)
Baron Partners has been holding since 2017. SpaceX has grown so fast it's hitting regulatory ceilings (over 15-20% of their total ETF allocation). No matter how much Ron Baron hypes Musk publicly, compliance rules mean they have to take profits.
5️⃣ The Inside Track (Friends & Family)
The juiciest part of the filing: $3.75B (5% of the total IPO) is reserved for employees, partners, and family members of top execs. The kicker? They have zero lock-up restrictions. They can liquidate for 100% cold hard cash on Day 1.
The Bottom Line for Retail:
SpaceX set up a highly strategic 16-stage staggered lock-up over 180 days to keep the stock from crashing under selling pressure. But make no mistake: the overhead supply from these giants over the first 6 months will be massive. If you're buying at $135, watch your back.
Larry, calling my text an "attack" on the Church and Scripture is fundamentally inaccurate. It is an ironic misinterpretation, akin to a small object barking at a motionless locomotive. If the institution were moving, criticism might be a threat; but it is rusted on the tracks. My writing is not an assault, but a systemic call to upgrade, rebuild, and finally set the engine back into motion.
Regarding Scripture, I do not attack it—I analyze it independently. Many readers default to institutional commentators when facing complexities, but that violates the core biblical command: "You shall not make for yourself a carved image" (Exodus 20:4). Blind reliance on theological interpreters is a form of intellectual idolatry. When you analyze the Gospels closely, you encounter structural contradictions that theologians have spent centuries trying to smooth over with poor results. I concluded my critical analysis of the Gospels 15 years ago, long before the rise of modern AI. Today, anyone can test these texts through an LLM and expose these systemic inconsistencies in seconds. For the modern generation, AI is rapidly becoming a more reliable objective authority than the Church.
Historically, in ancient priestly eras, temples functioned as the cutting-edge strongholds of science, astronomy, and medicine. Rigid dogmas were a necessary social constraint—a tool to govern and stabilize populations with underdeveloped cognitive readiness. The tragedy is that while humanity evolved, the Church lost its scientific curiosity and transformed into a static guardian of outdated dogmas.
My profile addresses a broad evolutionary horizon. The goal is to shift the archaic binary dualism of "Heaven or Hell." In a modern information-based cosmos, the law of existence is simpler: either you actively crystallize your consciousness through labor, purpose, and output—returning in a renewed vessel to continue the work—or your undeveloped ego is dismantled for parts and dissolved into total cosmic entropy.
@pankoza20 @FreeLionessIran@Jeaneqz5@elonmusk An imposed faith. Islam arrived in Persia in the 7th century through the Arab conquest, brutally displacing the native religion of Zoroastrianism. The historical memory of this event as a loss of independence remains alive to this day.
My text is not an attack on the divine, Larry; it is a wake-up call to modern institutional religion. For centuries, traditional dogmas have tried to curb human savagery through guilt and fear, yet they have failed. To a modern, critical mind, these outdated frameworks look archaic, which is why religion is losing ground.
It is time to shift the boundaries. My goal is to translate the core metaphysical truth into a modern language of consciousness and evolution—shifting from passive submission to active, total personal responsibility.
Even Dostoevsky, in his Legend of the Grand Inquisitor, brilliantly exposed how religious institutions corrected Christ's path by turning freedom into dogmatic control to manage the "wild" masses. I am arguing for the return to that lost freedom and the true maturity of the human soul.
Thank you for your prayers. I genuinely wish you peace on your path.
I would never write you off as a fool, Larry. I have too much respect for your mind and your contribution to human knowledge to do that.
If my path of independent thought looks like rebellion to you, so be it. But remember that Dostoevsky’s heroes were also called madmen and rebels by the institutional world of their time, yet they were the ones who carried the truest love.
The customer-driven eval loop is perfect for building great SaaS products, chatbots, and productivity tools. However, treating customer feedback as the north star for evaluating frontier intelligence is a dangerous utopia.
By relying on human preference (like standard RLHF), we trap the model within the limits of human understanding. A user cannot accurately evaluate an answer that surpasses their own expertise; they can only evaluate how convincing it sounds.
As a result, this loop does not build superintelligence—it builds a highly sophisticated digital parrot. The AI optimizes for sycophancy, telling us exactly what we want to hear with absolute confidence, while remaining fundamentally incapable of scientific discovery or solving problems beyond human capability. True frontier AI requires objective, rigorous evaluation that goes far beyond market satisfaction.
Yes, Larry, I have not only read Dostoevsky; I have deeply studied and analyzed his metaphysics.
Please, do not view my text through a simplistic lens, for a simplistic view only generates simplification.
Allow me to clarify the aspects of my text through the prism of Dostoevsky’s philosophy, because it doesn’t contradict his view—it actively refines the very mechanics of it.
When Father Zosima in The Brothers Karamazov states that "loving humility is a terrible force, the strongest of all," Dostoevsky is not talking about passive submission or slavish begging before an altar. He is talking about a sovereign, conscious choice of a strong soul to conquer its own ego.
My text attacks the historical degradation of religion into institutionalized guilt and blind submission. Dostoevsky fought against the exact same thing. His humble heroes—like Sonya Marmeladova or Prince Myshkin—are the ultimate "hackers" of the material cage. By silencing their ego (humility), they dissolve the filters of the 3D world and resonate directly with the Source (Divine Love).
When Dostoevsky says "everyone is responsible to everyone for everything," it is the exact equivalent of realizing that we are parts of a singular Cosmic Whole, placed in the harsh crucible of matter for systemic self-awareness.
True humility isn't weakness; it is the ultimate technology of shifting from ego-consumption to cosmic output.