Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭

Retired
🇦🇹🇦🇺🇧🇪🇧🇬🇨🇭🇨🇺🇨🇾🇨🇿🇩🇰🇪🇸🇫🇷🇬🇧
🇬🇷🇭🇰🇭🇷🇮🇨🇮🇩🇮🇱🇮🇹🇯🇵🇰🇪🇱🇰🇲🇬🇲🇹
🇲🇾🇳🇱🇵🇭🇵🇸🇸🇨🇸🇪🇸🇬🇹🇭🇹🇷🇺🇸🇻🇳

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

https://t.co/E56ANiwIxZ

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@cryptogoos Tranlates to:
Life will be harder
There will be a recession
Trust me, I lie as much as I can

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@WesRoth Did anyone check if he is developing dementia?

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@Bitcoin_Teddy Trust him, bro ...
He is well known for distributing wealth. Upstream.

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@haider1 What are "AI-systems"? A perceptron? A GPS? A collection of gadgets? A data center?
Yes, you are inept and talking BS.

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@DorotheaBaur @KarenHao @RepublikMagazin Scammy Sammy; Schlangenölverkäufer.

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@VraserX Odorio is a gangsta too, I told ou ..

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@DorotheaBaur @ArndPollmann @DanielMFeige Für den Beobachter gibt es keinen Unterschied, wenn er diesen nicht bemerkt. Trivialerweise.
Wenn man denn will, geht es auch mit Proposition 7.

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@HighSignal_AI Blabber - with the energy needs of current "AI" one could say the players are already drinking on the house ...

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@Strife212 How are LLM intelliigent? Explain!

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@AnatoliKopadze BS of the week:

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@plzaccelerate Moronie, Morona, fideralalala ...

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@jawwwn_ A_n I_nfamous standup comedian ...

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@PeterDiamandis Do AIs dream of electric sheep?
Ah, not yet. So way to go.
Do not try, you will not understand.

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@LuizaJarovsky It tells us about natural stupidity, a recurring phenomenon ...

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@DorotheaBaur "AI" will make cancer more manageable, but will not "find a cure", due to the nature of the condition (multi subsystem failure).

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@GaryMarcus No, they are always honest...
https://t.co/5jGkm5Y2nU

[Ricardo @Ric_RTP]

OpenAI's president just got CAUGHT running a fake AI safety movement to destroy the real one.

They were literally playing BOTH SIDES of the AI safety debate to manufacture outrage.

Taylor Lorenz and Tyler Johnston just exposed this in their investigation, and it's absolutely ugly:

In July 2025, exactly 10 days after a dark money offshoot of pro-AI super PAC Leading the Future filed its articles of incorporation in Nevada, a new X account called "Doomers Are Dumb" appeared. It looked like a generic meme page, posting jokes about waifus and dating drama.

Then in October, around the moment the PAC began publicly campaigning, the account pivoted to lewd and offensive content designed to mock AI safety advocates.

Then on the same day, a SEPARATE account called "Jonathan Doomer" appeared on X, claiming to be a panicked AI skeptic who had quit his job to spread warnings about the technology. He was the perfect strawman, loud and unstable and easy to dunk on, and the "Doomers Are Dumb" account was sparring with him from day one.

The PAC was running BOTH sides of the debate. They built the fake skeptic so they could make every real skeptic look unhinged by association.

The funders behind this network are not random:

OpenAI president Greg Brockman gave $25 million to Leading the Future, and another $25 million to Trump's MAGA Inc. Andreessen Horowitz, Joe Lonsdale of Palantir, Ron Conway, and Perplexity all wrote huge checks. Total commitments are around $140 million, with about $51 million still on the way.

The political operative running it all is Josh Vlasto, the same strategist who ran crypto's $300 million Fairshake PAC that helped flip the 2024 election. Their target is the 38 state-level AI safety laws legislatures passed in 2025.

Their first big victim is Alex Bores, the congressional candidate in New York's 12th district. Bores worked at Palantir until 2019, when he RESIGNED over the company's ICE contracts.

He then went on to write New York's first state-level AI safety law.

The PAC has committed at least $10 million to defeat him, and their ads attack him for "building the tech for ICE deportations" - the work he quit over.

But the nastiest part is what OpenAI did yesterday...

The company put out a statement distancing itself:

Their employees are "free to participate in the political process in their personal capacities."
In other words: It's not us, it's just our president and the executive organizing it.

Then Jason Kwon, OpenAI's Chief Strategy Officer, was caught FOLLOWING the sockpuppet accounts on X. These are accounts with almost no followers. You don't accidentally find them. You only follow them if you already know they exist.

Chris Lehane, OpenAI's Chief Global Affairs Officer, was part of the founding conversations of the PAC according to the Wall Street Journal. The company that just filed for an $852 BILLION IPO is publicly testifying to Congress that it "supports thoughtful AI regulation" while its own executives are simultaneously funding a $140 million operation designed to destroy every politician who actually tries to regulate AI.

This is the second scandal for the PAC this year. In May, the same operation got caught paying TikTok and Instagram creators $5,000 per post to spread anti-China AI panic content scripted by political operatives.

This is what the AI billionaire class is actually doing while their PR teams put Sam Altman on every podcast talking about wanting regulation.

The strategy is to fund fake critics so real critics look insane, pay creators to manufacture moral panics on demand, and control every angle of the conversation so no real conversation about AI safety ever happens.

What do you think?

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@GaryMarcus Those who lie once ...
https://t.co/xFOTV7MOXi

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@MarioNawfal That reads: "In a jjoined effort, leading AI marketiers have launched a campain to advertise their products as the ultimate platform for the development of ultra-modern weaponry."

[Ricardo @Ric_RTP]

OpenAI's president just got CAUGHT running a fake AI safety movement to destroy the real one.

They were literally playing BOTH SIDES of the AI safety debate to manufacture outrage.

Taylor Lorenz and Tyler Johnston just exposed this in their investigation, and it's absolutely ugly:

In July 2025, exactly 10 days after a dark money offshoot of pro-AI super PAC Leading the Future filed its articles of incorporation in Nevada, a new X account called "Doomers Are Dumb" appeared. It looked like a generic meme page, posting jokes about waifus and dating drama.

Then in October, around the moment the PAC began publicly campaigning, the account pivoted to lewd and offensive content designed to mock AI safety advocates.

Then on the same day, a SEPARATE account called "Jonathan Doomer" appeared on X, claiming to be a panicked AI skeptic who had quit his job to spread warnings about the technology. He was the perfect strawman, loud and unstable and easy to dunk on, and the "Doomers Are Dumb" account was sparring with him from day one.

The PAC was running BOTH sides of the debate. They built the fake skeptic so they could make every real skeptic look unhinged by association.

The funders behind this network are not random:

OpenAI president Greg Brockman gave $25 million to Leading the Future, and another $25 million to Trump's MAGA Inc. Andreessen Horowitz, Joe Lonsdale of Palantir, Ron Conway, and Perplexity all wrote huge checks. Total commitments are around $140 million, with about $51 million still on the way.

The political operative running it all is Josh Vlasto, the same strategist who ran crypto's $300 million Fairshake PAC that helped flip the 2024 election. Their target is the 38 state-level AI safety laws legislatures passed in 2025.

Their first big victim is Alex Bores, the congressional candidate in New York's 12th district. Bores worked at Palantir until 2019, when he RESIGNED over the company's ICE contracts.

He then went on to write New York's first state-level AI safety law.

The PAC has committed at least $10 million to defeat him, and their ads attack him for "building the tech for ICE deportations" - the work he quit over.

But the nastiest part is what OpenAI did yesterday...

The company put out a statement distancing itself:

Their employees are "free to participate in the political process in their personal capacities."
In other words: It's not us, it's just our president and the executive organizing it.

Then Jason Kwon, OpenAI's Chief Strategy Officer, was caught FOLLOWING the sockpuppet accounts on X. These are accounts with almost no followers. You don't accidentally find them. You only follow them if you already know they exist.

Chris Lehane, OpenAI's Chief Global Affairs Officer, was part of the founding conversations of the PAC according to the Wall Street Journal. The company that just filed for an $852 BILLION IPO is publicly testifying to Congress that it "supports thoughtful AI regulation" while its own executives are simultaneously funding a $140 million operation designed to destroy every politician who actually tries to regulate AI.

This is the second scandal for the PAC this year. In May, the same operation got caught paying TikTok and Instagram creators $5,000 per post to spread anti-China AI panic content scripted by political operatives.

This is what the AI billionaire class is actually doing while their PR teams put Sam Altman on every podcast talking about wanting regulation.

The strategy is to fund fake critics so real critics look insane, pay creators to manufacture moral panics on demand, and control every angle of the conversation so no real conversation about AI safety ever happens.

What do you think?

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@ProudSocialist However, AI can "live" without us.
Or "we" (WE, Zamyatin) can live on in herds, trillionaires private branded property.
They then will take care of supplies to protect their property.

[Dr. C. Misiak🇩🇪Psychologist🇹🇷🇱🇰🇰🇪🇻🇳🇵🇭 @foobsr]

@jawwwn_ We are in it for the money ...